Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079741C070215
Original file (2002079741C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 19 December 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002079741


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Joyce A. Wright Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Harry B. Oberg Member
Mr. Stanley Kelley Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests payment of her remaining Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitled to her in accordance with regulation.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that she was entitled to receive an SRB in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280, Section II, paragraph 5-13c. In support of her application, she submits a copy of her enlistment contract, DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II), and a letter from the Office of the Surgeon General (OTSG), dated 3 December 1991.

4. The applicant submits an additional statement to her application. She states
that she reenlisted for a period 6 years with an SRB of 2A, in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91C and received 50% of her SRB, with an agreement to receive future installments annually on the anniversary date of her first reenlistment. She was accepted into the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Enlistment Commissioning Program (AECP) and was informed that she would have to reenlist in order to fulfill the requirements for the AMEDD Program. She reenlisted for the second time on 13 March 1991 for a period of
6 years in order to satisfy her service remaining requirements for the AECP. The faculty advisor notified her during her first semester, Fall 1991, at Florida A& M University, that she would need twenty-six months of schooling in order to obtain a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) degree.

5. The AMEDD College Program stipulated that the applicant must be able to receive a BSN within twenty-four months or less after being accepted into the program. She wrote a letter to the AMEDD Student Detachment to inform them of the school's decision and received a memorandum from OTSG notifying her that she would be released from the program. She received assignment orders in December 1991 reassigning her to Germany in the same MOS of 91C that she previously received a partial SRB bonus for. Several career counselors informed her that she was entitled to repayment of the portion of the bonus that she had not received. However, this was the first time that she was aware of her rights for repayment and requests assistance in this matter.

6. The applicant’s military records show she enlisted on 19 March 1985, as a practical nurse, in MOS (91C), for a period of 3 years. She reenlisted on 8 April 1988 for a period of 6 years, in the same MOS, with an SRB of 2A, and elected 50 percent pay of her SRB. She reenlisted the second time on 13 March 1991 for a period of 6 years. She continues to serve and is presently assigned to Fort Sam Houston, Texas.





7. Item 8b (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 8 April 1988,
shows the remarks "The Conus (Continental United States) Station-of-Choice Reenlistment Option, Letterman Army Medical Center, California RCN: 734035 SRB 2A, MOS 91C No Waiver 1st Reenlistment Soldier elected 50 percent payment of SRB" which indicates that the applicant was entitled to an enlistment bonus (EB).

8. Item 8 of her DD Form 4/1, dated 13 March 1991, shows the remarks "Regular Army Reenlistment Option No Bonus Entitlements No Waiver 2nd Reenlistment."

9. The applicant's DA Form 3340 (Request for Regular Army Reenlistment or Extension), dated 13 March 1991, shows that she reenlisted for the second time for a period of 6 years to satisfy her service remaining requirement for the AMEDD College Program.

10. Item 35 (Effective Date/Duty MOS/Principal Duty/Organization and Station) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows the that she was a student at the AMEDDD Student Detachment at Fort Sam Houston, Texas from 19 August 1991 to 26 February 1992.

11. The applicant provided a copy of memorandum from the OTSG, dated 3 December 1991, Subject: Release from the AMEDD Enlisted Commissioning Program. The OTSG stated that one of the most important conditions of the program was that soldiers must be able to finish their BSN in twenty-four months or less. The Army closely monitors the "Student Account" of soldiers to ensure a balance between soldiers in training and the operating strength. The applicant, unfortunately, did not complete the prerequisite courses required by Florida
A & M University. Their recalculated time required for the applicant to complete the BSN was greater than twenty-four months. The AMEDD Student Detachment, AMEDD Center and School, Fort Sam Houston, Texas would issue reassignment instructions. The applicant may reapply to the AECP when she has obtained enough credits to allow her to complete the program within twenty-four months.

12. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was provided by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), Retention Management Division.
PERSCOM stated that the applicant's request to receive the remaining SRB for MOS 91C was approved. The applicant was entitled to the SRB at the time she returned to an enlisted status. In accordance with Army Regulation 601-280, chapter 5-13c "the entitlement to additional unpaid bonus would be reinstated and paid on a pro rata basis if the applicant was not commissioned or appointed and returns to an enlisted status in the same MOS." The applicant was returned to an enlisted status as a 91C.
13. The applicant was provided a copy of the favorable opinion for possible comment prior to consideration of her case. The applicant responded within the timeframe allotted and concurred on 9 December 2002.

14. Army Regulation 601-280 sets forth the basic authority for the Army Enlistment Program for all military personnel of the Active Army. This regulation prescribes the eligibility criteria and options currently available in the Army Reenlistment Program. Chapter 5 pertains to the Enlistment and Reenlistment Bonuses for Enlisted Personnel. Paragraph 5-13 cover recoupment from soldiers who fail to complete obligated service and correction of erroneous SRB cases. Subparagraph 5-13c states that recoupment of an unearned bonus is not required if the soldier is separated to permit acceptance of a commission or warrant appointment or to enter a program leading to a commissioned or warrant appointment. Entitlement to additional unpaid bonus is suspended and will terminate upon commissioning or appointment. However, the entitlement to additional unpaid bonus will be reinstated and paid on a pro rata basis if the soldier was not commissioned or appointed and returns to enlisted status in the same bonus MOS.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The evidence of record shows that the applicant reenlisted on 8 April 1988 for an SRB of 2A, in MOS 91C, and elected 50 percent payment of her SRB with an agreement to receive future installments annually on the anniversary date of her first reenlistment. The evidence also shows that she was accepted into the AECP and was informed that she had to reenlist in order to fulfill the requirements for the AMEDD Program.

