Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01239
Original file (PD-2014-01239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD - 20 1 4 - 0 1239
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0206
Separation Date: 20080617


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-2 (Trainee) medically separated for a bilateral foot injury. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral foot injury, characterized as “right foot and left ankle stress reactions” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral foot injury” as unfitting, rating each foot at 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a 20% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION : “Please refer to VA Rating Decision.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20080602
 VA - (12 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Foot Injury 5284 10% Left Ankle Sprain, s/p Talus Fracture with Residual Plantar Fasciitis XX* 20% 20090529
Right Foot Injury 5284 10% Right Foot Stress Fracture, Right Fifth Metatarsal Base with Metalarsalgia XX* 10% 20090529
Right Ankle Sprain s/p Talus Fracture with Residual Plantar Fasciitis XX* 10% 20090529
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 5
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 50%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090731 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS])
 * Ratings in chart are taken from the VARD closest to separation; however Rating Codes are missing from CI packet.

ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Left Foot Injury Condition . The CI developed left ankle and foot pain during the 8th week of Basic Training due to strenuous activities . These symptoms did not exist prior to service (EPTS). The Podiatrist noted that the CI reported pain over the dorsal aspect of the forefoot, plantar aspect under the forefoot , which worsened with standing, walking and running. There were physical findings of swelling, enlargement and pain with ROM. The examiner ordered a surgical boot/shoe and an X -ray. A Bone Scan demonstrated a moderate-to- marked focal uptake of increased activity which involved the superior surface of the left talus consistent with a stress fracture. The left foot X -ray was normal. The Medical Clinic examiner documented left ankle talus head TTP. The MEB Narrative Summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 2 months prior to separation documented left ankle pain was resolving until the CI resumed light jogging and running , which made the pain worse. The CI occasionally took narcotic and non-narcotic medications for the pain. The examiner concluded that because of the functional limitations and pain associated with the CI’s condition, he could not perform his duties. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. The c ommander’s s tatement indicated that the CI did not perform any hard labor duties and was in a holding detachment pending discharge. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 11 months after separation documented that the CI reported constant pain , with cold weather and activities he would have a flare-up with swelling, weakness , an inability to stand , an inability to drive , and walking limited to 200 to 300 feet. He wore his ankle braces daily and would work at his job with pain. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

There were two range of motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.
Left Ankle ROM (Degrees) MEB 2.5 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P 11.5 Mos. Post-Sep
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) Full Range of Motion 4
Plantar Flexion (45) 10
Comment Tenderness to palpation (TTP) head of talus; N o pain ful motion ; No instability Pos. painful motion; No Deluca criteria; uses a c ane walks slowly
§4.71a Rating 10 % (PEB 10%) 10 % (VA 20%)
invalid font number 31502
The Board direct ed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the l eft f oot Injury condition as 5284 ( other f oot injuries ) and rated at 10% for “ m oderate. ” The VA considered the left ankle sprain, s/p talus fracture with residual plantar fasciitis an d rated at 20% for “…for marked limited motion of the ankle.” The Board considered the discrepancy between the PEB and VA ratings and members agreed that the PEB rating was granted after a period of significant rest , which resulted in decreased symptoms as supported by the evidence. The C&P exam occurred while the CI was working part-time as a bus driver and represents post-separation worsening. The evidence in the STR documented the CI had chronic moderate pain with functional impairment that interfered with his MOS activities. At the time of separation, the CI’s foot disability did not raise to the moderately severe level as required for the next higher 20% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left foot injury con dition.

Right Foot Injury Condition : The CI developed right ankle and foot pain during the 8th week of Basic Training due to strenuous activities. These symptoms were not EPTS. The Medical Clinic provider noted that the CI reported dorsal right midfoot pain with physical exam findings of mild swelling across the top of the metatarsals, pain with full range of motion (ROM), tenderness to palpation (TTP) and swelling . A right foot X -ray performed on the same day showed moderate degenerative changes of the first MTP joint. The Podiatrist noted that the CI reported pain over the dorsal aspect of the forefoot, plantar aspect under the forefoot which worsened with standing, walking and running. There were physical findings of the right foot arch which was lower with deformity, swelling, enlargement and pain with ROM. A Bone Scan demonstrated a moderate to marked focal uptake of increased activity which involved the superior surface of the right talus consistent with a stress fracture. The CI followed with podiatry for the remainder of 2007 and there was documentation of some improvement in the right foot pain. The initial c ommander’s s tatement indicated that the CI’s diagnosis of right foot and left ankle stress reactions limited his participation in any part of OSUT, BCT or AIT and the c ommander strongly recommended that the CI be placed in Holding Detachment. The MEB Narrative Summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 2 mon ths prior to separation documented right ankle pain was resolving until the CI resumed light jogging and running which made the pain worse. The CI occasionally took narcotic and non-narcotic medications for the pain. The examiner concluded that because of the functional limitations and pain associated with the CI’s condition, he could not perform his duties. The examiner rated the pain according to the American Medical Association (AMA) pain scale at slight and constant. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. The CI was given a permanent L3 profile for right ankle stress reactions with code C restrictions noted on the profile. The second c ommander’s s tatement indicated that the CI did not perform any hard labor duties and was in a holding detachment pending discharge. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam documented that the CI reported constant right foot pain , moderate at rest but with cold weather and activities, he woul d have a flare-up with swelling and weakness . He wore his ankle braces daily and would work at his job with pain. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

