Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01937
Original file (PD-2013-01937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01937
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY  BOARD DATE: 20140617
SEPARATION DATE: 20060105


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve AD3/E-4 (Aviation Machinist’s Mate) medically separated for a right knee condition. The bilateral knees could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Old disruption of anterior cruciate ligament” (listed twice representing bilateral) was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “status post right anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, with right knee re-injury and possible loose bodies” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining condition , status post left anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction w as determined to be a C ategory III condition and not separately unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “All disabling medical conditions were not considered and/or properly awarded.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below. The left knee condition that was determined to be a Category III condition is also addressed. No additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050922
 VA - (11 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Status Post Right Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, with Right Knee Re-Injury and possible Loose Bodies 5299-5003 10% Instability, Right Knee, Status Post ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) Reconstruction 5257 10% 20070205
Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis, Right Knee with Limited Motion 5010-5260 10% 20070205
Status Post Left Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction CAT III Instability, Left Knee, Status Post ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) Reconstruction 5257 10% 20070205
Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis, Left Knee with Limited Motion 5010-5260 10% 20070205
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
Other x 8
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 80%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70809 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Status Post Right Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, with Right Knee Re-Injury and Possible Loose Bodies. The CI presented with right knee pain after a sporting injury in 2001. He underwent an ACL reconstruction in May 2002. The CI sustained a second injury to the right knee October 2004. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study revealed a possible loose fragment. An orthopedic consultation recommended a right knee arthroscopy, but the CI was relocating and deferred the surgery. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes that the CI continued to report right knee pain, swelling and hyperextension. The examiner noted that the CI was recovering from a recent re-injury of the right knee on 30 June 2005. The physical examination was significant for right knee hyperextension of 5 degrees, positive effusion, some medial joint line tenderness and a one millimeter anterior displacement (Lachman Test of the anterior cruciate ligament) with good end point.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 11 months after separation, the CI reported right knee giving way with popping behind the patella. He reported 5 flare ups in the past 12 months, each lasting approximately 2 weeks. The physical examination was significant for flexion limitation to 120 degrees with pain, pain to palpation over the mediolateral joint, moderate patellofemoral crepitus, positive patella grind pain with compression of the patella during motion and a 1+ anterior cruciate laxity. No effusion or hyperextension was present. Radiographic evaluation revealed changes consistent with an ACL reconstruction and early post-traumatic (surgical) osteoarthritis.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the status post right ACL reconstruction, with right knee re-injury and possible loose bodies as unfitting with a disability rating of 10% analogous to degenerative arthritis, coded 5299-5003. The VA applied dual coding for right knee instability and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (painful motion) with non-compensable limitation of motion. The Board considered the reconstruction of the right ACL, recurrent reports of right knee instability, recurrent right knee injuries and the objective finding of anterior laxity as evidence of right knee instability. The Board noted that the 1+ anterior laxity is the first level on a scale of one to three for evaluating ACL laxity and thus determined the criteria for slight knee instability was met for a disability rating of 10%. The Board then considered if there was evidence of limitation of range-of-motion for dual coding of the right knee. The Board determined that both the NARSUM and VA examinations evidenced limitation of flexion and joint line tenderness. The Board determined that the evidence reasonably supported pain limited motion for a disability rating of 10%; analogous to limitation of motion, coded 5299-5260. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right knee instability and 10% for the right knee limitation of motion for a combined 20% disability rating.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that left knee status post ACL reconstruction was not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The available treatment records document that the CI presented with left knee buckling and increasing pain on 10 September 2002. An MRI revealed a high grade ACL tear and a partial medial collateral ligament tear. The CI underwent a left ACL reconstruction in June 2003. Despite surgical and conservative management the CI continued to report left knee pain. At the time of the NARSUM examination, the CI did not report left knee pain. The physical evaluation documented a 1 mm Lachman with excellent end point, no joint effusion and no joint tenderness to palpation. The PEB adjudicated the left knee as not unfitting and not contributing to the right knee condition.

