APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the honorable discharge he received at the expiration of his term of service (ETS) be corrected to a medical retirement.
APPLICANT STATES: He should have been medically retired for facial scars, migraine headaches, and problems with his neck, back and right knee.
In support of his request he submits an extract from his military health records pertaining to the emergency surgery he was provided when a practice grenade from a 40 millimeter grenade launcher struck him in the face at close range. He also submits a letter from a civilian physician in which the physician stated that the applicant had reported having neck pain and severe migraine headaches since his injury in the Army. The applicant had also reported that while working his civilian job, he had experienced numbness and tingling and night pain in his hands. He received an operation to relieve that pain on 10 September 1993, a carpal tunnel release. He had been working for a company operating a pipe line, with duties consisting of operating a jack hammer and using a pick and shovel. The physician diagnosed the applicant as having degenerative joint disease of his cervical spine, a condition he attributed to his injury in the Army, and post right carpal tunnel release, a condition he attributed to his activities while he worked on the pipe line.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 November 1985, was awarded the military occupational specialty of infantryman, was promoted to pay grade E-4, and was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 17 February 1989 at his ETS.
Army Regulation 635-40, in effect at the time provided pertinently that while a member may have medical conditions or physical impairments ratable under the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities, he will not be retired or separated because of those conditions or impairments unless they render him unfit because of physical disability. Further, the continuous performance of duty by a member whose service may soon be terminated for reasons other than physical disability gives rise to a presumption of fitness which may be overcome if the evidence established (a) That the member, in fact, was physically unable to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade, or rating even though he was improperly retained in that office, rank, grade or rating for period of time, or (b) acute, grave, illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition that occurred immediately prior to or coincidentally with the members separation for reasons other than physical disability rendered him unfit for further duty.
Title 10, United States Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent.
The VA is the agency which is responsible for rating medical conditions which are related to service. The VA evaluates a veteran throughout his lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's latest examinations and findings.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant sustained a serious injury while on active duty for which he received extensive medical care.
2. However, he was apparently returned to duty as evidenced by his successful completion of his term of service. His medical fitness is also indicated by his choice of a civilian occupation which required strenuous, physical labor.
3. Since the applicant's medical condition was not physically unfitting at the time of his separation, there was no basis to consider him for medical retirement or separation.
4. The proper agency to handle any problems he is currently experiencing from the injury he received while on active duty is the VA.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01138
The PEB adjudicated the chronic neck pain and migraine headaches conditions as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, with likely application of AR 635-40 and/or the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The conditions, right carpal tunnel syndrome and OSA as requested for consideration meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, are addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting neck pain and migraine headache...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020791
The applicant provides copies his accident report, 45 pages of medical records, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharged from Active Duty), a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability evaluation, a Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR), CRSC application and denied, CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00377
After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence, the Board recommends a service disability rating of 20% for the cervical (neck) condition. The Board determined therefore that none of the stated conditions were subject to service disability rating. The PEB disability description specified that there was ROM limited by pain and that the PEB used the PT exam (which was closer to the date of separation) as their rating exam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009613
He acknowledged: * he reviewed the contents of the MEB, physical profile, and narrative summary; he understood the PEB would only consider the conditions listed on his physical profile * the physical profile included all his conditions and whether or not they meet retention standards; the conditions that did not meet retention standards were properly listed * he provided all medical documents in his possession to be included in the MEB; he agreed that the MEB accurately covered his medical...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00015
The Formal PEB (FPEB) found the back pain and neck pain conditions unfitting, and rated them 10% each. The CI was thus medically separated with a 20% combined disability rating. In the matter of the migraine headaches, carpal tunnel syndrome, the ten other medically acceptable conditions cited in the MEB, and any other conditions eligible for Board consideration, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation.
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2005-024
Because DM requiring glucose-lowering medications as well as dietary control is a disqualifying condition for retention on active duty under Article 3.F.10.e. He noted that the PDES Manual requires the Coast Guard to use the DVA’s VASRD schedule when assigning disability ratings. The Board begins each case presuming that the applicant’s military records are correct and that Coast Guard officials, including his doctors and medical evaluation boards, have acted correctly and in good faith in...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00095
The headache, pinched nerve and herniated discs in the back and neck, and carpal tunnel syndrome bilaterally conditions as requested for consideration meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview and are addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting condition of fibromyalgia. There is no evidence in the record of a headache, back, or neck condition separate from the fibromyalgia condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00032
CI was referred to the Army PEB, was found unfit for his neck condition, and was rated at 10%. These other conditions are all judged by the Board to be not unfitting at the time of separation from service, and are not relevant for disability rating. In the matter of the Chronic Neck Pain condition, the Board recommends by unanimous decision a rating of 10%, coded 5243 IAW VASRD §4.71a-20.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01673
SEPARATION DATE: 20061219 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Neck Pain and Headaches Condition .
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00463
The migraine and cubital tunnel syndrome conditions, as requested for consideration, meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, are addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting chronic neck and upper back pain condition. The PT examination used in the NARSUM was performed 10 months prior to separation and only 3.5 months after the CI’s second surgical procedure to her neck. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be...