RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army
CASE NUMBER: PD1100984 SEPARATION DATE: 20070422
BOARD DATE: 20121004
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (13B/Cannon Crewmember), medically separated for chronic right foot pain. The CI stated symptoms began after a cannon round fell on his right foot in 2001. Despite two surgeries, aggressive physical therapy (PT), crutches, CAM walker, shoe orthotics; soft shoe and non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) the CI did not improve adequately to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded chronic right foot pain status post (s/p) surgery on DA Form 3947 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions appeared on the MEB’s submission. The PEB adjudicated the chronic right foot pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “I have received 70% rating SC for PTSD, 10% SC for bilateral pes planus, 10% for (left) medial malleolus, 10% severe hallux valgus. Individual Unemployability 100%.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The unfitting right foot pain condition includes the right foot portion of the contended severe hallux valgus and pes planus conditions. The remaining conditions rated by the VA and contended above (PTSD, left medial malleolus and any left foot conditions) are not within the Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB – Dated 20070103 | VA (2 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20070423 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Condition | Code | Rating | Condition | Code | Rating | Exam* |
Chronic Right Foot Pain | 5280 | 10% | Right Foot, S/P Surgical … | 5299-5280 | 10% | 20070207 |
Bilateral Pes Planus | 5276 | 0%* | 20070207 | |||
Right Foot, Scar | 7802 | 0% | 20070207 | |||
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ | Respiratory Disease, … | 6699-6604 | 10% | 20070207 | ||
Left Medial Malleolus, … | 5003 | 0%* | 20070207 | |||
Headaches, Unspecified … | 8199-8100 | 0% | 20070207 | |||
0% x 1/Not Service Connected x 3 | 20070207 |
*PTSD increased to 70% effective 20110428; Bilateral Pes Planus increased to 10% effective 20110217; Degenerative changes left ankle malleolus increased to 10% effective 20110614 (combined 80%); Entitlement to Individual Unemployability granted effective 20110520.
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board notes the current Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) ratings listed by the CI for all of his service-connected conditions, but must emphasize that its recommendations are premised on severity at the time of separation. The DVA ratings which it considers in that regard are those rendered most proximate to separation. The Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the DVA. The Board acknowledges that the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination was referenced, but not available in the evidence before it; and, could not be located after the appropriate inquiries. Further attempts at obtaining the relevant documentation would likely be futile and introduce additional delay in processing the case. The missing evidence will be referenced below in relevant context as extracted from the VA rating determinations (VARD); and, it is not suspected that the missing evidence would significantly alter the Board’s recommendations.
Chronic Right Foot Pain Condition. There were three evaluations including one goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluation in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.
Great Toe (R) ROM | Podiatry ~10 Mos. Pre-Sep | PT/MEB ~6 Mos. Pre-Sep | MEB ~6 Mos. Pre-Sep |
---|---|---|---|
Flexion 0⁰-50⁰1st mtp | “Full ROM” | 5⁰ | No ROM’s |
Extension0⁰-50⁰ 1st mtp | 10⁰ | ||
Comment: Hardware removal ~9 Mo. Pre-Sep |
Antalgic gait; full ROM with pain; tenderness to palpation (TTP) over dorsum to 1st metatarsal over screw heads | Mechanical limitation; Pt reports c/o pain; 3 trials of ROM | Antalgic gait; pain; open toe orthopedic soft shoe; numbness medial side great toe near scar; marked TTP over swollen area at base of 2nd/3rd toes extending 3cm onto dorsum of foot; pain with dorsiflexion/plantar flexion of 2nd/3rd toes; diffuse swelling over central part of right forefoot; tenderness at dorsal aspect 2nd metatarsal; tingling over scar on palpation |
§4.71a Rating | 10% | 10% | 10% |
There chronic right foot pain condition was well documented in the service treatment record (STR) starting in December 2004. In July 2005 the CI underwent right foot surgery (cheiliectomy with first metatarsal plantar flexor osteotomy). Post-operatively the CI continued with chronic pain and antalgic gait. In July 2006, the CI underwent right foot hardware removal surgery due to complaints of pain at the hardware site; however, sharp pain when walking still persisted. In October 2006, the CI was given a permanent L3 profile for right foot pain (hallux limitus) with restrictions of no running or marching and alternate shoes were allowed. The MEB examination 6 months prior to separation indicated constant pain in the right foot despite orthotics; antalgic gait; inability to walk normally altered gait to avoid flexing his forefoot, rotation of the foot outward; inability to run, ruck do push-ups or wear boots; the wearing of an open toe orthopedic soft shoe and the necessity of medication and “occasional foot massage by his wife because of morning pain and stiffness.” X-rays indicated pes planus and results of bunionectomy. The exam is summarized above and was accomplished 3 months following surgical removal of hardware.
