RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY
SEPARATION DATE: 20040204
NAME: XX
CASE NUMBER: PD1200648
BOARD DATE: 20130117
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty Petty Officer Third Class/E-4 (MT3/Missile Technician
Third Class), medically separated for L3/4 and L4/5 disc herniation status post (s/p)
laminectomy. The CI complained of persistent back pain after having a multiple level lumbar
laminectomy performed in January 2002. That surgery was performed for multiple disc
herniations incurred after injury sustained while on active duty. His pain did improve after
surgery. He had permanent restrictions since his surgery to include no running. Because of
persistent pain in the low back and pain (LBP) in both the right and left buttocks and
hamstrings, the CI was unable to meet the physical requirements of his rating or to satisfy
physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation
Board (MEB). L3/4 and L4/5 disc herniation s/p laminectomy, recurrent disc herniation on
L5/S1, degenerative disc disease (DDD) L3 /4, L4/5 and LBP conditions, identified in the rating
chart below, were also identified and forwarded by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated the L3/4 and
L4/5 disc herniation s/p laminectomy conditions as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the
SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The remaining conditions (degenerative disc disease L3/4, L4/5, low back
pain, and recurrent disc herniation L5/S1) were determined to be not unfitting and determined
to be Category II. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 20% disability
rating.
CI CONTENTION: “The disability rating of 10% did not accurately reflect the level of trauma to
my lower back. The lack of mobility and daily pain warranted a higher rating.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The Category II PEB conditions of DDD
L3/4, L4/5; and LBP; recurrent disc herniation L5/S1; as well as the CI-specified lack of mobility
and daily pain conditions as requested for consideration meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI
6040.44 for Board purview; and are addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for
the unfitting L3/4 and L4/5 disc herniation s/p laminectomy condition. Any conditions or
contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of
review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB – Dated 20030916
Condition
L3/4 And L4/5 Disc Herniation Status
Post Laminectomy (Low Back Pain)
Degenerative Disc Disease L3/4, L4/5
Low Back Pain
Recurrent Disc Herniation L5/S1
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 20%
Rating
20%
Code
5295
CAT II
CAT II
CAT II
VA (~1 Mo. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20040205
Condition
Rating
Exam
Code
Status Post Discectomy and
Laminectomy, L3-L4 and L4-
L5
5243
10%*
20040330
0% X 1
Combined: 10%*
20040330
*Increased to 40% from 20080414 (combined 40%)
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed in the CI’s application
regarding the gravity of his condition and the significant impairment with which his service-
connected condition continues to burden him. The Board wishes to clarify that it is subject to
the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability Evaluation System
(DES) operates. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for
anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical
separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veteran’s
Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code). The Board
evaluates DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its
authority resides in evaluating the fairness of fitness decisions and rating determinations for
disability at the time of separation.
L3/4 and L4/5 Disc Herniation Status Post Laminectomy (Low Back Pain) Condition [Including
Associated Lower Back Conditions]. The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in
evidence which the Board weighed
its rating recommendation, with
documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.
in arriving at
Thoracolumbar ROM
Flexion (90⁰ Normal)
Ext (0-30)
R Lat Flex (0-30)
L Lat Flex 0-30)
R Rotation (0-30)
L Rotation (0-30)
Combined (240⁰)
Comment
§4.71a Rating
PT ~12 Mos. Pre-Sep
“AROM WNL”
“hamstring
flexibility
lacking 35 bilat”; non-
antalgic gait, [Tenderness;
painful motion,
not
commented]
0%-unk
flex/ext
MEB ~5 Mos. Pre-Sep
“50% expected
without discomfort”-
-
75-80% of expected due
to discomfort
-
in back, rad’g to
Pain
“50%
buttocks,
expected flex/ext without
discomfort”
75-80%
expected lat rotn due to
discomfort; normal gait
20%
HS.
VA C&P ~3 Mos. Post-Sep
80⁰
30⁰
-
-
30⁰
30⁰
-
“Mild
motion”;
+ spasm; X-ray: reversal of
the
the
lumbar spine
20%
curvature of
limitation
of
At the MEB examination, dictated 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported pain in his back
radiating to his buttocks and hamstrings, without weakness. The MEB physical exam noted
decrease in ROM to “50% expected flexion extension at the lumbosacral spine without
significant discomfort.” Lateral rotation was noted to be “75 to 80% of expected” limited to
discomfort. The examiner noted normal gait and did not comment on the presence of spasm.
X-ray showed multi-level facet changes. Magnetic resonance imaging on 9 August 2003 showed
advanced degenerative changes, new bulging at L5/S1 and severe disc ‘dessication’ at L3/4
andL4/5 levels.