2. The applicant reenlisted for the second time on 13 March 1991 in order to satisfy her service remaining requirements for ACEP. The faculty advisor later notified her that she needed twenty-six months of schooling in order to obtain her BSN degree. The AMEDD Program stipulated that she must be able to receive her BSN degree with twenty-four months or less after being accepted into the program.

3. The applicant wrote a letter to the AMEED Student Detachment to inform them of the school's decision and received a memorandum from the OTSG notifying her that she would be released. She was released and reassigned in her same MOS of 91C that she previously received a partial SRB.





4. The applicant's career counselors informed her that she was entitled to payment of the portion of the bonus that she had not received which she was not aware of. She was entitled to her remaining SRB of 2A, in MOS 91C, upon her return to an enlisted status in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280, chapter 5-13c. Entitlement to an additional unpaid bonus would be reinstated and paid on a pro rata basis if the applicant was not commissioned or appointed and returns to an enlisted status in the same MOS. The applicant was returned to an enlisted status in MOS 91C. Therefore, she is entitled to payment of her remaining amount of her SRB of 2A, in MOS 91C, from her first reenlistment.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing that she is entitled to payment of her remaining amount of her SRB of 2A, for MOS 91C, from her first reenlistment.

BOARD VOTE:

__ro___ ___ho__ ___sk___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr.__
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002079741
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20021219
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 1025
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607659C070209

    Original file (9607659C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that upon completion of his Bonus Extension and Retraining (BEAR) Program training in MOS 91C, he was offered the option to reenlist in the pay grade of E-4 the day before graduation. On 6 December 1991 the applicant reenlisted for the first time for a period of 4 years with no entitlement to an SRB. The PERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s reenlistment contract of 6 December 1991 be corrected to reflect that he reenlisted on 1 July 1989 for a period of 5 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003645

    Original file (20130003645.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-7 (Incentive Programs), paragraph 7-3(c) discusses eligibility and states applicants must "Execute [a] DA Form 5536-R." Paragraph 7-4 provides guidelines for applicability and states, "(a) To apply for participation in [the] HPLR Program, the eligible officer will complete [a] DA Form 5536-R. (b) The agreement should be executed on assignment to the Selected Reserve or thereafter meeting all eligibility criteria. Unfortunately, when the applicant signed for the special...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510227C070209

    Original file (9510227C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 15 September 1987 the applicant submitted a request for Regular Army reenlistment based on his approved request for reclassification and approval to attend an Army service school for training in MOS 91C from 1 November 1987 through 14 December 1988. It opined, in effect, that the applicant attended training under a reclassification action and that he was not eligible for entry into the BEAR program due to his time in service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511845C070209

    Original file (9511845C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that recoupment of the unearned portion of his selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) be stopped and that the debt be remitted. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are reclassified by the Department into a different MOS to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605182C070209

    Original file (9605182C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, she submitted her request for reclassification from the MOS of a personnel management specialist (75C) to MOS 91C. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded: 1. The applicant was properly enlisted in the pay grade of E-3 in MOS 75C at the time of her enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006413

    Original file (20130006413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states a. According to the ARNG AMEDD Officer Incentive Programs for FY08, she was eligible for both the HPLR and the Special Pay Incentive and would have received both if her paperwork had been completed correctly at the time of her accession into the ARNG. According to NGB Incentives Branch, she has a USAREC Form 1252 and USAREC board results which show the intent to contract for the Special Pay and the HPLR benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605175C070209

    Original file (9605175C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her reenlistment contract dated 13 May 1994 be corrected to reflect that she was authorized a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-3A. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted on 29 August 1990 for training as a counterintelligence agent (97B). At the time the applicant reenlisted to meet the service remaining requirements for an overseas assignment, it was not known that she would be occupying an airborne position (SQI “P”).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003679

    Original file (20140003679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. She requests relief from recoupment and states that had she not received erroneous advice she would have served out the entire term of the original 2006 contract and the Government would have paid the consecutive HPLRP contract to pay off her student loans in October 2010. She has remained in good standing and would have been fully qualified to receive the Special Pay on her anniversary dates in October 2010 through October 2012 with completion of that contract in October 2013. d. A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072517C070403

    Original file (2002072517C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she initiated a SLRP contract for $20,000.00 as indicated in the DA Form 5261-4-R (Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum) she includes with her application. In a 30 May 2001 memorandum the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) Office at Fort McCoy stated that although the applicant’s DA Form 5261-4-R was executed with an entitlement of $20,000, she was only eligible for a $10,000 entitlement and payments would be made for that entitlement. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605188C070209

    Original file (9605188C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    She goes on to state that she believes that she has been unfairly assessed in the recoupment of her SRB because she had served 4 years of her 6-year reenlistment and had reclassified to a shortage MOS. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are...