Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01056
Original file (PD2011-01056.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army

CASE NUMBER: PD1101056 SEPARATION DATE: 20090227

BOARD DATE: 20121016

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PVT/E-2 (68W/Trainee), medically separated for right femoral neck stress fracture and left sacroiliitis with referred pain to the hip. The CI complained of bilateral atraumatic hip pain. A bone scan revealed a right femoral neck stress fracture. Despite aggressive physical therapy (PT), crutches narcotic and non narcotic medications, the CI failed to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. The CI was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded right hip pain secondary to femoral neck stress fracture and left sacroilitis condition on the DA Form 3947 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Adjustment disorder condition, identified in the rating chart below, was also identified and forwarded by the MEB as a medically acceptable condition. The PEB adjudicated the right femoral neck stress fracture condition and left sacroiliitis with referred pain to the hip condition as unfitting with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), rated 10% and 10% respectively. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 20% disability rating.

CI CONTENTION: “Not all my medical conditions were considered.”

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The right femoral neck stress fracture and left sacroiliitis with referred pain to the hip conditions requested for consideration meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview, and are accordingly addressed below. The adjustment disorder is not a condition constituting a physical disability and is not compensable IAW DoDI 1332.38, Encl 5 and will not be addressed below. The remaining conditions rated by the VA at separation and listed on the DA Form 294 application are not within the Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20090202 VA (4 Mo. After Separation) – All Effective Date 20090228
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Femoral Neck Stress Fracture 5299-5255 10% Right Hip Strain 5252 10% 20090606
Left Sacroilitis with Referred Pain to the Hip 5299-5236 10% Left Hip Acetabular Labral Tear 5252 10% 20090606
Adjustment Disorder Not a Physical Disability Depressive Disorder (claimed as adjustment disorder with depression) 9434 30% 20090606
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis (claimed as Pes Planus) 5276 10% 20090606
Right Patello-Femoral Syndrome with Chronic Exertional Anterior Compartment Syndrome 5260 10% 20090606
Left Patello-Femoral Syndrome … 5260 10% 20090606
Not Service Connected x 2 20090606
Combined: 20% Combined: 60%

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) is responsible for maintaining a fit and vital fighting force. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. However the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate service-connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the Veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time.

Right Femoral Neck Stress Fracture Condition. There were two goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Right Hip (Thigh) ROM MEB ~1 Mo. Pre-Sep PT ~2 Mo. Pre-Sep
Flexion (0-125⁰) 105⁰ 110⁰*
Extension (0-20⁰) 10⁰ 20⁰
External Rotation (0-45⁰) 45⁰ 45⁰
Abduction (0-45⁰) 40⁰ 35⁰
Adduction (0-45⁰) 20⁰ 20⁰

Comment:

Right hip xray neg

Bone scan low grade stress fracture right femoral head

Normal gait; tenderness to palpation (TTP) in right groin/anterior/superior iliac spine; out toeing 60⁰ Pain with weight bearing, standing, walking; pain on repetitive motion
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%

The CI has a well documented history of right hip pain in the service treatment record (STR) starting in September 2008 through to October 2011. The CI was first seen for hip pain in September 2008 with exam findings of right hip TTP and pain with flexion, adduction and internal rotation along with tenderness with ambulation. A hip X-ray done at that time was negative. A bone scan done one week later demonstrated low grade stress fracture of the right femoral neck. The CI was seen in PT for worsening right hip pain with positive Obers test, FABER test, FADIR, Scour test, and Thomas test. The PT note in indicated that the pain was aggravated by walking, standing, getting up from a chair, bending at the waist and lifting/carrying a rucksack and that the pain was dulled by medication but not relieved. A repeat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the right hip stress fracture. The MEB examination a month prior to separation indicated failed PT with right hip pain and discomfort constantly present and aggravated with activity. The examiner opined that the functional impairment was an inability to move with a fighting load at least two miles; construct an individual fighting position and perform 3 to 5 second rushes under direct and indirect fire; an inability to engage in a standard to alternate APFT event and required additional limitations of no running, jumping or marching, no rucksack or individual body armor; no lifting or carrying more than 20 pounds and no prolonged standing for greater than 30 minutes. The MEB documented pain-limited ROMs as summarized above.

The VA Compensation & Pension (C&P) examination, performed 4 months after separation, documented worsening of the right hip pain and stiffness symptoms with standing, walking and strenuous activity with a moderate functional impairment with daily activities. The pain-limited ROMs are charted above. X-ray was normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the right femoral neck stress fracture analogous to 5255, Femur, impairment of: With slight knee or hip disability and rated 10%. The VA coded the right hip strain condition as 5252, Thigh, limitation of flexion and rated 10%. The PEB and the VA chose different coding options; however, this did not materially affect the rating. Neither coding is predominating, and all exams were ratable at 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right femoral neck stress fracture condition.

