Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607683C070209
Original file (9607683C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests correction of his 4 January 1996 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted for a period of 4 years instead of 3 years.

3.  The applicant states that he reenlisted on 4 January 1996 for a period of 3 years and for an Army service school reenlistment option to attend language training.  Shortly thereafter, he was notified that he could not attend his language school unless he extended an additional 9 months to meet the service remaining requirement to attend the school. He goes on to state that had he known he required an additional 9 months to attend the school, he would have reenlisted for 4 years instead of 3 years in order to maximize his bonus entitlements.  In support of his application he submits a statement from his career counselor.

4.  The applicant’s military records show that after serving 3 years, 7 months, and 26 days of total active service, he reenlisted on 3 January 1996 for a period of 3 years under the Army service school reenlistment option (Arabic language school) in military occupational specialty 98G, with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-2A.

5.  On 6 February 1996 the applicant extended his enlistment for a period of 9 months in order to meet the service remaining requirement to attend the Arabic language course.

6.  The supporting statement submitted by the applicant from his career counselor indicates that the reenlistment counselor failed to check the service remaining requirements for attendance at the service school and thus failed to properly counsel the applicant on the minimum number of years required to reenlist for the school.

7.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM).  It opined that the career counselor failed to properly advise the applicant of the service remaining requirement for the language school and the benefit of maximizing his 

bonus entitlements.  The PERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s term of reenlistment be increased to 4 years and that he be authorized the additional bonus entitlements.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was properly reenlisted on 4 January 1996. However, he was not properly advised of the service remaining requirements for attendance at the language school and the benefits of maximizing his bonus entitlements. 

2.  Consequently, on 6 February 1996 (less than a month after his reenlistment) the applicant was required to extend his reenlistment period an additional 9 months in order to attend the school he had reenlisted for.  

3.  Had the applicant been properly advised of the aforementioned requirement, he could have reenlisted for a period of 4 years and would have received the additional bonus entitlements.  However, by virtue of extending his reenlistment, he was not entitled to receive any additional bonus entitlements.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the 4 January 1996 reenlistment contract of the individual concerned to reflect that he reenlisted for a period of 4 years instead of 3 years, and that his 6 February 1996 extension of 9 months be voided.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608164C070209

    Original file (9608164C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he reenlisted on 7 December 1995 for a period of 5 years because he was not properly informed that he was eligible to reenlist for 6 years and that had he known he could have reenlisted for 6 years, he would have done so in order to maximize his bonus entitlements. It opined that the applicant was eligible to reenlist for 6 years and that the career counselor failed to properly advise the applicant of the benefit of maximizing his bonus entitlements. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605622C070209

    Original file (9605622C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 12 December 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted on 9 January 1996 for a period of 6 years instead of 4 years. It opined, in effect, that a SRB-1B had been authorized for the applicant’s MOS on 1 January 1996 and had the applicant applied for a waiver to reenlist under his 90-day window, an exception would have been granted. It goes on to state that personnel are not authorized to reenlist outside of...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-069

    Original file (2005-069.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated November 17, 2005, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record by replacing his six- year reenlistment contract with a six-year extension contract so that he will receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 calculated with 72 months of newly obli- gated service instead of 52 months. Enclosure (1) to COMDTINST 7220.33 states that to receive a Zone A SRB, the member must...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-042

    Original file (1999-042.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On March 15, 1997, six months prior to the end of his enlistment, the applicant’s command made a page 7 entry in his record stating, “reenlistment interview conducted this date per Article 12-B-4 Personnel Manual … .” Four months later, on July 15, 1997, the applicant reenlisted for five years, through July 14, 2002. They shall sign a page 7 service record entry, enclosure (3), outlining the effect that particular action has on their SRB entitlement.” Enclosure (3) to the SRB Instruction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608480C070209

    Original file (9608480C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, because the applicant reenlisted for 2 years instead of 3 years, he did not meet the minimum requirement of reenlisting for a minimum of 3 years to qualify for payment of the SRB. Had the applicant been informed that he would not have been eligible to qualify for an SRB by reenlisting for only 2 years, he could have requested an exception to the RCP to be reenlisted for a period of 3 years so as to qualify for payment of the SRB. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607659C070209

    Original file (9607659C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that upon completion of his Bonus Extension and Retraining (BEAR) Program training in MOS 91C, he was offered the option to reenlist in the pay grade of E-4 the day before graduation. On 6 December 1991 the applicant reenlisted for the first time for a period of 4 years with no entitlement to an SRB. The PERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s reenlistment contract of 6 December 1991 be corrected to reflect that he reenlisted on 1 July 1989 for a period of 5 years...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2010-059

    Original file (2010-059.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record also contains a Page 7 documenting SRB counseling on April 15, 2009, and stating that he would receive an SRB based on 22 months of newly obligated service as a result of reenlisting for 4 years. The Page 7 also states that he was eligible to reenlist or extend his enlistment “for a maximum of 4 years.” The signatures on the reenlistment contract are dated April 15, 2009, but the typed date of reenlistment on the front page is July 12, 2011. In response to the JAG’s...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-121

    Original file (2005-121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated April 5, 2006, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record so that he will be entitled to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) for reenlisting on his sixth active duty anniversary in May 2001 and a Zone B SRB for reenlisting on his tenth active duty anniversary in May 2005.1 The applicant alleged that he was eligible for a Zone A SRB when he extended his original...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001348

    Original file (20080001348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His commander initiated an informal investigation to determine if his reenlistment was fraudulent; c. the applicant did not deliberately conceal any disqualifying factor in his reenlistment. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The IO determined that the applicant's reenlistment was neither fraudulent nor defective; rather, an erroneous reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063146C070421

    Original file (2001063146C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his 27 October 1982 reenlistment date be changed to 27 November 1982 or later and he be paid the bonus for which he reenlisted. The applicant states that he reenlisted on 27 October 1982 for a bonus. On 27 October 1982, he reenlisted for 6 years for the Regular Army Reenlistment Option and a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).