2. The applicant requests, in effect, that recoupment of the unearned portion of his selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) be stopped and that the debt be remitted.
3. The applicant states that he reenlisted on 14 February 1994 for a period of 6 years with entitlement to an SRB-2A in military occupational specialty (MOS) 97B (counterintelligence special agent). On 16 June 1995, after undergoing a selection and qualification process, he reclassified to MOS 95D (Criminal Investigation Command Special Agent) which also has an SRB-2A. He goes on to state that he is serving in a shortage MOS which apparently best serves the needs of the Army, since the Department deemed it appropriate to approve his reclassification. He also states that although he realizes that he will not be entitled to any further payments, the recoupment action will impose an undue financial hardship on him and his family.
4. The applicants military records show that he reenlisted on 14 February 1994 for a period of 6 years with entitlement to an SRB-2A in military occupational specialty (MOS) 97B. After serving approximately 1 year of his reenlistment, he voluntarily requested reclassification to the shortage specialty of 95D, which also has an SRB-2A. His request was approved by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM). After being reclassified to MOS 95D, he was transferred to Panama, where he received notification from the finance office that he would have to pay back the unearned portion of the SRB that he had already been paid.
5. In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the PERSCOM. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Since the applicants reclassification was voluntary, recoupment was required. The PERSCOM recommended that his request be denied.
6. Army Regulation 601-280 serves as the authority for the SRB program. It states, in pertinent part, that a soldier who voluntarily reclassifies and fails to complete the obligated service for which the SRB was paid will refund that percentage of the bonus for which he or she did not fulfill the agreement. Soldiers who are bonus recipients may voluntarily reclassify provided they volunteer in writing and agree to recoupment of the unearned portion of the bonus. It also states, in paragraph 8-23, that a soldier need not forfeit any portion of his or her bonus when utilization or reclassification is directed by the Department in another MOS to meet CONUS, overseas, or other mission requirements.
7. Army Regulation 600-200 serves as the authority for reclassification of enlisted personnel. It states, in pertinent part, that reclassification of a primary MOS is prohibited during the period of service for which a soldier has received an SRB. However, soldiers requesting reclassification into MOS 95D may request reclassification at anytime regardless of the status of their PMOS.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicant was properly reclassified into a shortage MOS within his career management field and was aware that he would no longer be entitled to receive
anymore SRB payments, he apparently was unaware that he would have to repay the unearned portion of the SRB payments he had already received.
2. Consequently, the recoupment action is creating a financial burden on the applicant that he may otherwise have been able to avoid, had he known about the recoupment policy before submitting his request for reclassification.
3. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are reclassified by the Department into a different MOS to meet the needs of the Department, and given that he reclassified into a shortage MOS that has the same SRB and that allows reclassification under all circumstances, it would be appropriate and just to stop the action to recoup the unearned portion of his SRB and allow the applicant to keep that portion of his bonus as an exception to policy. Additionally, any SRB funds recouped from him as a result of his reclassification should be returned to him.
4. In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate and just to correct the applicants records as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by remitting the unearned portion of the SRB owed by the individual concerned which was incurred as a result of his reclassification on or about 16 June 1995.
2. That any portion of the remitted amount that has already been collected be repaid to him.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605188C070209
She goes on to state that she believes that she has been unfairly assessed in the recoupment of her SRB because she had served 4 years of her 6-year reenlistment and had reclassified to a shortage MOS. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079741C070215
The applicant requests payment of her remaining Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitled to her in accordance with regulation. The applicant's DA Form 3340 (Request for Regular Army Reenlistment or Extension), dated 13 March 1991, shows that she reenlisted for the second time for a period of 6 years to satisfy her service remaining requirement for the AMEDD College Program. The applicant provided a copy of memorandum from the OTSG, dated 3 December 1991, Subject: Release from the AMEDD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072881C070403
The Board considered the following evidence: It states, in pertinent part, that the Enlistment Bonus is an enlistment incentive offered to those enlisting in the Regular Army for duty in a specific MOS. Army Regulation 601-280 sets forth the basic authority for the Army Enlistment Program for all military personnel of the Active Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605175C070209
The applicant requests that her reenlistment contract dated 13 May 1994 be corrected to reflect that she was authorized a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-3A. The applicants military records show that she enlisted on 29 August 1990 for training as a counterintelligence agent (97B). At the time the applicant reenlisted to meet the service remaining requirements for an overseas assignment, it was not known that she would be occupying an airborne position (SQI P).
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605486C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) that was recouped from him be given back to him. APPLICANT STATES: That the unearned portion of his SRB was recouped from him under the false assumption that his separation was due to his own misconduct. In view of the preceding, the applicants separation for weight control failure was properly considered voluntary for the purpose of the collection of the unearned portion of his SRB monies.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510227C070209
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 15 September 1987 the applicant submitted a request for Regular Army reenlistment based on his approved request for reclassification and approval to attend an Army service school for training in MOS 91C from 1 November 1987 through 14 December 1988. It opined, in effect, that the applicant attended training under a reclassification action and that he was not eligible for entry into the BEAR program due to his time in service. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607659C070209
The applicant states that upon completion of his Bonus Extension and Retraining (BEAR) Program training in MOS 91C, he was offered the option to reenlist in the pay grade of E-4 the day before graduation. On 6 December 1991 the applicant reenlisted for the first time for a period of 4 years with no entitlement to an SRB. The PERSCOM recommended that the applicants reenlistment contract of 6 December 1991 be corrected to reflect that he reenlisted on 1 July 1989 for a period of 5 years...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010241
On 6 July 2006, by memorandum, her immediate commander notified her of his intent to initiate separation action against her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-8, by reason of parenthood (failure to maintain an FCP). On 11 July 2006, her immediate commander initiated separation action against her under the provisions of chapter 5-8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of failure to maintain an FCP. With respect to the separation code, the evidence of record shows the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000397
The separation authority initiated action to involuntarily discharge the applicant due to parenthood and directed that, upon the applicants separation, action would be taken to recoup any unearned portions of enlistment/ reenlistment bonuses, if received. Evidence of record shows the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army on 28 March 2006 for a selective reenlistment bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608515C070209
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he reenlisted on 22 November 1994 for a period of 3 years instead of 2 years and that he be authorized repayment of $326.94 that was recouped from his pay as an unearned enlistment bonus. It opined, in effect, that subsequent to the applicants reenlistment, the applicable regulation was changed to allow soldiers serving in the pay grade of E-4 who enlisted for a period of 6 years to reenlist for a period of 3 years...