Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01930
Original file (PD-2013-01930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01930
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE    BOARD DATE: 20141009
SEPARATION DATE: 20051223


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSgt/E-5 (2T352A/Special Vehicle Maintenance Journeyman, Fire Trucks) medically separated for a right foot condition. The right foot condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a temporary L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The foot condition, characterized as “chronic right foot pain following bunion surgery,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The PEB adjudicated “right foot pain status post (s/p) hallux limitus and bunion surgery” as unfitting, rated at 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB also adjudicated “history of tachycardia” as a Category II condition and “history of anthrax vaccination reaction” as a Category III condition. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI writes: “I feel that there were more conditions than just my Right Metatarsal condition that should have been considered by the MEB. Please see the attached 22JAN2013 VA Rating Decision for what these are.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting foot condition is addressed below. Based on the CI’s contention, the tachycardia and anthrax reaction are also being considered; however, no additional conditions were within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20051108
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
R Foot Pain S/P Hallux Limitus and Bunion Surgery 5299-5280 10% S/P Right Foot Bunionectomy 5284 10% 20060228
Right Foot Surgical Scar, S/P Bunionectomy 7804 10% 20060228
History of Tachycardia Category II Supraventricular Tachycardia 7010 10% 20060228
Hx of Anthrax Vaccination Reaction Category III Anaphylactic Shock Due To Anthrax Vaccine 6699-6602 NSC
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 5 20060228
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 50%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60522 (most proximate to date of separation)




ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Foot Pain. The narrative summary (NARSUM) documented that the CI had foot surgery (base of great toe-first metatarsal surgery for hallux limitus with bunion of the right foot) in February 2002. After surgery, she had increased pain and paresthesias (numbness) in the foot when wearing steel-toed boots, which was requirement for her job. Physical therapy and four different types of boots with orthotics were not helpful. The NARSUM physical examination documented limited range-of-motion (ROM) of the hallux (first toe) with crepitus on ROM at the base of the great toe; first metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ). The examiner noted that “The first MTJ reveals a well-healed surgical scar 4 cm medial” and “the right first MPJ with mild edema.” There were no hammertoes or bunions. The screw heads (from the surgery) could not be palpated. The right hallux was 1 cm shorter than the next toe and there was some decreased sensation across the dorsum of the entire foot at the first three digits. Reflexes were intact/normal (2+) with good ROM at the ankle. There was no bilateral lower extremities edema noted.

At the VA Compensation and Pension examination dated 28 February 2006 (2 months after separation) the CI was noted to be walking with a slight antalgic gait without any assistance devices. She had moderate tenderness, with palpation, in the right first MPJ. She was not able to walk on her toes. There was pain with manipulation of the first, second and third MCJs. There was pain with motion of the first MPJ and dorsiflexion of 10 degrees and plantar flexion of 10 degrees with pain. There was no mention of any paresthesias. The examiner estimated that the CI lost 0 degrees regarding ROM of the right foot during repetitive use. VA exam documented a “well healed surgical scar of indeterminate length over the metatarsophalangeal joint which is moderately tender.”

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the chronic right foot pain at 10%, coded 5299-5280 ( h allux valgus, unilateral ) ; the 10% rating corresponds to “Operated with resection of metatarsal head” or “Severe, if equivalent to amputation of great toe .” The VA also rated the right foot pain at 10%, but used VASRD code 5284 (foot injuries, other), the 10% rating corresponds to “moderate” and additionally rated the bunionectomy scar at 10% coded 7804 (painful scar). In view of the scope of diagnoses and disability covered by VASRD code 5284, to cover all of the disability of the foot, the Board considered that the ideal coding would be under code 5284.

After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend an unfit determination and rating for the foot scar condition. Any disability from the scar (skin) condition was considered under the foot rating.

The Board majority adjudged that “moderate” best described the level of disability experienced by the CI. The Board considered the various coding options available, but none provided a higher disability rating than the 10% awarded by the PEB and there was no benefit to the CI for changing the acceptable PEB disability code. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic right foot condition.
Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge was to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that history of tachycardia and history of anthrax vaccination reaction were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is “a preponderance of evidence,” which is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard.

History of tachycardia: As noted in the NARSUM, the CI experience episodic palpations with rapid heart rate (tachycardia) since 2001. Cardiac evaluation was normal. In 2004, she declined medication for symptoms. An MEB for palpitations in 2005 returned the CI to duty and no further treatment was recommended. There were no applicable duty limitations for this condition noted in the NARSUM, and none were noted on the Physical Profile Serial Report (AF Form 422, dated 27 April 2005). This condition was not specifically noted in the commander’s statement. There was no performance-based evidence from the record that this condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the history of tachycardia, so no additional disability rating is recommended.