There were two range of motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Right Ankle ROM (Degrees) MEB 2.5 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P 11.5 Mos. Post-Sep
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) Full Range of Motion 18
Plantar Flexion (45) 1 6
Comment Pos. a ntalgic gait & tenderness to palpation ; N o pain on motion; No instability No swelling or tenderness; P os. painful motion ; No Deluca criteria
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10 % (VA 10%)
invalid font number 31502
The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the right foot injury condition as 5284 and rated it 10% for “moderate.” The VA rated the right ankle sprain s/p talus fracture with residual plantar fasciitis condition at 10%. The evidence in the STR documented that the CI had chronic moderate pain with functional impairment which interfered with his MOS activities. The Board considered the discrepancy between the ROM measurements documented in the NARSUM and the C&P exam. At the time the NARSUM was prepared, the CI’s right foot condition was less symptomatic as he had been less active; while at the time of the C&P exam the CI had been working part-time as a bus driver and represented post-separation worsening. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right foot injury condition.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left foot injury condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the right foot injury condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re - characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination .


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 140306 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record





                                                              
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review



SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150009943 (PD201401239)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01746

    Original file (PD2012 01746.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This evidence supports a determination of moderate disability.After due deliberation in consideration of all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that left tibial FX with residual weakness of the left ankle requiring an AFO and a cane for ambulation condition was separately unfitting and recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5262 IAW VASRD §4.71a. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01107

    Original file (PD2012 01107.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “left distal femoral stress fracture” and “stress fracture right talus” as unfitting, each rated 0%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). If he is on steep ground, the ankle will roll.” The VA physical exam (normal gait as above) recorded, “the right ankle is tender anteriorly to palpation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00718

    Original file (PD2010-00718.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was then medically separated with a 20% combined disability rating. ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Right Lower Extremity8799-872520%Healing Osteochondritis Dissecans s/p Arthroscopic Procedures with Reflux Sympathetic Dystrophy ligamentous injury, limitation of motion, muscle weakness and altered sensation of the right ankle, foot and lower leg, atrophy of the right calf, and residual tender scars5299-526250%*20090202Numbness/Nerve Pain In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02738

    Original file (PD-2013-02738.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) -ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Right Ankle Pain…50100%Residuals of Right Ankle Fracture with Talonavicular Joint Osteoarthritis, Right Foot527120%20061031Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 8 RATING: 0%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070127(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). On 1August 2005, a range-of-motion (ROM) evaluation was performed by physical therapy (PT).No pain was noted on motion, but ankle pain was reported...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00573

    Original file (PD2009-00573.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Bilateral Ankle and Foot Pain (including Scars) Conditions : The PEB found the CI unfit for: “Bilateral foot and ankle pain with history of bilateral surgically treated clubfeet, right calcaneonavicular coalition and resection of left calcaneonavicular coalition.” The PEB combined the Left ankle, Left foot, Right ankle, and Right foot as a single unfitting condition, coded as 5271 (VA Rating Code “5271 Ankle, limited motion of:”) and rated 10% (“Moderate”) with possible use of SECNAVINST or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00697

    Original file (PD2012-00697.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Code 5271 Rating 20% NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200697 SEPARATION DATE: 20031130 BOARD DATE: 20130111 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard SPC/E‐4 (31K10/Combat Signaler), medically separated for “chronic right ankle pain with loss of subtalar joint motion secondary to fracture of the talus (26 Jul 02),...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00905

    Original file (PD2011-00905.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic left foot and ankle pain condition and mechanical LBP condition as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Left Foot and Ankle Pain Condition . The PEB’s 0% rating was based on an assessment that the condition was characterized by “slight subjective symptoms only.” The VA’s 20% rating was assigned for “muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02791

    Original file (PD-2013-02791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separationand, to review those fitness determinations within its scope consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. tenderness to palpation; Decreased movement of toes of right foot; Repetitive motion increased ROM; No temperature change; No skin or vascular changes; Normal reflexes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00547

    Original file (PD2009-00547.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered this evaluation in determining the CI’s condition at the time of separation from service. While the VASRD code 5276 could be used analogously, it appears that the malunion of the metatarsal fractures with subsequent pain, arthritis, and painful motion of the right foot and ankle as well as the inability to perform or sustain prolonged or exertional activities are the conditions that limited the CI’s ability to perform the required duties of his rank and rating. The CI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02659

    Original file (PD-2013-02659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was placed on limited duty twice and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The rating for the unfitting ankle condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.