The VA C&P examination documented reports of knee giving away with popping behind the patella. The physical examination was significant for flexion limitation to 120 degrees with pain, pain to palpation over the mediolateral joint, mild patellofemoral crepitus, positive patella grind and a 1+ anterior cruciate laxity. No effusion or hyperextension was present. Radiographic evaluation revealed changes consistent with an ACL reconstruction and moderate post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

The Board makes note that the treatment records consistently documented pain in both knees, right greater than left. The Board noted radiographic pathology and surgical intervention. After due deliberation, the Board agreed that the preponderance of the evidence with regard to the functional impairment of the left knee favors its recommendation as an additionally unfitting condition. Board consensus was that the left knee condition at time of separation did not evidence compensable limitation of motion; however, there was satisfactory evidence of painful motion, VASRD § 4.59, and pain with use; VASRD §4.40. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), Board member agreed that the evidence supported a rating of 10% for the left knee.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the status post right ACL reconstruction, with right knee re-injury and possible loose bodies condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5260, IAW VASRD §4.59 and 10%, coded 5257 for right knee instability, IAW VASRD 4.71a, for a combined disability rating of 20%. In the matter of the contended left knee, status post ACL reconstruction condition, the Board majority agrees that it was unfitting and recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5260 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be re-characterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Knee Pain 5299-5260 10%
Right Knee Instability s/p ACL reconstruction 5257 10%
Left Knee Arthritis 5299-5260 10%
COMBINED 30%



The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131024, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
                  DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
        
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) PDBR ltr dtd 29 Mar 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (c) PDBR ltr dtd 25 Mar 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (d) PDBR ltr dtd 23 Mar 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (e) PDBR ltr dtd 29 Mar 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (f) PDBR ltr dtd 29 Mar 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (f).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC : Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a disability rating of 30% effective date of discharge.

b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN : Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a disability rating of 30% effective date of discharge.

c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN : Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a disability rating of 30% effective date of discharge.

d. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN : Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a disability rating of 30% effective date of discharge.

e. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC : Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a disability rating of 30% effective date of discharge.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions, including the recoupment of disability severance pay, if warranted, and notification to the subject members once those actions are completed.



          XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00583

    Original file (PD2009-00583.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB found in view of the “osteoarthritis degeneration of the left knee joint” as interfering with duty and forwarded “Bicompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Left Knee, Failed ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) Reconstruction in the Left Knee and Accompanying Anterolateral Rotatory Instability” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) on the NAVMED 6100/1. Based on the examination results, the examiner opined that the CI had Bicompartmental osteoarthritis of the left knee secondary to the ACL...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00229

    Original file (PD 2014 00229.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At an orthopedic evaluation 6 months after the surgery, the CI denied frank instability, but reported weakness “after walking and running a while.” Testing for instability revealed mild instability with a firm PCL endpoint. The examiner rendered a diagnosis of symptomatic right knee laxity.At a VA internal medicine evaluation dated 15 February 2006, 2 months prior to separation, the CI reported right knee pain with weakness. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00655

    Original file (PD2009-00655.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI’s left knee instability was documented multiple times in his service treatment record (STR) and NARSUM and continued after he separated from service. It is not possible to separate out pain symptoms due to patellofemoral pain syndrome and pain symptoms due to Cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic. The Board considered the condition of Anxiety Disorder--NOS and unanimously determined that this condition was not unfitting at the time of separation from service and therefore no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01029

    Original file (PD2011-01029.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the PEB adjudicated “bilateral knee” as the unfitting condition, the record of proceedings reflects separate codes and ratings for each knee, with application of the bilateral factor in computing the combined rating, which is consistent with VASRD standards. No other conditions were service-connected with a compensable rating by the VA within 12 months of separation or contended by the CI. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00737

    Original file (PD2011-00737.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (67U20/CH-47 Helicopter Repairman) medically separated for a right knee condition. Right Knee Condition . In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a dual coding disability rating for a combined rating of 30%, IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00865

    Original file (PD2010-00865.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded “Status /Post (S/P) Left Knee Reconstruction, Symptomatic, Existed Prior to Service (EPTS) to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) on NAVMED 6100/1. No other conditions were rated by the VA at 0% within 12 months of separation. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Ms. XXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either her...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02750

    Original file (PD-2013-02750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20070121 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02796

    Original file (PD-2013-02796.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The physical examination noted normal ROM of the left knee, presence of a scar, and a general comment of “Stable.”The final diagnosis was reported as,“Left knee tibial plateau fracture with ligament injury.”At the MEB NARSUM exam on 6 February 2007, the CI was still using crutches in accordance with the post-operative recovery plan for 8 to 12 weeks of limited weight bearing. Although the ACL and PCL were intact, there was evidence of residual laxity at the time of the PT examination and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00554

    Original file (PD2009-00554.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Right Knee Condition . The Board determined that the shoulder injury was not unfitting, and therefore not subject to service disability rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00064

    Original file (PD 2014 00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board will consider the Category II condition as stated above, in its review of the unfitting right knee condition. Right Knee Condition .