RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1000080 SEPARATION
DATE: 20011108
BOARD DATE: 20110727
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record
reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (55D,
Explosive Ordnance Disposal) medically separated for chronic low back pain
(LBP). The CI injured his back in 1999 after a twisting injury. He was
treated, but did not respond adequately to fully perform his military
duties or meet physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent
profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The LBP condition
was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically
unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. The PEB found the chronic LBP condition
unfitting and rated it 10%, with application of DoDI 1332.39 and AR 635-40.
The CI accepted the PEB findings, and was medically separated with 10%
disability IAW the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating
Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Army and DoD regulations.
CI CONTENTION: “After being medically separated from the Army for my back
condition (10%), I believe that I was given the lowest rating for this
injury. As a patient continuing treatment, my assessment for my back
condition is diagnosed differently due to the VA's finding and medical
treatment. I would like the Physical Disability Board of Review to re-
evaluate my case. The MRB in 2001 evaluated me with lumbosacral strain.
The Department of Veterans Affairs evaluated me with degenerative joint
disease with right lower extremity neuralgia effective in September 2004.”
RATING COMPARISON:
|Army PEB – dated 20010712 |VA (8 mo. After Separation) – All |
| |Effective 20011109 |
|Condition |Code |Rating |
|Final Combined: 10% |Total Combined: 60% |
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Low Back Pain. The CI had a twisting injury of his back in November 1999.
Following the injury, he had low back pain, which radiated into the right
leg. In February 2000, he underwent L5-S1 diskectomy and hemilaminectomy.
His surgery was successful, and completely resolved his radicular symptoms
in the right leg. Over the course of several months, his low back pain
gradually returned, without any pain or other symptoms in the legs. He
underwent physical therapy and had good results. However, he was unable to
fully perform his required military duties, and was unable to meet Army
physical fitness standards. His pain was mostly in the morning, and after
physical exertion. The CI was examined at Fort Knox on 22 June 2001. He
had full active range of motion. His straight leg raise was negative, but
there was some "tightness" with the right. Muscle strength was normal in
both legs. His reflexes were normal, and he was non-tender to palpation.
In November 2001, at the time of his separation from service, the July 2001
VASRD was in effect. Back in 2001, lumbar spine range of motion impairment
was judged to be slight (10%), moderate (20%), or severe (40%), based upon
the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity. In this case, the CI’s
back examination on 22 June 2001 did not show any thoraco-lumbar limitation
of motion. As noted above, the only abnormality found on the MEB back
examination was some “tightness” with straight leg raise on the right. On
10 July 2002, the CI had a general medical examination at the VA Medical
Center in Tomah, WI. At that exam, he was able to bend forward 90 degrees
with no pain, but when he came back up to the upright position he had
moderate pain in the lumbosacral area. Also, bending 20 degrees to the
left caused minor discomfort. Straight leg raise was negative, reflexes
were normal, and there were no neurological findings in the lower
extremities.
The Board carefully examined all of the available evidence. The Board
evaluated the CI’s low back condition, with application of the 2001 VASRD
coding and rating criteria, not the current coding and rating criteria. As
noted above, the CI had no thoraco-lumbar limitation of motion on 22 June
2001. However, he did have characteristic pain on motion. Following due
deliberation, and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board
unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10% for chronic low back
pain. There was no documented evidence of disabling peripheral nerve
involvement (radiculopathy).
Remaining Conditions. Shoulder pain, scar on left thigh, and several other
conditions were noted in the Disability Evaluation System (DES) file. None
of these conditions were the basis for profiling and none were implicated
in the commander’s statement. These conditions were all reviewed by the
action officer and considered by the Board. It was determined that none
could be argued as unfitting and subject to separation rating.
Additionally, other conditions were noted in the VA rating decision
proximal to separation, but were not documented in the DES file. The Board
does not have the authority to render fitness or rating recommendations for
any conditions not considered by the DES. The Board therefore has no
reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for
separation rating.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department
regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by
the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at
the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the chronic low back pain,
the Board unanimously recommends a disability separation rating of 10%, IAW
§4.71a of the 2001 VASRD. In the matter of the shoulder pain, scar on left
thigh, or any other conditions eligible for consideration, the Board
unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for
additional rating at separation.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board therefore recommends that there be no re-
characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
|UNFITTING CONDITION |VASRD CODE |RATING |
|Chronic Low Back Pain |5299-5295 |10% |
|COMBINED |10% |
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20100112, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.
XXXXXXXXX
President
Physical
Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ARMY REVIEW BOARDS AGENCY
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508
28 SEP 2011
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB I WRAMC, Building 7, Washington, D.C. 20307-5001
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review
Recommendation
for AR20110018879 (PD201000080)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability
Board of
Review (000 PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to
the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code,
section 1554a,
I accept the Board's recommendation and hereby deny the individual's
application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any
Members of
Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of
this decision
by mail.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
CF:
( ) 000 PDBR
( ) OVA
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00881
5299-5295Chronic Low Back Pain, Myofascial5010-529220%20030203 An urgent care treatment note dated 21 September 2001 (6 months prior to separation) noted muscle spasm, with significantly increased pain and “60% of expected range of motion.” On 1October 2001, his commander endorsed that the CI was not fit for continued service due to the duty limitations secondary to his back injury.At the MEB exam, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported pain in the right lower lumbar region,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01497
The MEB also forwarded right shoulder pain, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hypercholesterolemia, identified in the rating chart below, as not disqualifying.The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic LBP conditionas unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to meet retention standards and therefore to be not unfittingand not ratable.The CI made no...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00426
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic LBP condition with lumbar spondylosis, and bulging disc as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The final orthopedic consultation noted normal lumbar spine appearance, ROM, no tenderness and no spasm, with normal gait and stance and recommended referral to the MEB. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXX,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01541
The chronic LBP condition, characterized as mechanical low back pain was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5295 10% Spondylosis of the Lumbosacral Spine 5295 10% 20020226 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x N/A Combined: 10% Combined: 10% ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Chronic Low Back Pain Condition: The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), dated 03 May 2001, 5 months prior to...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00524
The MEB also forwarded right shoulder pain, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hypercholesterolemia, identified in the rating chart below, as not disqualifying.The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic LBP conditionas unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to meet retention standards and therefore to be not unfittingand not ratable.The CI made no...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00761
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200761 SEPARATION DATE: 20020116 BOARD DATE: 20121218 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard Soldier, SGT/E‐5 (45E, assigned to a Hull Systems Mechanic slot, 63E), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) accompanied by neck pain with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01090
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20030805 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1201090 BOARD DATE: 20130130 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (31R/Telecommunication Operator), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). Chronic Low Back Pain Condition. Medications, which the CI had tried, included non-steroidal...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020
Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01058
IAW DoDI 6040.44, this Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation based on the VASRD standards in effect at that time. An outpatient examination on 21 November 2001 (7 months prior to separation) documented a negative straight leg raise (SLR) test and normal muscle strength, sensation and DTRs. At a later C&P exam on 23 June 2003 (a year after separation), the CI reported constant low back dull, aching pain.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00933
The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Chronic Low Back Pain .The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI sustained a lifting injury in March 2001 causing severe low back pain (LBP). The Board must apply the VASRD rating criteria in effect on the date of the CI’s separation and the Board did...