Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01888
Original file (PD-2013-01888.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2013-01888
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140528
SEPARATION DATE: 20050716


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard SGT/E-5 ( 95B2O / Military Police ) medically separated for bilateral hearing loss condition. He was diagnosed with permanent hearing loss , which could not be amplified with hearing aids to meet the physical requirements of his M ilitary Occupational Specialty . He was issued a permanent H 3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Bilateral severe high frequency sensorineural hearing loss was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as not meeting medical standards IAW AR 40-501 . No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The I nformal PEB adjudicated bilateral severe high frequency sensorineural hearing loss as unfitting, rated 0 % , with application of VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI attached a written statement (not medically qualified for corrections officer position in 2012 due to profound & worsening hearing loss) and VA entitlement letters to his application which were reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the bilateral hearing loss condition is addressed below. Any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050606
 VA* - (14.9 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral High Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss … 6100 0% Bilateral Hearing Loss 6100 0% 20061005
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Tinnitus 6260 10% 20061005
Other x 11 20061005
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 10%**
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 200 70117 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS))
** Rating increased to 30% effective 20080306 from VARD 20081023 and C&P Audio 20081008 .



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral High Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss. The record documented bilateral high frequency hearing loss that had progressed from mild/moderate through 2004 when the hearing loss was noted to progress to moderate in the right and severe all frequency hearing loss on the left side. The CI underwent detailed audiology evaluation in January 2005 and complained of ringing in both ears (tinnitus). The pure tone hearing loss and Speech Recognition In Noise Test (SPRINT; Category D) were evaluated (see chart below) as meeting the H3 profile limitations and required avoidance of hazardous noise to avoid progression. The narrative summary (NARSUM) and consults indicated the rearing loss was permanent and was not favorable for hearing aids. The NARSUM stated “It was thought that his hearing loss was severe enough to be a safety issue for him and other soldiers if retained in the military…his limited ability to hear could be harmful for him and others in a deployed environment…” The diagnosis was bilateral severe high frequency sensorineural hearing loss and the CI was considered to be “very highly functioning, however reads lips to ensure proper communication.”

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) audio exam dated 5 October 2006, approximately 14 months after separation, the CI reported bilateral tinnitus and pure tone audiometry and speech recognition testing (using Maryland CNC testing) is summarized below. The remainder of the ear exam was normal. The diagnosis was bilateral sensorineural hearing. In response to a request for medical opinion relating hearing loss to tinnitus, the audiologist stated: “Hearing loss noted on physicals while on active duty and tinnitus is consistent with hearing loss.”

The Board noted that the VA C&P from 8 October 2008, over 3 years after separation documented significantly worse pure tone audiometry and worse speech recognition values. The VA rated that exam at 30%.

Audiometric Threshold (Hz) → 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 6000 Comments § 4.85-4.86 Rating
Audio 5.9 mos. Pre-Sep (20050120 ) 0%
Right 20 25 35 55 55 65 P Tone Av R=43, L=53;
SPRINT: R96 & L92
Left 30 35 45 65 65 70
VA C&P ~14.9 mos. Post-Sep (20061005 ) 0%
Right 25 30 55 55 60 -- P Tone Avg R=50, L=56;
CNC: R86 & L80
Left 25 35 50 70 70 --

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Although the service speech discrimination testing (SPRINT) was not IAW VASRD Per §4.85(a) [requires CNC test which uses a different word set], the 2006 VA exam, used the CNC testing and both hearing evaluations were independently rated at 0% using VASRD rating criteria. The later VA exam from 2008 was adjudged post-separation worsening and not indicative of the CI’s disability picture at the time of separation. The Board; however, considered that the CI’s disqualifying condition of hearing loss was not limited to pure tone testing or specific speech recognition testing alone, but that tinnitus reasonable played a part in the CI’s difficulty in safely understanding communication. The Board therefore recommends analogous coding of the CI’s complete hearing disability as 6100-6260 at 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the bilateral severe high frequency sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the bilateral severe high frequency sensorineural hearing loss condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 6100-6260 IAW VASRD §4.85. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Bilateral Severe High Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Tinnitus 6100-6260 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130916, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150001229 (PD201301888)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01602

    Original file (PD2012 01602.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Hearing Loss (bilateral) . The VASRD rates speech discrimination measured by the Maryland CNC which is not directly comparable with the more contemporary SPRINT speech discrimination...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01881

    Original file (PD-2013-01881.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20051030 The MEB found the hearing loss condition medically unacceptable and forwarded it to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board determined that a disability rating of 0% is warranted for the SNHL condition, it is appropriately coded 6100, and IAW VASRD §4.85 and §4.86 meets criteria for the 0% rating level.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00616

    Original file (PD2011-00616.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was then medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Tinnitus Condition . In the matter of the bilateral sensorineural hearing Loss with tinnitus condition and IAW VASRD §4.85 and §4.86, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication at separation.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00688

    Original file (PD2009-00688.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although had hearing loss stabilized, repeated exposure to noisy military environments was believed to further aggravate his condition and he therefore underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Sensorineural Hearing Loss. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review XXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00833

    Original file (PD2012-00833.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20021130 NAME: XX CASE NUMBER: PD1200833 BOARD DATE: 20130117 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (0311/Rifleman), medically separated for profound bilateral hearing loss in the high frequency ranges. The PEB adjudicated the bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) condition as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00711

    Original file (PD2011-00711.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the matter of the tinnitus condition, the Board unanimously recommends that it be added as an additionally unfitting condition for separation rating, coded 6260 and rated 10% IAW VASRD §4.87. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating XXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01513

    Original file (PD-2014-01513.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Hearing Loss61000%Bilateral Hearing Loss61000%20080812Other x 0 (In Scope)Other x 6 Rating: 0%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00556

    Original file (PD2011-00556.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Six other conditions, as identified in the rating chart below, were forwarded on the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) submission as medically acceptable conditions. The PEB adjudicated the bilateral SNHL as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The service ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01200

    Original file (PD-2014-01200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Hearing Loss61000%Bilateral Hearing Loss61000%20040705Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING: 0%RATING: 0% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20100522(most proximate to date of separation (DOS). Both the PEB and VA coded the hearing loss condition under 6100 with ratings of 0% citing no compensable hearing loss. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00482

    Original file (PD2011-00482.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IPEB adjudicated the cervical spine and hearing loss condition as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively; with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Other IPEB Conditions . The Board, therefore, has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating.