RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: air force
CASE NUMBER: PD0900214 COMPONENT: active
BOARD DATE: 20090625 SEPARATION DATE: 20060426
________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an Air Force Staff Sergeant Aerospace Medical Service Craftsman medically separated in 2006 after seven years of active service. She was experienced shortness of breath with wheezing and was diagnosed with asthma in October 2005 when her symptoms had begun to limit her physical performance. With a diagnosis of asthma she was not worldwide deployable and was referred for a fitness evaluation. The Air Force Informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found her unfit for continued service and she was separated with a 10% disability rating for 6602 Asthma using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. The 10% rating was based on the severity of her symptoms determined from her pulmonary functions tests both on and off medications. Using an evaluation done seven months after separation from the Air Force, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated this disability as 6602 Asthma at 30% based on use of daily inhalational bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory medication. The VA also rated 8599-8510 Thoracic outlet syndrome, 5237 Thoracolumbar strain, and 7508-7509 Nephrolithiasis all at 10% and 7799-7702 left axillary lymphadenopathy and facial acne both at 0% for a combined total of 60%. The CI contended that her rating from the Air Force should be the same as the rating from the VA.
________________________________________________________________
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board used the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD) as the most favorable basis for rating. After careful consideration of all available information, the Board concluded that the CI’s condition is appropriately rated at a 30% for 6602 Asthma. This rating is based on the CI’s requirement for daily inhalational bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory medication.
Although the CI did not contend that the other conditions rated by the VA should also be rated, the Board examined these conditions and did not find any to be unfitting at the time of separation.
________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect disability retirement, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation.
| Unfitting Condition | VASRD Code | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Asthma | 6602 | 30% |
| Combined | 30% |
________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090217, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veteran's Affairs Treatment Record.
Office of the Assistant Secretary
PDBR PD-2009-00214
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
AUG 27 2009
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of
Review and under the authority of Section 1554, Title 10, United States Code (122 Stat. 466) and
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat. 116) it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. The diagnosis in her finding of unfitness for asthma, VARSD code 6602 was rated at
30% rather than 10%.
b. On 25 April 2006, she elected spouse and children coverage under the Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) based on full retired pay.
c. She was not discharged on 26 April 2006 with entitlement to disability severance pay;
rather, on that date she was released from active duty and on 27 April 2006 her name was placed on
the Permanent Disability Retired List.
This document contains information which must be protected lAW AFl 33-332 and DoD
Regulation 5400.11j Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended Applies) and it is For
Official Use Only (FOUO)."
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03148
Both the Air Force PEB and the VA coded the pulmonary condition 6602 (Asthma). The PEB rated it 10%, and the VA rated it 30%. Eight months later, she was using the anti-inflammatory corticosteroid Motametasone.Following a thorough review of the evidence in the treatment record, the Board concluded that it was more likely than not that the CI was using inhalational anti-inflammatory medication at the time of separation from service.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00115
The Asthma was determined to be medically unacceptable and the CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The PEB determined she was unfit for continued military service and she was separated with a 10% disability rating using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. Although the CI’s pulmonary function testing never documented FEV1 or FEV1/FVC% measurements that reached the minimum...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00221
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. At the time she separated from service DoDI 1332.39 was in effect and it stated that response to therapy was to be considered in all cases. c. She was not discharged on 4 August 2005 with entitlement to disability severance...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00427
The CI was therefore medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Asthma Condition . Given the consistent record of the CI’s being prescribed and using daily medication, the CI meets the 30% criteria of “daily inhalational or oral bronchodilator therapy, or; inhalational anti-inflammatory medication.” All evidence considered, the Board recommends coding 6602 at 30% as the fair, permanent separation rating for Asthma in this case.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01963
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board next considered that at the time of separation, although the CI’s asthma was relatively well controlled,treatment notes in the STR, the MEB and C&P exams consistently documented use of the anti-inflammatory inhaler and oral bronchodilator medications, with...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01707
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-01707BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20141107 The MEB physical exam noted a normal respiratory rate at rest and a normal lung examination.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM)(5 months prior to separation) noted a diagnosis of “mild persistent asthma, with exercise induced component.” The MEB dated 5 August 2005 (performed 4 months prior to separation) recommended a return to duty. The IPEB (7...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00766
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: air force CASE NUMBER: PD1100766 SEPARATION DATE: 20050509 BOARD DATE: 20120308 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Staff Sergeant/E-5 (3M071 / Services Craftsman), medically separated for asthma. Asthma Condition. In the matter of the asthma condition, the Board unanimously recommends a permanent service...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01324
Asthma Condition . VASRD §4.97 defines both PFT-derived criteria and clinical treatment criteria for rating under 6602.The remoteness of the available VA C&P examination justifies probative value given to the MEB examination and its single PFT obtained three months prior to separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02236
In December 2004 theMEB found the asthma condition had stabilized sufficiently and the PEB adjudicated “exertion asthma” unfitting, rated at 10% disability and the CI was removed from the TDRL on 30 December 2004. The Board deliberated if the TDRL NARSUM current medications’listing oral Singulair was supported by the record and if it met the VASRD 6602 30% rating criteria for daily oral bronchodilator therapy.The Board discussed the evidence of record concerning Singulair use.Singulair was...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00908
SEPARATION DATE: 20040312 Asthma Condition . The diagnosis in his finding of unfitness for Asthma,VASRD Code 6602, was rated at 30% rather than 10%.