History of anthrax vaccination: The PEB designated history of anthrax vaccination reaction as a “condition that [is] not separately unfitting and not compensable or ratable.” Per DoD Instruction 1332.38, Enclosure 5, Medical Contraindication to the Administration of Required Immunizations is specifically characterized as a defect of a developmental nature and does not constitute a physical disability in the absence of an underlying ratable causative disorder. In this case, the CI had a single reaction to the immunization and suffered no persistent consequence, so there was no physical disability that would limit performance of duty or that could be rated under the Disability Evaluation System. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB assessment of this condition, so no additional disability rating is recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right foot condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board by a majority vote, recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. The single voter for dissent submitted the appended minority opinion. In the matter of the contended history of tachycardia and history of anthrax vaccination reaction, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.



The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131023, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record






                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


MINORITY OPINION.

The minority voter considered that the combination of the foot pain, antalgic gait, foot scar and inability to wear required military foot wear were all part of the CI’s disability. Given that the CI had onset of foot pain with walking only short distances, her disability picture more nearly approached the “moderately severe" (20%) level under code 5284. Coding under 5284 better reflects all of the CI’s foot, toe and ankle disabilities. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.40 (functional loss) the minority voter recommends a disability rating of 20% for the right foot condition.

The minority voter recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified In the matter of the right foot condition, the minority voter recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5284 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
R Foot Pain S/P Hallux Limitus and Bunion Surgery 5284 20%
COMBINED 20%
SAF/MRB


Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. §  1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01930.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,







XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency

Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01515

    Original file (PD-2013-01515.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An L3 profile was issued for bilateral hallux limitus (big toes limited motion and pain) on 13 November 2003 with restrictions of no running, jumping, prolonged standing, climbing or crawling on or under military equipment.The MEB NARSUM dated 12 December 2003 indicated the CI underwent additional surgery to remove the hardware and correction of her right foot from the surgery performed in September 2000. Her persistent hip pain was aggravated by the same activities as her back and limited...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00984

    Original file (PD2011-00984.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The right hallux valgus/limitus condition (bunion surgery and post-surgical result) was the principle cause of the right foot pain surgery and chronic right foot pain and was considered in rating the CI’s primary unfitting foot pain condition. The VA exam summary for pes planus is discussed above and all symptoms from the pes planus condition were considered in the rating of the foot pain condition. In the matter of the contended pes planus and hallux valgus conditions, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01026

    Original file (PD 2014 01026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “hallux limitus”as unfitting rating each great toe separately at 10% with a 20% combined rating, which included the bilateral factor. The remainder of the foot and ankle examination was normal.The MEB NARSUM concluded with diagnoses of hallux limitus (decreased motion of the toe) and metatarsal head metatarsalgia (pain at the base of the great toe). There was painful motion of the great toes, but the remainder of the foot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00295

    Original file (PD2012-00295.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The right great toe condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as two diagnoses (“joint pain, localized right 1st MTP [metatarsal-phalangeal] joint” and “hallux limitus of the right great toe”) characterized as separate medically unacceptable conditions IAW AR 40-501. SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00357

    Original file (PD-2014-00357.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Although not specified, it appeared that the PEB and VA combined both (surgical) feet as a single unfitting condition, coded as a peripheral nerve condition coded 8727 (neuralgia) and rated at 0%.The Board first agreed that there was sufficient evidence to support the unbundling of the feet based on the necessity for bilateral surgery and constant post-operative pain as well as abnormal sensation in each...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00562

    Original file (PD-2012-00562.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20020402 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200562 BOARD DATE: 20121220 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E‐4 (95B10/Military Police), medically separated for a right foot condition following injury to the sesamoid bone of the great toe (hallux). Any conditions or contention not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01640

    Original file (PD-2013-01640.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain, Left Ankle0%Left Ankle Strain5299-528420%20051110+20050610recordsBunion, Right Foot5280---%Hallux Valgus, Right Great Toe52800%20051110Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 12 RATING: 0%RATING: 60% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060501(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Chronic Pain, Left Ankle Condition . The records noted normal feet on the CI’s entry exam (see above) and right foot pain had onset...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02205

    Original file (PD-2014-02205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was profiled and permitted to take the Army physical fitness test, alternate aerobic portion.He was issued a permanent L3 profileand referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The skin condition (hypertrophic scar)was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also forwarded four other conditions (see rating comparison chart below), all judged to meet retention standards.The Informal PEB found the hypertrophic scar on the left foot unfitting and rated it...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00883

    Original file (PD2012-00883.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the moderate bunion deformity, left foot, operated as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD. The VA examination documented a normal gait and that the CI did not require the use of special shoes. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION Moderate Bunion Deformity, L Foot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00036

    Original file (PD2012-00036.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (44B/Welder), medically separated for bilateral bunion pain status post surgical correction of the left and of the right foot (joint at base of big toe). The PEB combined the right foot bunion pain condition and left foot bunion pain condition as a single unfitting condition, coded analogously to 5280 and rated 0%. I direct that all the Department of...