Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608164C070209
Original file (9608164C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests correction of his 7 December 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted for a period of 6 years instead of 5 years.

3.  The applicant states that he reenlisted on 7 December 1995 for a period of 5 years because he was not properly informed that he was eligible to reenlist for 6 years and that had he known he could have reenlisted for 6 years, he would have done so in order to maximize his bonus entitlements.  In support of his application he submits a statement from his career counselor.

4.  The applicant’s military records show that after serving 9 years, 5 months, and 25 days of total active service, he reenlisted on 7 December 1995 for a period of 5 years in military occupational specialty 11B3V, with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-2B.

5.  The supporting statement submitted by the applicant from his career counselor indicates that the reenlistment counselor failed to counsel the applicant on his bonus entitlements.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM).  It opined that the applicant was eligible to reenlist for 6 years and that the career counselor failed to properly advise the applicant of the benefit of maximizing his bonus entitlements.  The PERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s term of reenlistment be increased to 6 years and that he be authorized the additional bonus entitlements.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was properly reenlisted on 7 December 1995.  However, he was not properly advised of the benefits of maximizing his bonus entitlements. 

2.  Had the applicant been properly advised of the aforementioned requirement, he could have reenlisted for a period of 6 years and would have received the additional bonus entitlements.  However, by virtue of not being properly counseled, he was denied a benefit that he otherwise would have qualified for.

3.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the 7 December 1995 reenlistment contract of the individual concerned to reflect that he reenlisted for a period of 6 years instead of 5 years, and that he be paid his additional bonus entitlements.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607683C070209

    Original file (9607683C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state that had he known he required an additional 9 months to attend the school, he would have reenlisted for 4 years instead of 3 years in order to maximize his bonus entitlements. The applicant’s military records show that after serving 3 years, 7 months, and 26 days of total active service, he reenlisted on 3 January 1996 for a period of 3 years under the Army service school reenlistment option (Arabic language school) in military occupational specialty 98G, with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606357C070209

    Original file (9606357C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 28 November 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted on 4 December 1995 with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-2B. The supporting statements from the applicant’s chain of command (lieutenant colonel to lieutenant general) all attest that the applicant was scheduled to reenlist on 22 December 1995 and that because he was hand-picked for deployment to Hungary, he was advised to reenlist...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605622C070209

    Original file (9605622C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 12 December 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted on 9 January 1996 for a period of 6 years instead of 4 years. It opined, in effect, that a SRB-1B had been authorized for the applicant’s MOS on 1 January 1996 and had the applicant applied for a waiver to reenlist under his 90-day window, an exception would have been granted. It goes on to state that personnel are not authorized to reenlist outside of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511843C070209

    Original file (9511843C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 2 December 1994 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted for a period of 6 years, was authorized a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-2A, and that he elected a 50 percent payment of his bonus. The applicant states, in effect, that he reenlisted on 2 December 1994 for a period of 5 years with no bonus entitlement. Had he known that he was entitled to receive an SRB he would have reenlisted for a period of 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607659C070209

    Original file (9607659C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that upon completion of his Bonus Extension and Retraining (BEAR) Program training in MOS 91C, he was offered the option to reenlist in the pay grade of E-4 the day before graduation. On 6 December 1991 the applicant reenlisted for the first time for a period of 4 years with no entitlement to an SRB. The PERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s reenlistment contract of 6 December 1991 be corrected to reflect that he reenlisted on 1 July 1989 for a period of 5 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063146C070421

    Original file (2001063146C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his 27 October 1982 reenlistment date be changed to 27 November 1982 or later and he be paid the bonus for which he reenlisted. The applicant states that he reenlisted on 27 October 1982 for a bonus. On 27 October 1982, he reenlisted for 6 years for the Regular Army Reenlistment Option and a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2010-059

    Original file (2010-059.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record also contains a Page 7 documenting SRB counseling on April 15, 2009, and stating that he would receive an SRB based on 22 months of newly obligated service as a result of reenlisting for 4 years. The Page 7 also states that he was eligible to reenlist or extend his enlistment “for a maximum of 4 years.” The signatures on the reenlistment contract are dated April 15, 2009, but the typed date of reenlistment on the front page is July 12, 2011. In response to the JAG’s...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-121

    Original file (2005-121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated April 5, 2006, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record so that he will be entitled to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) for reenlisting on his sixth active duty anniversary in May 2001 and a Zone B SRB for reenlisting on his tenth active duty anniversary in May 2005.1 The applicant alleged that he was eligible for a Zone A SRB when he extended his original...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511955C070209

    Original file (9511955C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his retention NCO miscalculated his service and thus misinformed him of the number of years he would be required to reenlist for in order to receive the SRB for his MOS. Although his reenlistment contract indicates that he was entitled to receive an SRB, he was subsequently informed that he would have had to reenlist for 4 years in order to qualify for the SRB. The Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), in a comment to this Board, advised in effect, that the...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-016

    Original file (2009-016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the JAG recommended that the Board correct the applicant’s record by voiding his June 23, 2007, extension contract and his March 9, 2009, reenlistment contract, and entering a six-year extension contract dated July 17, 2007, for a Zone A SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 304/07. The Board finds that when the applicant signed the 30-month extension contract on June 23, 2007, to obligate service for the transfer to Petaluma, he should have received SRB counseling pursuant to Article 3.C.3....