RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
SEPARATION DATE: 20021218
NAME: XXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1101139
BOARD DATE: 20121002
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (Military Occupational Specialty [MOS] Not
Obtained/Student in AIT), medically separated for chronic abdominal pain following total
vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapsed. The CI had symptomatic uterine prolapsed halfway
through AIT and underwent a vaginal hysterectomy. Although she returned to training, she was
unable to train due to residual pelvic pain. She did not respond adequately to treatment and
was unable to perform within the military, or meet physical fitness standards. She was issued a
permanent P3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Chronic abdominal
pain following total vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapsed was forwarded to the Physical
Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions
appeared on the MEB’s submission. The PEB adjudicated the chronic abdominal pain condition
as unfitting rated 0% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain
policy. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% combined disability
rating.
CI CONTENTION: “Lost of reproductive organs and tacked bladder.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in the
Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to
those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued
military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not
determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in
all cases. The “lost of reproductive organs and tacked bladder” as requested for consideration
meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview as they are elements of the
total vaginal hysterectomy which is part of the unfitting “chronic abdominal pain following total
vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse” condition. Any conditions or contention not
requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain
eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
*Original VA rating based on service treatment records (STR) and continued after VA exam
Combined: 0%
Service IPEB – Dated 20021209
Condition
Code
Rating
Chronic Abdominal Pain s/p
TVH for Uterine Prolapse
5099-5003
0%
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
VA (STR & ~1 Mo. Post-Separation) – All Effective 20021219
Exam
STR
Condition
Rating
Code
7617
50%*
Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with
Continued Abdominal Pain to
Include Claim for Tacked Bladder
Major Depressive Disorder
9434
30%
20040202
20040202
20040202
Not Service Connected x 0
Combined: 70%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed in the CI’s application
regarding the gravity of her condition and the significant impairment with which her service-
connected condition continues to burden her. The Board further notes with respect to her
contended loss of reproductive organs and tacked bladder, that the presence of a diagnosis, in
and of itself, is not sufficient to render a condition unfitting and ratable. While the Disability
Evaluation System (DES) considers all of the member's medical conditions, compensation can
only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a member's career, and then only to
the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. It is a fact, however, that the DES
has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity
or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. The Board utilizes the
Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its
recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to
post-separation evidence. The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides
in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the
time of separation. Post-separation evidence therefore is probative only to the extent that it
reasonably reflects the disability and fitness implications at the time of separation. However,
the DVA, operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to
consider all service-connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate Veteran’s for the
purpose of adjusting the disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time.
Chronic Abdominal Pain Following Total Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse. Service
treatment records (STRs) indicated that lower abdominal pain persisted after her total vaginal
hysterectomy 4 months prior to separation. The total vaginal hysterectomy included removal
of the reproductive organs and tacking of the bladder. Following convalescent leave, the CI had
continued lower abdominal pain with “increased pain with running, prolonged standing, sit-ups
and marching.” The CI was unable to perform physical demands of training due to pain and
apprehension. The narrative summary (NARSUM), dictated 2 months prior to separation
indicated an assessment of pelvic pain status post total vaginal hysterectomy secondary to
uterine prolapse. The CI was taking medication of Motrin and occasional narcotic pain
medication (Percocet) in the evening. Exams showed a soft and non-tender abdomen with
vaginal exam indicating a well healed cuff with no adnexal masses. The MEB’s DD Form 2808
indicated lower abdominal tenderness with deep palpation.
At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam 14 months after separation, the CI reported
frequent left lower abdomen/pelvic region pain along with intermittent urinary incontinence
and urinary hesitancy (with use of pads). There was “pain associated with lifting, picking up and
carrying the children. She has frequent bathroom visits due to her urinary problem.” The CI
was using non-narcotic pain medication (Tylenol-PM). The C&P examination revealed mild
tenderness in the left lower abdomen, and a vaginal exam with no abnormalities. PAP smear
from 2004 was reported as normal.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB disability description was “chronic abdominal pain following total vaginal hysterectomy for
uterine prolapse, physical profile excludes the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) and common
soldier tasks. Rated for pain, moderate/intermittent.” Her medical condition was rated at 0%
analogously to 5003 (Arthritis, degenerative) which was IAW the USAPDA pain policy. The VA,
used the STR when rating the CI for “total vaginal hysterectomy with continued abdominal pain
to include claim for tacked bladder” at 50% coded 7617 (uterus and both ovaries, removal of,
complete). It was clear from the record that the disqualifying condition was abdominal pain
and not due to loss of reproductive organs or any symptoms related to the urinary system.
