Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01301
Original file (PD-2014-01301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01301
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141218
SEPARATION DATE: 20020817


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Heavy Equipment Mechanic) medically separated for chronic cervical pain with spondylosis at C5-6, C6-7. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 profile and was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) by a MOS Medical Retention Board (MMRB). The chronic cervical pain with spondylosis at C5-6, C6- condition, characterized as “mild cervical spondylosis” and “chronic neck pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic cervical pain with spondylosis at C5-6, C6-7” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.











RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20020501
 VA - (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Cervical Pain w/Spondylosis at C5-6, C6-7 5299-5295 10% Degenerative Disc Disease Cervical Spine 5293 20% 20020627
Chronic Shoulder Pain Not Unfitting Right Shoulder Strain 5203 10% 20020627
Left Shoulder Strain 5203 10% 20020627
Bilateral Inguinal Hernias Not Unfitting Right & Left Inguinal Hernias 7338 0% 20020627
Other x 0
 Other x 3 20020627
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 20725 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Cervical Pain w/Spondylosis at C5-6, C6-7Condition. The CI experienced the insidious onset of chronic neck pain without any identifiable trauma. His duty as a heavy equipment mechanic required extensive heavy lifting. He experienced neck pain and headaches with wearing his Kevlar helmet and there were no radicular symptoms noted. Plain film X-rays and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study performed mid-2001 demonstrated mild degenerative disc changes especially at C5-7. The narrative summary prepared 4 months prior to separation noted that the CI was evaluated by an MMRB and determined that he could not be retained in the Army. The CI continued to have significant neck pain that occasionally radiated to the para-cervical region, as well as into the right shoulder. At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 2 months prior to separation, the CI reported that the CI continued to experience discomfort in the cervical spine region without radicular-type symptoms. Physical therapy and facet blocks did not produce much improvement. The pertinent physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Cervical ROM (Degrees) PT ~ 6 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 1 Mo. P re -Sep
Flex (45 Normal) 30 45
Combined (340) 200 340
Comment Pos. painful motion; Normal strength & reflexes; Decreased light touch Pos. painful motion ; Normal strength, reflexes & sensation
§4.71a Rating : old spine rules 10% or 20% (PEB 10%) 10% (VA 20%)
§4.71a Rating: current spine rules 10% 10%

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB applied the analogous VASRD code 5299-5295 (lumbosacral strain) and rated it 10% consistent with “with characteristic pain on motion.” The VA applied code 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) and rated it 20% citing “…recurring attacks of moderate degenerative disc disease.” The Board noted that the evidence does not support application of code 5293 as the CI did not have MRI findings or manifest symptoms consistent with an intervertebral disc syndrome. The 2002 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine, which must be applied to the Board’s recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44, differ significantly from the current §4.71a General Rating Formula for the Spine. The earlier criteria were subject to the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity, as opposed to the more objective current standards with quantifiable rating thresholds grounded in ROM measurements. The PEB’s application of 5295 was consistent with the 10% rating under that code as the CI did not meet the requirements for to 20% rating.
Additionally, if either code 5290 or the current rating formula for diseases of the spine were applied, the ROM measurements documented either both exam was consistent with the 10% rating under either criteria. There was no appropriate coding/rating scheme that would result in a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic cervical pain w/spondylosis at C5-6, C6-7 condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the chronic shoulder pain and bilateral inguinal hernias conditions were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard and requires a preponderance of evidence. The chronic shoulder pain and bilateral inguinal hernias conditions were not profiled or implicated in the commander’s statement and were not judged to fail retention standards. All were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance-based evidence from the record that any of these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the any of the chronic shoulder pain and bilateral inguinal hernias contended conditions and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic cervical pain w/spondylosis at C5-6, C6-7 condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended bilateral inguinal hernia and chronic shoulder pain conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140418, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




        
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB          


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150009558 (PD201401301)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00343

    Original file (PD2012-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded only one condition; “Cervical spondylosis and multilevel degenerative disk disease with previous radicular and myelopathic signs.” The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic radiating neck and shoulder pain condition as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00767

    Original file (PD 2012 00767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated “neck and shoulder pain with degenerative cervical spondylosis” as unfitting and rated 0% IAW the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, resides in evaluating the fairness of Disability Evaluation System (DES) fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00630

    Original file (PD-2014-00630.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Shoulder Condition . At the VA C&P examination, performed 16 months prior to separation, the CI reported a cervical spine injury in 1998 with continual pain accompanied by a left upper extremity radiculopathy. Based on the ROMs in the record the Board was unable to find a route to a higher rating.The MEB referred cervical spondylosis with C7-8 radiculopathy; however, the PEB noted cervical spondylosis “without significant neurologic abnormality.” The Board considered whether an...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00193

    Original file (PD2011-00193.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the cervical herniated nucleus pulposus associated with intermittent pain despite no nerve impingement condition unfitting rated at 10% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). All evidence considered there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting addition of the right upper extremity radiculopathy condition as an unfitting condition for separation rating. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00136

    Original file (PD2009-00136.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Board majority determined the Commander’s letter which stated the CI’s knee, neck, shoulder, and hand conditions prevented him from performing the duties of his rating and the required physical fitness test was sufficient evidence to determine both cervical spondylosis and C6 radiculopathy were unfitting at the time of separation. This Board member determined there was insufficient evidence to consider either Cervical Spondylosis with C5-C6 Left Foraminal Stenosis and Arthritis or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00800

    Original file (PD2011-00800.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the cervical spondylosis with neck pain and chronic mild left arm conditions as unfitting, rated at 20% for mild, incomplete paralysis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed in 2002 and although the radiologist’s report is not present in the record, both the original MEB NARSUM in May 2002 and the updated MEB NARSUM in December 2002 noted this test documented diffuse spondylitic changes from C3-4 to C6-7, severe spinal stenosis at C5-6, moderate spinal stenosis...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01694

    Original file (PD-2014-01694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRDstandards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner documented tenderness to palpation of the bilateral cervical paraspinal musculature, extending to the upper back bilaterally, with no weakness or painful motion noted.The examiner diagnosed “myofascial pain” which was treated with “trigger point...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00346

    Original file (PD2011-00346.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 0% disability rating. Right Shoulder Pain . In the matter of the neck and right shoulder condition, for a separation rating after TDRL, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated as two separate unfitting conditions with rating, by a vote of 2:1, as follows: a cervical spine condition coded 5290 and rated 10%; and, a right shoulder condition coded 5099-5003 and rated 10%; both IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00409

    Original file (PD2011-00409.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flex (0-45)No goniometrics45° (50°, 52°, 56°)35⁰*Ext (0-45)No goniometrics45° (50°, 50°, 52°)45⁰R Lat Flex (0-45)No goniometrics35° (35°, 40°, 45°)40⁰*L Lat Flex (0-45)No goniometrics35° (35°, 40°, 45°)40⁰*R Rotation (0-80)No goniometrics50° (52°, 54°, 56°)80⁰L Rotation (0-80)No goniometrics50° (52°, 54°, 56°)60⁰*COMBINED (340)260⁰300⁰C-spine MRI- degenerative disc disease, osteoarthropathyTenderness centrally C3-7; Mild paraspinal tenderness; sharp pain with lateral left bending; Mild pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01895

    Original file (PD2012 01895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board judged that the migraine headache and mild spondylosis conditions recorded in the MEB were integral, comorbid components of the FM condition and could not be reviewed separately IAW VASRD §4.14. Additionally, the CI reported upper arm pain, hip, back, and buttock pain. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130019762 (PD201201895)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR)...