Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00457
Original file (PD-2012-00457.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

BRANCH OF SERVICE:   ARMY  
SEPARATION DATE:  20040912 

 
NAME:  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
CASE NUMBER:  PD1200457 
BOARD DATE:  20121212 
 
 
SUMMARY  OF  CASE:    Data  extracted  from  the  available  evidence  of  record  reflects  that  this 
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E‐5 (11B/Infantryman) medically separated for 
chronic  left  hip  pain.    He  was  treated,  but  did  not  improve  adequately  to  fully  perform  his 
military duties or meet physical fitness standards.  He was issued a permanent L3 profile and 
underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).  The MEB found the internal snapping of the left 
hip condition, and patellofemoral arthrosis of the left knee condition as medically unacceptable 
IAW AR 40‐501, and referred him to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).  Two other conditions 
(intermittent mechanical low back pain, and cold intolerance after amputation of the tip of the 
left  long  finger  conditions)  identified  in  the  rating  chart  below,  were  also  identified  and 
forwarded by the MEB as meeting retention standards.  The PEB adjudicated the chronic pain, 
left  hip  condition  as  unfitting,  rated  10%  with  application  of  the  US  Army  Physical  Disability 
Agency (USAPDA) Pain Policy/Guidance Memorandum #13.  The other three conditions were all 
adjudicated as “not unfitting.”  The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 
10% disability rating. 
 
 
CI CONTENTION:  “As an Infantry soldier of 14 years, I was limited in tasks I was able to perform 
and limited to only one event of the APFT.” 
 
 
SCOPE OF REVIEW:  The Board’s scope of review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those 
conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military 
service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be 
unfitting  by  the  PEB.”    The  unfitting  left  hip  condition  meets  the  criteria  prescribed  in  DoDI 
6040.44,  and  is  accordingly  addressed  below.    No  other  conditions  are  within  the  Board’s 
purview.  Any condition outside the Board’s defined scope of review may be eligible for future 
consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.   
 

RATING COMPARISON:   
 

Condition 

Chronic Pain, Left Hip 
Patellofemoral Arthrosis 
of the Left Knee 

(No MEB/PEB entry for Right Knee Pain) 

Intermittent Mechanical 
Low Back Pain 
Cold Intolerance After 
Amputation of the Tip of 
the Left Long Finger 

Not Unfitting 

Not Unfitting 

↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ 

Army PEB – dated 20040629 

VA (~1 Mo. Post‐Separation) – All Effective 20040913

Code 

5099‐5003 

Rating
10%

Condition

Left Hip Popping

Code 
5251 

Rating 
0%* 

Exam

20041117

Not Unfitting 

(No VA entry for Left Knee Pain) 

Residuals, Patellafracttjre, Right 
Knee with 
Degenerative Changes
Mechanical Low Back Pain 

Amputation, Distal Portion Left 
Middle Finger 
Obstructive Sleep Apnea 
Tinnitus 
Tension –Style Headaches 

5003 

5237 

5154 

6847 
6260 

8199‐8100 

10% 

0%* 

10% 

30% 
10% 
10% 

0% X 3*

Combined:  50% 

20041117

20041117

20041117 

20041117
20041117
20041117
20041117

Combined:  10% 

*Included in the total three conditions with a 0% rating percentage. 
 
 
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:   
 
Chronic Left Hip Pain.  In December 2000, the CI was injured in a motor vehicle accident (MVA).  
After the MVA, he complained of pain and popping in the left hip.  He was treated, but the left 
hip problem persisted and an MEB was started.  His MEB clinical evaluation was on 7 May 2004 
at Fort Stewart, GA.  Examination of the left hip revealed an audible and palpable “pop” with 
hip movement, and this was painful to the CI.  Range‐of‐motion (ROM) was measured and is 
summarized in the chart below.  On 17 November 2004, the CI had a VA Compensation and 
Pension (C&P) exam.  At that time, he was working as a receiving clerk, lifting a maximum of 20‐
25 lbs.  His gait and posture were normal.  Examination of the left hip showed no evidence of 
degenerative changes or instability.  ROM is summarized below.   

Left Hip (Thigh) ROM 

Flexion (125⁰ is normal) 

External Rotation 

Abduction (45⁰ is normal) 

Comment 

Pain with motion 

§4.71a Rating 

 

MEB ~4 Mos. Pre‐Sep 

(20040507)

VA C&P ~2 Mos. Post‐Sep 

(20041117) 

90⁰ 
40⁰ 
32⁰ 

10%* 

88⁰ 
60⁰ 

(not measured) 

Cramping in the groin 

0% 

  *10% based on VASRD §4.40 (Functional loss), §4.45 (The joints), and §4.59 (Painful motion) 

 
The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its 
rating recommendation based on the above evidence.  The CI’s limitation of hip motion was 
essentially  non‐compensable  based  on  the  Veterans’  Administration  Schedule  for  Rating 
Disabilities  (VASRD)  §4.71a  codes  for  loss  of  hip  and  thigh  motion  (5251,  5252,  and  5253).  
However;  IAW  VASRD  §4.40,  §4.45,  and  §4.59,  a  10%  rating  is  warranted  when  there  is 
satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major joint.  At his May 
2004  MEB  exam,  the  CI  did  have  a  painful  “pop”  with  hip  motion.    After  due  deliberation, 
considering  all  of  the  evidence  and  mindful  of  VASRD  §4.3  (reasonable  doubt),  the  Board 
concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for 
the chronic left hip pain.  
 