Left Sacroilitis with Referred Pain to the Hip Condition: There were two goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Left Hip (Thigh) ROM MEB ~1 Mo. Pre-Sep PT ~2 Mo. Pre-Sep
Flexion (0-125⁰) 95⁰ 60⁰-90⁰*
Extension (0-20⁰) 10⁰ 15-30⁰*
External Rotation (0-45⁰) 45⁰ 30⁰
Abduction (0-45⁰) 30⁰ 35⁰
Adduction (0-45⁰) 26⁰ 20⁰

Comment:

Left hip xray neg;

Bone scan no stress fracture;

2008 MRI: no fracture

SI Joint xray neg;

2009 MRI: labral tear

Normal gait; pain with walking; TTP over SI joint; straight leg raise 60 degrees; +Faber’s; tenderness over SI joint Pain with weight bearing, standing, walking; pain on repetitive motion
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%

The CI’s was first seen for left hip pain in September 2008 with exam findings of TTP and pain with flexion, adduction and internal rotation along with tenderness with ambulation. A hip X-ray done at that time was negative. A bone scan done a week later demonstrated a focal stress change of the left femoral neck without fracture. The CI was seen in PT for left hip pain with a positive Scour test, and positive Thomas test. The Orthopedics consult in
3 December 2008 noted TTP, posterior pain in the SI joint. An MRI done at that time noted no evidence of a left hip stress fracture. An SI joint X-ray was normal. The CI was seen in follow up by Orthopedics for left hip pain in January 2009 with findings of a positive impingement test in the anterior and posterior left hip and it was noted that the more the CI walked, there was more pain. The MEB examination indicated complaints of left hip pain greater than the right hip. The examiner noted complaints of referred pain to the left hip however findings suggested nontenderness over the greater trochanter, posterior hip and within the left groin. Based on symptomotology, the CI was diagnosed with left hip sacroiliitis.

The C&P examination documented increased symptoms, and pain limited ROMs as charted above. A left hip MRI performed in February 2009 demonstrated an anterior superior acetabulum labral tear. The examiner opined that there was a moderate functional impairment with daily activities.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB found this left sacroilitis with referred pain to the hip condition unfitting at 10% coded analogously to 5236 (Sacroiliac injury and weakness) which uses the criteria of the general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine with application of §4.59 painful motion. The VA coding of the left hip acetabular labral tear condition as 5252 Thigh, limitation of flexion of: Flexion limited to 45⁰, rated 10%; differed from the PEB but did not impact the level of disability rating. Neither coding is predominate, and all exams were ratable at 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left sacroilitis with referred pain to the hip condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right femoral neck stress fracture condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the left sacroilitis with referred pain to the hip condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Femoral Neck Stress Fracture 5299-5255 10%
Left Sacroilitis with Referred Pain to the Hip 5299-5236 10%
COMBINED 20%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20111107, w/atchs

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

SFMR-RB

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency

(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120019250 (PD201101056)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.

This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Deputy Assistant Secretary

(Army Review Boards)

CF:

( ) DoD PDBR

( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00678

    Original file (PD2009-00678.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Antalgic gait; Neurostimulator in place§4.71a Rating10%20%20%20%The MEB exam on 18 October 2006, four months prior to separation, indicated the CI had an antalgic gait, positive SLR, and subjective numbness to the left groin. Although the VA exam did not document antalgic gait, it met the ROM criteria for a 20% evaluation and the Board could not reasonably consider different portions of different exams for a less favorable rating. In the matter of the GERD condition, or any other medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01123

    Original file (PD2010-01123.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Other Conditions. The Board therefore has no basis for recommending the PTSD condition as an additional unfitting condition for separation rating. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review xxxxxx records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02128

    Original file (PD-2013-02128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On exam there was TTP of the neck with negative testing for nervecompression (Spurling’s), with normal ROM and normal bilateral UE examination.At the MEB examination on 21 October 2004, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic neck pain without radicular symptoms. The NARSUM notes the CI had a history of hip pain (trochanteric bursitis), with normal bilateral hip X-rays.Notes in the STR indicated that in April 2000 the CI reported 5 weeks of right hip pain. At the MEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02473

    Original file (PD-2014-02473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left hip. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Hip Pain5299-525510%Residuals, Left Femoral Neck Fracture525520%20090504Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 8 RATING 10%RATING: 30% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20090731(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). Left Hip Pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00484

    Original file (PD-2014-00484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left femoral neck completed stress fracture condition, was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Left Hip Condition . Left Hip (Thigh) ROM (Degrees)MEB ~ 2 Mos.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00029

    Original file (PD2012-00029.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hip pain was also noted on knee ROM testing. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120020004 (PD201200029)

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01143

    Original file (PD2012-01143.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201143 SEPARATION DATE: 20021215 BOARD DATE: 20130205 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PV1/E-1 (31U10/Signal Support Systems Specialist) medically separated for chronic pain after surgical pinning of her left femoral neck stress fracture. Her left hip condition could not be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00549

    Original file (PD2012-00549.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated non-displaced left-sided femoral neck stress fracture condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Left Femoral Neck Stress Fracture Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02079

    Original file (PD-2014-02079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner noted X-rays of both hips performed on 12 August 2009 were normal.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 29 October 2009, 9 months after separation, there was full ROM of both hips with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00751

    Original file (PD2012-00751.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the left hip condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Left Hip Condition. The Board acknowledges the X-ray evidence revealed a healed stress fracture therefore the VA could not consider coding with the 5255 code and further notes the VA ratable data allows the minimum compensable 10% rating for painful motion.