Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01503
Original file (PD-2014-01503.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01503
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141209
SEPARATION DATE: 20080904


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (11B/Infantry) medically separated for a right ankle condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right ankle condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also forwarded “post-concussion and sleep disorder,” to the PEB as medically acceptable. The Informal PEB adjudicated “right ankle pain” as unfitting, rated at 10%, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.59. The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting ankle condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – dated 20080521
 VA – (8 mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Ankle Pain 5099-5003 10% Status Post Right Ankle Fracture 5271 0% 20071204
Other x 2 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 7
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20090114 ( most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Ankle Pain. In February 2005, the CI fractured his right ankle during combative training and underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a cast placement for 8 weeks. When the cast was removed, he began physical therapy (PT). The CI deployed to Iraq from November 2005 to November 2006, during this deployment he began to experience the right ankle pain that progressively worsen. After his return to the US, he was treated with exercise, medication and joint injection. However, the ankle pain persisted and an MEB was initiated. During VA Compensation and Pension exam in December 2007, the CI reported his right ankle pain was aggravated by running, walking, bearing weight and weather changes. On physical examination (PE) of the right ankle, the examiner noted there was no tenderness to palpation, gait and heel/toe walking was normal. Range-of-motion (ROM) and muscle strength were normal. There were no limitations in ROM from fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance or pain. The MEB narrative summary, dictated on 31 March 2008, the CI complained of constant right ankle pain that was worse with running or prolonged standing. On PE, there was some tenderness of the lateral malleolus, but no joint swelling. Neurological exam (motor and sensory) was normal. ROM testing showed mild limitation of inversion, eversion, and dorsiflexion due to pain. . The ROM measurements, obtained on 1 May 2008, by PT were the following:

Right Ankle ROM
(Degrees)		 VA C&P ~ 9 mos. Pre-Sep
(2007120 4 )
 PT ~ 4 mos. Pre-Sep
(20080501)
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) 20 85
Plantar Flexion (45) 45 30
§4.71a Rating 10 % * 10 % *
       *10% based on VASRD §4.40 (Functional loss), §4.45 (The joints), and §4.59 (Painful motion) invalid font number 31502

The Board carefully examined all available evidence and directs attention to its rating recommendation. The Army PEB and the VA chose different coding and rating options for the right ankle condition. The Board considered the results of the two ankle ROM examinations shown above. At both exams, the CI had right ankle dorsiflexion of 20 degrees (or greater) and right ankle plantar flexion of 30 degrees (or greater). It was documented in the treatment record that the CI’s gait was normal. After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that the right ankle condition was essentially non-compensable based solely on the VASRD §4.71a codes 5270 through 5274, for the ankle. However; IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, a part of the musculoskeletal system which becomes painful on use must be regarded as seriously disabled. A 10% rating is warranted when there is satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major joint. All Board members agreed that a rating of 10% was appropriate for the right ankle condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a higher rating, since the record did not show sufficient evidence of a disabling ankle condition which would justify a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends no change to the PEB adjudication of the unfitting right ankle condition. IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, the right ankle meets criteria for a 10% rating due to painful motion of a major joint.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45 and §4.59, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140316, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





                                    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                    President
                                    Physical Disability Board of Review
         SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150007569 (PD201401503)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                    Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                    (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA
        

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03858

    Original file (PD-2014-03858.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (see rating chart below) for PEB adjudication.The Informal PEBadjudicatedthe left ankle pain as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Sep(20081011)Dorsiflexion (20 Normal)1515 or 20*Plantar Flexion (45)5040 or 45**the CI had two separate VA C&P exams on 20081011, with different ankle ROM resultsThe Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01155

    Original file (PD2012 01155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Twoleft ankle conditions, characterized as “chronic ankle pain, left” and “synovitis of the left ankle,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The hepatitis C condition was not specifically requested by the CI, and will not be adjudicated by the Board. The Navy PEB and the VA chose different coding options for the unfitting left ankle condition, but both assigned a disability rating of 10%.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00310

    Original file (PD-2012-00310.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was treated with injections and physical therapy (PT), but did not significantly improve so an Condition Neck pain Left shoulder pain Code 5237 5099‐5003 Rating 10% 10% ↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ Combined: 20% Condition Code 5243 Cervical spine condition (C6‐C7) Left shoulder, anterior labral tear Left arm radiculopathy Paralumbar muscle spasms Tinnitus Right shoulder tendonitis 8515 5237 6260 5024 0% x 2 / Not Service‐Connected x 3 5299‐5203 Combined:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00615

    Original file (PD2012-00615.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), who found the right ankle instability unfitting and rated it 0%. this injury is permanent as listed in the findings of the Physical Evaluation Board which I have enclosed.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01080

    Original file (PD-2014-01080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At that exam, the CI’s gait was normal. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01639

    Original file (PD2012-01639.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating determinations at the time of separation. Right Ankle Condition. Other PEB Conditions.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01745

    Original file (PD-2014-01745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hyperlipidemia was submitted by the MEB as medically acceptable.The Informal PEBadjudicated “right knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, and “left knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). On PE of the knees, the left knee was normal in appearance. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00781

    Original file (PD2011-00781.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review, as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. Right Knee Condition . At that exam, the right knee ROM failed to reach compensable levels for the VASRD codes specific to leg flexion and extension (5260 and 5261).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00457

    Original file (PD-2012-00457.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Hip (Thigh) ROM Flexion (125⁰ is normal) External Rotation Abduction (45⁰ is normal) Comment Pain with motion §4.71a Rating MEB ~4 Mos. At his May 2004 MEB exam, the CI did have a painful “pop” with hip motion. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE RATING 5099‐5003 COMBINED 10% 10% Chronic Pain, Left Hip UNFITTING CONDITION The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02362

    Original file (PD-2014-02362.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The “right wrist injury with continued pain”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines...