Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511843C070209
Original file (9511843C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 2 December 1994 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted for a period of 6 years, was authorized a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-2A, and that he elected a 50 percent payment of his bonus.

3.  The applicant states, in effect, that he reenlisted on  2 December 1994 for a period of 5 years with no bonus entitlement.  He subsequently discovered that he was entitled to receive an SRB-2A based on his being ranger qualified and possessing the skill qualification identifier (SQI) of “V”.  Had he known that he was entitled to receive an SRB he would have reenlisted for a period of 6 years in order to maximize his entitlements.  In support of his application he submits a copy of the message dated         11 October 1994 which authorized the SRB effective         12 November 1994.

4.  The applicant’s military records show that he reenlisted on 2 December 1994 for a period of 5 years in the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B2V with no bonus entitlement.

5.  The Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), in a comment to this Board, advised that an SRB-2A was in effect for the applicant’s MOS at the time he reenlisted and that it is reasonable to presume that had he known he was entitled to receive an SRB, he would have reenlisted for a period of    6 years to maximize his entitlements.  The PERSCOM recommended that his request be approved.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was improperly reenlisted without bonus entitlement on 2 December 1994 since an SRB-2A was in effect for his MOS on the date of his reenlistment.

2.  It is reasonable to presume that had he known at the time that he was eligible to receive an SRB, that he would have reenlisted for a period of 6 years in order to maximize his benefits. 

3.  Likewise, had he been informed that he was entitled to receive an SRB, he would have been afforded the opportunity to elect the method of payment he desired.

4.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the 2 December 1994 reenlistment contract of the individual concerned to show that he reenlisted for a period of 6 years with entitlement to an SRB-2A, in MOS 11B, SQI “V”, with a 50 percent payment option.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605175C070209

    Original file (9605175C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her reenlistment contract dated 13 May 1994 be corrected to reflect that she was authorized a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-3A. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted on 29 August 1990 for training as a counterintelligence agent (97B). At the time the applicant reenlisted to meet the service remaining requirements for an overseas assignment, it was not known that she would be occupying an airborne position (SQI “P”).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511845C070209

    Original file (9511845C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that recoupment of the unearned portion of his selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) be stopped and that the debt be remitted. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are reclassified by the Department into a different MOS to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079741C070215

    Original file (2002079741C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of her remaining Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitled to her in accordance with regulation. The applicant's DA Form 3340 (Request for Regular Army Reenlistment or Extension), dated 13 March 1991, shows that she reenlisted for the second time for a period of 6 years to satisfy her service remaining requirement for the AMEDD College Program. The applicant provided a copy of memorandum from the OTSG, dated 3 December 1991, Subject: Release from the AMEDD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607659C070209

    Original file (9607659C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that upon completion of his Bonus Extension and Retraining (BEAR) Program training in MOS 91C, he was offered the option to reenlist in the pay grade of E-4 the day before graduation. On 6 December 1991 the applicant reenlisted for the first time for a period of 4 years with no entitlement to an SRB. The PERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s reenlistment contract of 6 December 1991 be corrected to reflect that he reenlisted on 1 July 1989 for a period of 5 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605942C070209

    Original file (9605942C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 21 November 1991 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) of 2A. The applicant states that at the time of his reenlistment on 21 November 1991, he was informed that he was not entitled to receive an SRB. Accordingly, it would be equitable and just to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was authorized to receive the SRB-2A that was in effect...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607683C070209

    Original file (9607683C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state that had he known he required an additional 9 months to attend the school, he would have reenlisted for 4 years instead of 3 years in order to maximize his bonus entitlements. The applicant’s military records show that after serving 3 years, 7 months, and 26 days of total active service, he reenlisted on 3 January 1996 for a period of 3 years under the Army service school reenlistment option (Arabic language school) in military occupational specialty 98G, with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608480C070209

    Original file (9608480C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, because the applicant reenlisted for 2 years instead of 3 years, he did not meet the minimum requirement of reenlisting for a minimum of 3 years to qualify for payment of the SRB. Had the applicant been informed that he would not have been eligible to qualify for an SRB by reenlisting for only 2 years, he could have requested an exception to the RCP to be reenlisted for a period of 3 years so as to qualify for payment of the SRB. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072881C070403

    Original file (2002072881C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: It states, in pertinent part, that the Enlistment Bonus is an enlistment incentive offered to those enlisting in the Regular Army for duty in a specific MOS. Army Regulation 601-280 sets forth the basic authority for the Army Enlistment Program for all military personnel of the Active Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605188C070209

    Original file (9605188C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    She goes on to state that she believes that she has been unfairly assessed in the recoupment of her SRB because she had served 4 years of her 6-year reenlistment and had reclassified to a shortage MOS. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608164C070209

    Original file (9608164C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he reenlisted on 7 December 1995 for a period of 5 years because he was not properly informed that he was eligible to reenlist for 6 years and that had he known he could have reenlisted for 6 years, he would have done so in order to maximize his bonus entitlements. It opined that the applicant was eligible to reenlist for 6 years and that the career counselor failed to properly advise the applicant of the benefit of maximizing his bonus entitlements. The applicant...