The VA C&P exam is missing and numerous attempts to obtain this exam were unsuccessful. However, the VARD summarized the VA exam from 2 months prior to separation, stating: “VA examination of your feet and toes did not reveal any signs of painful motion, edema, disturbed circulation, weakness, atrophy of musculature, or tenderness. Arches were low. Palpation of the plantar surface did not reveal any tenderness, and the Achilles tendons showed good alignment. There was no evidence of claw feet or hammertoes. Flexion and dorsiflexion of the toes did not induce pain, and there was no evidence of Morton's metatarsalgia. The examiner noted that you do not require and do not use any type of corrective shoe wear. X-rays of your right foot revealed a pes planus deformity.”
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and the VA coded the chronic right foot condition as VASRD code 5280 Hallux valgus, unilateral, and rated 10%. All exams supported a 10% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right foot condition.
Contended PEB Conditions. The contended conditions related to the unfitting right foot pain condition were pes planus and severe hallux valgus (hallux limitus). The right hallux valgus/limitus condition (bunion surgery and post-surgical result) was the principle cause of the right foot pain surgery and chronic right foot pain and was considered in rating the CI’s primary unfitting foot pain condition. The right foot pes planus was noted in the PEB disability description. Moderate bilateral pes planus (asymptomatic) was documented on the CI’s entrance examination in 1997. The VA exam summary for pes planus is discussed above and all symptoms from the pes planus condition were considered in the rating of the foot pain condition. Of note, the VA additionally rated the right foot scar at 0%, with pre-separation exam summary indicating a flat, well healed scar with no alteration in sensory perception or vascular supply. Any left foot condition is outside the scope of the Board as noted above. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that all of the right foot symptoms and diagnoses were appropriately considered and coded under the PEB unfitting right foot pain condition; and, therefore, no additional disability ratings can be recommended.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic right foot pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended pes planus and hallux valgus conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no additional disability rating as all symptoms were contained in the PEB rating of the CI’s unfitting chronic right foot pain condition. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
UNFITTING CONDITION | VASRD CODE | RATING |
---|---|---|
Chronic Right Foot Pain | 5280 | 10% |
COMBINED | 10% |
______________________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20111102, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120019087 (PD201100984)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01515
An L3 profile was issued for bilateral hallux limitus (big toes limited motion and pain) on 13 November 2003 with restrictions of no running, jumping, prolonged standing, climbing or crawling on or under military equipment.The MEB NARSUM dated 12 December 2003 indicated the CI underwent additional surgery to remove the hardware and correction of her right foot from the surgery performed in September 2000. Her persistent hip pain was aggravated by the same activities as her back and limited...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00119
SEPARATION DATE: 20070304 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Foot Pain5299-528010%S/P Surgery Hallux Valgus Right Foot52800%20070510S/p Surgical Scar Hallux Valgus Right...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00868
SEPARATION DATE: 20061020 The bilateral foot conditions, characterized by the MEB as “hallux valgus” and “bilateral pes planus,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. There were no other MH treatment notes for review.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01026
No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “hallux limitus”as unfitting rating each great toe separately at 10% with a 20% combined rating, which included the bilateral factor. The remainder of the foot and ankle examination was normal.The MEB NARSUM concluded with diagnoses of hallux limitus (decreased motion of the toe) and metatarsal head metatarsalgia (pain at the base of the great toe). There was painful motion of the great toes, but the remainder of the foot...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01640
Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain, Left Ankle0%Left Ankle Strain5299-528420%20051110+20050610recordsBunion, Right Foot5280---%Hallux Valgus, Right Great Toe52800%20051110Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 12 RATING: 0%RATING: 60% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060501(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Chronic Pain, Left Ankle Condition . The records noted normal feet on the CI’s entry exam (see above) and right foot pain had onset...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00620
The PEB adjudicated the bilateral foot pain and bilateral hallux valgusconditionsas a single unfitting condition, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The VA rated the bilateral foot condition separately as hallux valgus, coded5280, at 10% for each foot for a combined rating of 20%. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01755
Ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases.The rated, unfitting condition of bilateral foot painas well as Raynaud’sphenomenon, low back pain (LBP), left knee retropatellar pain syndrome (RPPS), hemorrhoids, cervical dysplasia, pelvic pain, and bilateral wrist pain conditions as requested for consideration meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview.Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00755
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Right Foot Condition. Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02342
At that point I was sent to the medical review board to see what my options were. The VA rated the right ankle and foot at 10% coded 5284 (Foot injuries, other; “moderate symptoms”) with two additional 0% ratings for 5276 (Flatfoot, acquired [pes planus] “Mild”) and 5280 (hallux valgus).The Board considered that the disability conditions of the foot had overlapping symptoms and considered a possible higher rating-level under 5284 (considering all foot/ankle conditions) or 5310 (muscle...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00776
In the matter of the bilateral cataracts, trigeminal neuralgia, bilateral knee pain, pes planus, tinnitus or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration; the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR)...