Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011537
Original file (20140011537.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE :	  7 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011537 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the following orders be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF):

	a.  BRAVO Detachment, 556th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 84-317, dated 24 March 2000, for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) for the period 29 January 1997 through 28 January 2000; and

	b.  Headquarters, 92nd Engineer Battalion, Permanent Order 18-01, dated 
18 January 2012, for award of the AGCM (7th Award) for the period 12 January 2009 through 11 January 2012.

2.  The applicant states she wants her awards in proper order. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* Permanent Orders 112-05, dated 22 April 2014, for the 3rd award of the AGCM
* Permanent Orders 112-07, dated 22 April 2014, for the 7th award of the AGCM






CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 January 1991.  She is currently serving on active duty in the rank of master sergeant.

2.  Her records show she received the following orders for the AGCM:

* 1st award for the period 30 January 1991 to 29 January 1994
* 2nd award for the period 30 January 1994 to 29 January 1997

3.  BRAVO Detachment, 556th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 84-317, dated 24 March 2000, show she was awarded the AGCM for the period 29 January 1997 to 28 January 2000.  These orders have not been revoked.  

4.  Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1 Rock Island Arsenal, Permanent Orders 112-05, dated 22 April 2014, (Corrected Copy) show she was awarded the 3rd award of the AGCM for the period 30 January 1997 to 
29 January 2000.

5.  Her records also show she received the following orders for the AGCM:

* 4th award for the period 30 January 2000 to 29 January 2003
* 5th award for the period 30 January 2003 to 29 January 2006
* 6th award for the period 30 January 2006 to 29 January 2009
 
6.  Headquarters, 92nd Engineer Battalion, Permanent Order 18-01, dated 
18 January 2012, shows she was awarded the 7th award of the AGCM for the period 12 January 2009 to 11 January 2012.  These orders have not been revoked.

7.  Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1 Rock Island Arsenal, Permanent Orders 112-07, dated 22 April 2014, (Corrected Copy) show she was awarded the 7th award of the AGCM for the period 30 January 2009 to 
29 January 2012.

8.  A review of the applicant's performance section of her OMPF in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed copies of the 
24 March 2000 and 18 January 2012 AGCM orders.



9.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Army Military Human Resource Records Management  provides policies, operating tasks, and steps governing the OMPF.  Table 2-1 of this Army regulation shows that award orders are filed in the performance section of the OMPF.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The regulatory guidance states to file award orders in the performance section of the OMPF.

2.  However, there is a viable reason for revoking and removing BRAVO Detachment, 556th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 84-317, dated 24 March 2000, and Headquarters, 92nd Engineer Battalion, Permanent Order 18-01, dated 18 January 2012, from the applicant's OMPF.  Later orders corrected the periods of service for the applicant's 3rd and 7th awards of the AGCM.  The 24 March 2000 and 18 January 2012 orders offer no relevant information regarding the applicant's service, conduct, or duty performance.  Moreover, revoking and removing these orders eliminates the potential for confusion by officials authorized to review the performance section of the applicant's OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  revoking BRAVO Detachment, 556th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 84-317, dated 24 March 2000, and Headquarters, 92nd Engineer Battalion, Permanent Order 18-01, dated 18 January 2012; and



	b.  removing BRAVO Detachment, 556th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 84-317, dated 24 March 2000, and Headquarters, 92nd Engineer Battalion, Permanent Order 18-01, dated 18 January 2012, from her OMPF and ensuring the revocation orders are not filed in her OMPF.



      _______ X_   _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011537



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011537



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010654

    Original file (20080010654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 AUGUST 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080010654 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that Headquarters, 503rd Military Police Battalion (Airborne), Fort Bragg Permanent Order 317-18, dated 13 November 2002, which awarded him the Good Conduct Medal (First Award) and 88th Military Police Detachment, APO Area Pacific Permanent Orders 045-03, dated 7 January 2008, which revoked the aforementioned orders, be removed from his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001402

    Original file (20090001402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his official military personnel file (OMPF) on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) be corrected by removing erroneous or duplicate orders concerning his third award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009232C070206

    Original file (20050009232C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s request to have a memorandum, dated 19 November 1996 pertaining to denial of award to the AGCM removed from his records was carefully considered. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Department of the Army, 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry, Fort Drum, New York, memorandum dated 19 November 1996 and titled Denial of Good Conduct Medal, be removed from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001490

    Original file (20090001490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, 502d Personnel Service Battalion, Permanent Order 261-28, dated 18 September 2002, shows the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 1 September 1999 through 31 August 2001. Absent any disqualifying factors for award of the Good Conduct Medal, it appears the orders for the applicant's second award of the Good Conduct Medal were revoked because the dates of qualifying service were incorrect (not continuous). However, if the applicant can...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008277C070206

    Original file (20050008277C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his OMPF has 5 different orders for his AGCM (4th Award) and he requests that 4 of the awards be removed from his OMPF. These orders awarded the applicant the AGCM (4th Award) for the period 29 January 1997 to 28 January 2000. Orders awarding the applicant the AGCM (1st through 3rd Award) are correct for those time periods in which the applicant served.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003404

    Original file (20140003404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of Headquarters, 35th Engineer Battalion, 1st Engineer Brigade, U.S. Army Engineer School, Permanent Order 336-02, dated 2 December 2013, for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (3rd Award) from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). Army Regulation 600-8-104, appendix B (Documents Authorized for Filing in the Army Military Human Resource Record and/or iPERMS), states award orders will be filed in the performance and service folders of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002193

    Original file (20090002193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 March 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002193 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that Bravo Detachment, 18th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 045-104, dated 14 February 2001, awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period 29 March 1997 to 28 March 2000, be removed from his OMPF. The applicant’s first qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal should have been from 29 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206

    Original file (20050001440C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). There is no evidence contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award). | |DISCHARGE REASON | | |BOARD DECISION |GRANT | |REVIEW AUTHORITY | | |ISSUES 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206

    Original file (20050001440C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant provides no evidence. There is no evidence contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023180

    Original file (20100023180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states PO 26-886, dated 26 January 2001, is the appropriate order for the AGCM (2nd Award) that covers the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000. A review of his record shows the following awards are filed in the performance section of his OMPF: a. AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1994 to 5 October 1997 per PO 029-00014 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, on 29 January 1998; b. AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000 per PO...