BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS
SEPARATION DATE: 20031021
NAME: XX
CASE NUMBER: PD1200883
BOARD DATE: 20130207
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCPL/E-3 (3043/AFSC, JOB), medically separated for
moderate bunion deformity, left foot, status post (s/p) surgery, and moderate bunion
deformity, right foot, patient refused surgery. The CI was diagnosed with a diagnosis of
bilateral bunions, (left operated) on March 3, 2003. The CI refused surgery on the right foot
after experiencing significant pain after surgery on the left bunion. He did not improve
adequately after treatment to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational
Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty (LIMDU)
and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions
for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the moderate bunion
deformity, left foot, operated as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs
Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD. The “moderate bunion deformity, right foot, patient
refused surgery” condition was determined to be willful neglect IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E and
not ratable. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “Other medical conditions which were physical and mental that are in medical
record.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Only the bunion conditions are within the
Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise
outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the
Board for Correction of Naval Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB – Dated 20030429
VA (16 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20031022
Condition
Mod. Bunion Deformity,
Left Foot,
Mod. Bunion Deformity,
Right Foot,
Code
5280
Rating
10%
Condition
Mod. Bunion Deformity, L Foot
Scar, Residual … Left Foot
IM/WN Mod. Bunion Deformity, R Foot
Code
5280
7804
5280
Rating
10%
10%
0%
Exam
20040920
20040920
20040920
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 10%
Not Service-Connected x 2
Combined: 20%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Moderate Bunion Deformity, Left Foot Operated Condition. The first documented visit for
bunions was on 7 February 2002, 14 months after accession, when he noted a 2 year history of
bilateral foot pain. A family member had recently had a bunionectomy and he desired the
same. He was next seen on 7 August 2002 when he noted a history of bunions since high
school which had gradually worsened over time. On 23 October 2002, a left bunionectomy was
performed. A second procedure on the right was anticipated after the CI had recovered from
the first surgery. Recovery was complicated by significant post-operative pain for which he
underwent hardware removal without significant relief. A local steroid injection relieved the
pain temporarily. The narrative summary (NARSUM) dictated on 3 March 2003, 7 months prior
to separation, and noted that the CI had declined surgery on the right toe due to the post-
operative pain on the left. The examiner noted that there was no discernable swelling or
increased warmth of the left great toe and that the motion was satisfactory. He was noted to
have had no improvement in his pain “despite the fact that there are not objective reasons for
the pain.” At the MEB examination on 25 March 2003, the CI reported that he had residual
pain and reduced movement of the left great toe after surgery. The only comment on the right
was to note the presence of a bunion. The MEB physical exam documented no specific
findings. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 20 September 2004, 11
months after separation, the CI reported that his symptoms began in boot camp and were
aggravated by the use of boots. He stated that he could walk ½ to a mile before developing
pain in his feet. He did not require the use of special shoes. On examination, his gait was
normal. There was tenderness over the distal left great toe and the scar; the latter was
otherwise well healed. The range-of-motion (ROM) was noted to be normal.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB and VA both rated the left bunionectomy condition at 10% and coded it as 5280, hallux
valgus (bunion). The Board determined that this is the appropriate code and that no higher
rating is available under this code. The VA also rated the scar. There was no impairment
attributed to the scar in the service treatment records (STRs). The use of shoe of comfort was
only in the post-operative period. The VA examination documented a normal gait and that the
CI did not require the use of special shoes. By precedent, the Board does not recommend
separation rating for scars unless their presence imposes a direct limitation on fitness. No such
permanent limitation was in evidence. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence
and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient
cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left bunionectomy condition.
Moderate Bunion Deformity, Right Foot Surgery Refused by the Patient Condition. As noted
above, the CI endorsed a history of bilateral bunions since high school and that other family
members also had bunions. The CI reported a history of pain which preceded accession at the
initial visit in 2002. The CI declined surgery. His decision was thought to be unreasonable and
he signed a Form 6100/4, Certificate of Counseling, indicating such. The Board found no
evidence that there had been more than natural progression of the condition while in service
and that the CI had declined reasonable treatment. Accordingly, the record does not support a
finding that the right bunion was separately unfitting. After due deliberation in consideration
of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to
recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the right bunion condition. The
Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional
disability rating.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised in rating the left bunion. As discussed above, PEB reliance on SECNAVINST
1850.4E was operant in this case in the fitness determination of the right bunion. In the matter
2 PD1200883
of the left and right bunion conditions and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously
recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the
Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
UNFITTING CONDITION
Moderate Bunion Deformity, L Foot Operated
Moderate Bunion Deformity, R Foot, Surgery Refused by the
Patient
VASRD CODE RATING
5280
N/A
10%
IM/WN
COMBINED
10%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120620, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
xx
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
3 PD1200883
MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS
Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 22 Mar 13
In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for
the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the
PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either
characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of
the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- former USMC
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USMC
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USMC
xx
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)
4 PD1200883
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00036
SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (44B/Welder), medically separated for bilateral bunion pain status post surgical correction of the left and of the right foot (joint at base of big toe). The PEB combined the right foot bunion pain condition and left foot bunion pain condition as a single unfitting condition, coded analogously to 5280 and rated 0%. I direct that all the Department of...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00357
The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Although not specified, it appeared that the PEB and VA combined both (surgical) feet as a single unfitting condition, coded as a peripheral nerve condition coded 8727 (neuralgia) and rated at 0%.The Board first agreed that there was sufficient evidence to support the unbundling of the feet based on the necessity for bilateral surgery and constant post-operative pain as well as abnormal sensation in each...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00119
SEPARATION DATE: 20070304 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Foot Pain5299-528010%S/P Surgery Hallux Valgus Right Foot52800%20070510S/p Surgical Scar Hallux Valgus Right...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00128
The VA, in its rating decision of 7 October 2003, utilized code 5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine, as per the current VASRD rating guidelines in effect at that time.The VA rating decision dated 29 July 2003, 2 months proximate to the date of separation, rated the CI’s condition at 0%, based upon an examination that revealed neither painful nor limited motion. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00984
The right hallux valgus/limitus condition (bunion surgery and post-surgical result) was the principle cause of the right foot pain surgery and chronic right foot pain and was considered in rating the CI’s primary unfitting foot pain condition. The VA exam summary for pes planus is discussed above and all symptoms from the pes planus condition were considered in the rating of the foot pain condition. In the matter of the contended pes planus and hallux valgus conditions, the Board...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01515
An L3 profile was issued for bilateral hallux limitus (big toes limited motion and pain) on 13 November 2003 with restrictions of no running, jumping, prolonged standing, climbing or crawling on or under military equipment.The MEB NARSUM dated 12 December 2003 indicated the CI underwent additional surgery to remove the hardware and correction of her right foot from the surgery performed in September 2000. Her persistent hip pain was aggravated by the same activities as her back and limited...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00503
Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating will be recommended IAW the VASRD and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation. The range-of-motion (ROM) of the feet was noted to be good. X-rays were normal other than bilateral mild hammer toes of the second and third digits; this is a separate condition from the bilateral hallux valgus. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01817
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201817 BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20130315 SEPARATION DATE: 20050114 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (92A/Automated Logistical Specialist), medically separated for a left foot condition. The left foot condition, characterized as status post left foot bunionectomy with chronic pain,...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00776
In the matter of the bilateral cataracts, trigeminal neuralgia, bilateral knee pain, pes planus, tinnitus or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration; the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR)...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00868
SEPARATION DATE: 20061020 The bilateral foot conditions, characterized by the MEB as “hallux valgus” and “bilateral pes planus,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. There were no other MH treatment notes for review.