2 PD1200648
At the VA Compensation and Pension exam, 3 months after separation, the CI reported stiffness
and pain localized to his low back, aggravated by sitting and standing for long periods. He had
no neurologic symptoms to include weakness. Physical evaluation revealed spasm to his low
back, forward flexion to 80 degrees, extension to 30, lateral extension to 30 bilaterally and
rotation to 30 bilaterally. There was radiographic evidence of reversal of the curvature of the
lumbar spine.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB, under the interim spine rules (prior to September 2003), rated the low back condition 20%
code 5295, lumbosacral strain. The VA, under the new spine rules, rated the low back condition
10% under code 5243, intervertebral disc syndrome, based upon ROM measurements at that
time. At the date of separation, codes 5237, 5243, and 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the
spine) are appropriate to the CI’s pathology. The ROM described in the narrative summary
correlates to a 20% rating under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the
Spine (Forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than
60 degrees). A 40% rating requires thoracolumbar spine 30 degrees or less or ankylosis of the
entire thoracolumbar spine. There is no evidence of incapacitating episodes to support a rating
under the 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome) formula for rating intervertebral disc syndrome
based on incapacitating episodes. There was no evidence of unfitting peripheral nerve
impairment in this case. The general spine formula ratings are with or without symptoms such
as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching in the area of the spine affected by
residuals of injury or disease. The CI’s contended lack of mobility and daily pain, as well as the
Category II diagnoses of DDD L3/4, L4/5; LBP; and recurrent disc herniation L5/S1 are
considered under the single rating in accordance with the general spine formula ratings. After
due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Resolution of
reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a
change in the PEB 20% adjudication for the LBP condition, but recommended a change in code
to 5243 to align with the VASRD in effect at the date of separation.
Contended PEB Conditions. All of the Category II and contended conditions were subsumed in
the modification of the CI’s rating for his unfitting lower back condition above.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised; however, the PEB rating was under an older VASRD no longer in effect at the
time of separation. In the matter of the L3/4 and L4/5 disc herniation s/p laminectomy (LBP)
condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB’s 20% disability rating
level, but a change to VASRD code 5243 IAW VASRD §4.71a to conform to the VASRD in effect
at the date of separation. This change is because an administrative correction (VASRD Code
changed to 5243) noted. In the matter of the contended DDD L3/4, L4/5; LBP (and lack of
mobility); and recurrent disc herniation L5/S1; conditions, the Board unanimously recommends
no change from the PEB determinations as Category II and not separately unfitting or
compensable. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for
consideration.
3 PD1200648
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
L3/4 and L4/5 Disc Herniation Status Post Laminectomy (Low
Back Pain) Condition
VASRD CODE
5243
COMBINED
RATING
20%
20%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120606, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
xxx
Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
4 PD1200648
MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS
Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 21 Feb 13
In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for
the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR
that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization
of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s
Physical Evaluation Board:
- former USN
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USN
- former USN
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USMC
- former USMC
- former USMC
xxxx
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)
5 PD1200648
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01587
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201587 BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20130411 SEPARATION DATE: 20020903 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4(74B/COMPUTER SPECIALIST) medically separated for a lumbar spine condition due to lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). ...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00279
The CI mentioned left leg pain and left foot numbness in his contention. This review was performed 23 March 2009. All evidence considered there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting addition of the neurologic symptoms in left lower extremity, associated with the low back condition as an unfitting condition for separation rating.
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00004
The PEBs rated the CI’s back condition 10% based on the NARSUM and service records in evidence at the time (flexion to 80°, normal strength, normal gait), while the VA’s 20% rating at the time of separation was additionally based on the January 2006 neurosurgery note documenting an antalgic gait (20% for muscle spasm, severe enough to alter gait). The Board considered whether the CI’s radiculopathy was separately unfitting, warranting a disability rating at the time of separation. ...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00761
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200761 SEPARATION DATE: 20020116 BOARD DATE: 20121218 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard Soldier, SGT/E‐5 (45E, assigned to a Hull Systems Mechanic slot, 63E), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) accompanied by neck pain with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01435
No physical examination findings were documented. Although the DA 199 mentioned characteristic pain on motion, which supports a 10% disability rating using either the 2003 or the current VASRD, the PEB assigned a 0% rating.The VA determined that neither the back pain nor the left leg radiculopathy was service-connected or service aggravated. Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00062
Treatment records document relief of headaches with medication. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CIs disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Intervertebral Disc Syndrome 5243 10% COMBINED 10% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120118, w/atchs Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00823
However both the NARSUM and the treatment record document the radicular pain and weakness continued at the same level of severity after the second surgery and at least until the time of the MEB NARSUM in April 2006. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record VASRD CODE RATING 20% 10% 30% 5243 8620 COMBINED XXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review 6 PD1100823 SFMR‐RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01273
Straight leg raises were negative for radicular symptoms and muscle strength and reflexes were normal.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM)on24June 2004, noted the back pain was aggravated by bending, twisting, stooping, running and interfered with carrying heavy loads while marching.During examination thoracolumbar flexion ranged from 57 degrees anddecreased to 63 degrees, by the third repetition (57, 60, and 63). The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00364
The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Service Treatment Record I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01312
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20080818 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1201312 BOARD DATE: 20130214 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (42A10/Human Resources Specialist), medically separated for degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine with back pain status post (s/p) L5-S1 decompression L2-L5,...