Although the VA rates for 7617, the military only rates the unfitting condition. Absence of
reproductive organs was not unfitting. There was no significant urinary system symptoms
proximate to separation and “tacking of the bladder did not rise to the level of being unfitting.
The CI’s abdominal pain, absent a distinct diagnosis must be coded analogously IAW VASRD
2 PD1101139
§4.20 (Analogous ratings) to a closely related disease or injury in which not only the functions
affected, but the anatomical localization and symptomatology are closely analogous. Records
did not indicate that following recovery from surgery there was any prolonged infection; heavy
vaginal bleeding; abdominal bloating or bowel obstruction symptoms; substantial pelvic pain;
or muscle injury diagnoses.
The Board concluded therefore that absence of reproductive organs and the tacked bladder
conditions could not be recommended for additional disability rating. Since this unfitting
abdominal pain condition followed abdominal surgery, the Board considered alternate coding
analogously to 7629 (Endometriosis) or 7301 (Peritoneum, adhesions of) although neither was a
laproscopically proven diagnosis. The CI’s predominate unfitting symptoms were abdominal
pain on attempting work and aggravated by movement, which best aligned with the 7301
criteria. The Board considered if the CI’s rating level was closer to the Mild (0%) or moderate
(10%) criteria as the 30% and higher criteria were not approached. The Board adjudged that
the CI’s disability picture proximate to separation was closer to the moderate (10%) criteria
IAW VASRD §4.114.
After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable
doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic abdominal pain
condition, coded 7399-7301.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB
reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the chronic abdominal pain was operant in this
case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the
matter of the chronic abdominal pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a
disability rating of 10%, coded 7399-7301 IAW VASRD §4.114, with the absence of reproductive
organs and the tacked bladder conditions as not unfitting or separately compensable. There
were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:
VASRD CODE
7399-7301
COMBINED
RATING
10%
10%
Chronic Abdominal Pain, Post-surgical
UNFITTING CONDITION
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20111216, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
3 PD1101139
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120019259 (PD201101139)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.
Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s
recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization
of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected
accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and
to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
4 PD1101139
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00758
The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The VA reduced the rating for this condition to 0% effective 9 October 2009, 4 years after separation. Service Treatment Record
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01186
Endometriosis. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Endometriosis, Stage II 7629 COMBINED 30% 30% 3 PD1201186 The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120611, w/atchs Exhibit B. Service...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01789
The MEB examiner described the CI’s current functional status as “required to miss fairly frequent work duties due to the migraine headaches.”The MEB examiner provided a pain rating of slight/intermittent.The commander’s statement noted that “at various times” the CI had to “leave work due to migraines or abdominal pains that incapacitates her to work.”The VA C&P exam on 25 February 2005, performed 2 monthsafter separation, did not address the migraine condition, but listed 12 conditions...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01123
SEPARATION DATE: 20020920 The Board noted endometriosis was not diagnosed while on active duty (or subsequently) and not seen at the time of the cesarean section and later hysterectomy. The Board then considered the appropriate code and rating for the chronic pelvic pain.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00510
The PEB adjudicated chronic low back pain s/p intradiscal electrothermal therapy and pelvic adhesive disease without documented partial obstruction, as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, with application of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and AR 635‐40. The Board notes the VA ratings for other conditions documented at the time of separation and for conditions not diagnosed while in the service (but later determined to be service‐connected by the VA). The CI’s condition...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00634
The PEB adjudicated the chronic abdominal and pelvic pain secondary to endometriosis as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02057
SEPARATION DATE: 20050811 Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01072
At her first TDRL periodic evaluation, the CI’s endometriosis not controlled by treatment condition was found not sufficiently stabilized to permit final adjudication, while her back and knee pain were changed to not unfitting at that time. The CI was continued on the TDRL with a 30% rating for endometriosis. After her subsequent and final TDRL periodic evaluation, the IPEB determined the CI’s status post TAH/BSO in treatment of endometriosis, with intermittent cramping, pelvic pain...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00954
The PEB adjudicated “chronic pelvic pain syndrome associated with chronic interstitial cystitis and pain disorder as unfitting, rated 30% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and placed the CI on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).The PEB also adjudicated the migraine headaches as a Category II condition (one that can be unfitting but is not currently compensable or ratable). The Board then reviewed the medical records in evidence. BOARD FINDINGS :...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00816
The CI had a history of chronic urinary urgency, frequency, nocturia, and pelvic pain with urination and she was diagnosed with interstitial cystitis in April 2001. A note a month later indicated the CI was voiding every 3 to 4 hours during the day and had nocturia once nightly. A 10% disability rating is assigned for daytime voiding interval between 2 and 3 hours, or; awakening to void 2 times per night and the available record contains no evidence to support a frequency greater than this...