RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD0900162 COMPONENT: RESERVE
BOARD DATE: 20090625 SEPARATION DATE: 20040123
________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an NCO medically separated from the Army in 2004 after 10 years of combined service. The medical basis for the separation was a back condition. He was a truck driver who injured his back when rear-ended by another vehicle during convoy operations in Iraq. He was subsequently evacuated from theater and underwent medical evaluation. He was diagnosed with Grade 2 spondylolisthesis (slippage of vertebra) and disc disease. This was not amendable to surgery and did not respond well enough to conservative management for continued service. There were no other injuries or medical conditions associated with this case. He was referred to the PEB, found unfit and separated at 10% disability. He was evaluated by the VA less than two months from separation and likewise rated 10% (currently at 20%). The CI contends for medical retirement, citing his current level of disability and employment issues.
________________________________________________________________
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the PDBR to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. It is possible that the service-specific ‘pain rule’ may have tempered the rating exam of the back. The Board, however, did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised which would have had a significant adverse impact on rating. The PEB coding was appropriate, and rating was derived from the general rating formula for the spine IAW VASRD §4.71a. The MEB and VA exams were similar and rated equivalently. The Board unanimously concluded that the PEB adjudication was fair.
________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION:
The Board therefore recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s Physical Evaluation Board adjudication.
________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090128, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00037
Additionally, the CI had already been on a period of TDRL prior to final separation rating. They are not useful for final separation rating, but are useful for rating upon entry into the TDRL period. In the matter of the sinus condition or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01819
A Reconsideration PEB (Recon PEB) adjudicated the same diagnosis (chronic LBP), but rated 10% disability due to service aggravation; the case was adjudicated with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Physical therapy (PT) evaluation on 19 July 2004 noted no radicular symptoms were present and the examination showed decreased ROM described as “20% limited all directions”, with pain with flexion, and positive testing for sacroiliac pain, with an...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00570
Three months prior to separation, the PEB adjudicated the mechanical LBP post MVA condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the DoD Instruction 1332.39 and Application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) under spine rules applicable on or before 23 September 2002. At the MEB exam, 5 months before separation, the CI reported pain‐“pains that radiate down the leg from back pains” on the DD 2807 without elaboration in the NARSUM. Service...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00707
The PEB and VA chose the same coding options for the condition, and based their rating recommendations on the 2002 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine which were in effect at the time of CI’s separation. The PEB assigned a 10% rating coded 5293 (IDS) for mild pain with no objective painful motion. The challenge before the Board was to carefully review the C&P exam and the service treatment record (STR) for evidence of a disability meeting 40% rating criteria under the old spine...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02071
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB rated the back condition 10%, coded 5237 (lumbosacral strain) and the VA rated it 10%, coded 5243 (intervertebral disc...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00177
The CI was medically separated by the PEB at 10% disability for depression with elements of PTSD. The case should have been adjudicated IAW VASRD §4.129 and the Board must therefore recommend a 50% TDRL rating at separation, coded 9434-9411. TBI was alluded to in the VA psychiatric rating examination, but the condition has yet to be coded and rated by the VA.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00661
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20010926 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200661 BOARD DATE: 20130108 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (11B20/Infantryman) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). Based on the evidence in the treatment record, the Board unanimously agreed that the CI’s low back condition...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00051
The PEB originally rated the HNP at 10%; however, the PDA made an administrative change to 20% IAW the changes required by the NDAA which took effect following the PEB and before CI’s service separation. The Board clearly noted that the Army PDA administratively changed the PEB’s original 10% determination to 20% IAW NDAA. The Board determined that the CI’s HNP rating should be increased to 40% using the more current and complete ROMs from the VA exam.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01661
The back condition, characterized as “low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Physical Disability Board of Review I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00576
CI CONTENTION : “Veteran condition of low back pain due to lumbar degenerative disc disease was more severe than range of motion result indicated. Low Back Condition . The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES.