Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000414
Original file (20090000414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        3 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090000414 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of a duplicate order for award of the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states that he was issued two sets of orders on two different dates awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) and that he recently received orders revoking the original set of orders.

3.  The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application:

	a.  Permanent Orders 119-00237, issued by Headquarters, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, New York, dated 29 April 1997;

	b.  Permanent Orders 309-00020, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill, Oklahoma, dated 5 November 1997; and

	c.  Permanent Order 347-001, issued by Task Force Hammer, 62nd Engineer Combat Battalion (Heavy), Forward Operating Base Sharana, Afghanistan, dated 12 December 2008.






CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a Regular Army staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 who holds military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Mechanic) and is currently serving with the 
62nd Engineer Battalion in Afghanistan.  He initially enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 2 years and 23 weeks on 19 July 1991 and subsequently executed a series of reenlistments in the Regular Army. 

2.  The applicant’s records show he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal (1st award) on 19 July 1994 for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service during the period 19 July 1991 through 18 July 1994.  

3.  On 29 April 1997, Headquarters, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum published Permanent Orders 119-00237, awarded the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service from 19 July 1994 through 18 July 1997. 

4.  On 5 November 1997, subsequent to his reassignment to Fort Sill, Headquarters, U.S. Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill, published Permanent Orders 309-00020, awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service from 19 July 1994 through 18 July 1997.

5.  On 24 October 2000, 17 December 2003, and 12 July 2006, the applicant was awarded his third, fourth, and fifth awards of the Good Conduct Medal for service from 19 July 1997 through 18 July 2000; 19 July 2000 through 18 July 2003, and 19 July 2003 through 18 July 2006, respectively.

6.  On 12 December 2008, Task Force Hammer, 62nd Engineer Combat Battalion (Heavy), Forward Operating Base Sharana, Afghanistan, published Permanent Order 347-001, revoking Permanent Orders 119-00237, issued by Headquarters, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum on 29 April 1997, that awarded the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for his service during the period 19 July 1994 through 18 July 1997.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) prescribes the policies and mandated operating tasks for the Military Personnel Information Management/Records Program of the Military Personnel System.  Chapter 2 of this regulation provides detailed guidance and instructions with regard to the initiation, composition, maintenance, changing, access to, and transfer of the OMPF.  

8.  Table 2-1 of this regulation shows that award orders (including badges and tabs) are filed on the performance portion of the OMPF.   Paragraph 2-4 contains guidance on changing the OMPF.  It indicates, in pertinent part, that the ABCMR may direct removal or movement of documents filed in the OMPF in the interest of justice or equity.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that a duplicate set of orders awarding him his second award of the Good Conduct Medal should be removed from his OMPF.

2.  The purpose of maintaining the OMPF is to protect the interests of both the U.S. Army and the Soldier.  In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods; and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by an appropriate authority.

3.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant's OMPF contains two sets of orders awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the same period of service.  The duplicate order was recently revoked by another order, thus creating a cluttered OMPF.  There is no harm to the Army or to the Soldier if the duplicate order and the order that revoked it are removed from his OMPF.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to relief.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Permanent Orders 119-00237, issued by Headquarters, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, dated 29 April 1997 and Permanent Order 347-001, issued by Task Force Hammer, 62nd Engineer Combat Battalion (Heavy), Forward Operating Base Sharana, Afghanistan, dated 12 December 2008, from his OMPF.


															XXX
      ______________________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000414



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000414



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009232C070206

    Original file (20050009232C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s request to have a memorandum, dated 19 November 1996 pertaining to denial of award to the AGCM removed from his records was carefully considered. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Department of the Army, 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry, Fort Drum, New York, memorandum dated 19 November 1996 and titled Denial of Good Conduct Medal, be removed from the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060003324

    Original file (20060003324.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that an erroneously published Good Conduct Medal permanent orders and a revocation of these permanent orders be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's motive for requesting removal of the erroneously published permanent order and the revocation of these permanent orders is to clear his file to make it easier for the promotion selection board to review his files. The applicant's request for removal of Permanent Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016622

    Original file (20080016622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that 801st Brigade Support Battalion [BSB], 4th Brigade Combat Team [BCT] (Currahee), 101st Airborne Division [ABN DIV] (AASLT) [Air Assault], Forward Operating Base [FOB] Sharana, Afghanistan Permanent Orders 165-12, dated 13 June 2008, be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF) on file in the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS). The applicant's military personnel record shows she initially enlisted in the Regular Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022130

    Original file (20100022130.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 24 May 2001 to 23 May 2004 under Permanent Orders 210-005, dated 28 July 2004. The evidence of record also shows the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 24 May 2004 to 23 May 2007 under Permanent Orders 254-07, dated 11 September 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000986

    Original file (20070000986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 13 April 2007, that shows Item 27 (Reentry Code) of the applicant’s DD Form 214, with an effective date of 16 November 2006, was corrected to show “RE 3.” As a result, the Reentry Code will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings. Army Achievement Medal Certificate issued under the authority of Headquarters, 44th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008004

    Original file (20080008004.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Certificate for The Meritorious Service Medal issued by Permanent Orders 215-10, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, NY, dated 3 August 2007, be removed from his records. The applicant provides Orders 235-03, Headquarters, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, NY, dated 23 August 2007; and the Certificate for The Meritorious Service Medal, dated 3 August 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001909

    Original file (20110001909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding him the GCMDL (1st Award) were revoked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. filing in his OMPF Permanent Orders 026-01, 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015161

    Original file (20090015161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 06 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015161 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding him the second and third Army Good Conduct Medal have incorrect dates or the period of service is duplicated. The applicant’s OMPF contains: a. Bravo Detachment, 18th Personnel Services Battalion Permanent Orders Number 255-48, dated 11 September 2000, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024781

    Original file (20100024781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of duplicate orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Both orders are filed in his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Permanent Orders 271-05 issued by Headquarters, 964th Engineer Battalion, Fort Lewis, WA, dated 27 September 2000; b. removing Permanent Orders 271-05 from his OMPF; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013198C070206

    Original file (20050013198C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s record shows he was awarded the ARCOM on 2 June 1999 for meritorious service during the period 15 July 1996 to 14 July 1999. However, this is the same period as his award for the ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the award certificate pertaining to the AAM for the period 20 March 2000 to 28 April 2000, and removing the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award), Permanent Order Number...