 

   2                                                           PD1200457 
 

BOARD FINDINGS:  IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.  As discussed above, PEB 
reliance on the USAPDA pain policy was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated 
independently of that policy by the Board.  In the matter of the chronic left hip pain and IAW 
VASRD §4.40, §4.45, §4.59, and §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the 
PEB adjudication.   
 
There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.   
 
 
RECOMMENDATION:  The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of 
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:   
 

VASRD CODE  RATING
5099‐5003 
COMBINED 

10%
10%

Chronic Pain, Left Hip 

UNFITTING CONDITION

 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
Exhibit A.  DD Form 294, dated 20120521, w/atchs 
Exhibit B.  Service Treatment Record 
Exhibit C.  Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SFMR‐RB 
 

 
 

 

 

 

           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF 
           President 
           Physical Disability Board of Review 

 
 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency  

(TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA  22202‐3557 

SUBJECT:  Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130000619 (PD201200457) 

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD 
PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.  Under 

the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,   I accept the Board’s 

recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.   

This decision is final.  The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress 

who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail. 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

 
 

 

 
 

 

   3                                                           PD1200457 
 

Encl 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

     XXXXXXXXXX 

 
     Deputy Assistant Secretary 
         (Army Review Boards) 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 
CF:  

(  ) DoD PDBR 

(  ) DVA 

 
 
 
 

   4                                                           PD1200457 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01941

    Original file (PD2012 01941.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left hip was painful to motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130019920 (PD201201941)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01337

    Original file (PD-2013-01337.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Hip and Bilateral Knee pain5099-50030%Residuals, Left Hip Stress Fracture5099-501010%20011212Right Knee Chondromalacia5099-501010%20011212Left Knee Chondromalacia5099-501010%20011212Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 2 RATING: 0%RATING: 30% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20020708(most proximate to date of separation(DOS)) Left Hip and Bilateral KneePain .This CI entered the Army in May 1999. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01635

    Original file (PD-2013-01635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Physical examination of the left knee revealed full range-of-motion (ROM), with marked patellar compression pain and the knee was ligamentous stablewith no meniscal pathology.The CI was separated from service on 8 April 2004 and his VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed 6 months later in October 2004. There was no path to a higher rating for the left knee since there was no evidence of joint instability, subluxation, or other significant knee abnormality.After due...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00930

    Original file (PD-2012-00930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200930 SEPARATION DATE: 20030801 BOARD DATE: 20130328 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty CPL/E-4 (71L/Postal Operator) medically separated for chronic bilateral knee pain. The PEB combined the two chronic knee pain problems into a single unfitting condition: “Chronic bilateral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01544

    Original file (PD 2012 01544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In attempting to explain the level of pain that I sometimes experience, I consider mild pain to be a dull ache to moderate pain being more of a sharp pain/ache that results in a mild limp when walking.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00450

    Original file (PD 2012 00450.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200450 SEPARATION DATE: 20080531 BOARD DATE: 20130208 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSG/E-6 (63D30 / Field Artillery Mechanic), medically separated for “bilateral knee and left hip pain from conditions that occurred before entering the Army (EPTS [Existed Prior to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01922

    Original file (PD-2013-01922.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The exam noted full flexion and abduction, with painful ROM and an MEB was recommended.At the MEB examination on 8 April 2004, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported shoulder pain, specifically noting “cannot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01382

    Original file (PD-2013-01382.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the Board judges that two or more conditions are reasonably justified as separately unfitting, then each separate condition must be rated IAW the VASRD §4.71a. Accordingly, the Board does not recommend a separate disability rating for the functional bowel symptoms. Right Hip Pain .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01934

    Original file (PD2012 01934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition was characterized as “chronic left knee pain status post lateral release” and “iliotibial band syndrome.” These two conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. Other PEB Condition . The other PEB condition was, “Chronic left knee pain, status post lateral release.” This condition was adjudicated by the PEB as Category II (related to and contributing to the unfitting ITBS condition).The Board determined that this...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00384

    Original file (PD2011-00384.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review, as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. Left hip condition . At his Army MEB exam, the CI reported that he was having some left hip pain.