Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00131
Original file (FD-2015-00131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVI EW BOARD H EARING RECORD
AME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST 1\1100LE fNfTL.\L)      GRADE
{b){6)
TYPE HO         I        PERSONA L APPEARANCE    x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COl!l'iSEI.      NA\IE OF COSEI. \1\D OR ORGA.V. l7-ATION    ADDRES A\D OR ORGA)lll.ATIO:< Of'COl.J"NSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE or THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    OE
{b){6)     X+

X+ X+ X+




ISSlJES


AO l .00


tNO&X NUMBER


A42.00
X+
EXlllOITS SUBMIITED TOTHE BOARD I ORIJtR Al' POINTING Tl-IE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETIER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMIITED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCC
TAPE Rl:COKDLNG OJ- Pl:RSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


H&ARL"'G DATE    CME NLMBER

02 Jul 2015      FD-2015-00131
APPUCAlff SISS\lt. AND TIE BQAJU)"S O[Cl.SIONAL l\ATIOl<llU:AR.E OISCUSSW ON THE ATTACHVlAIJ\FOACE OLSCHAAOE UYreW llOOECLSIOlfAl. lATIONALE

Case heard in Washington. D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance wi th/wi thout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the A FBCM R.








+ CHA GE REASO A D A UTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY
{b)(6)    -
        -



TO:
L"IOO    Ml:1'11 1        LAI
f'RO)I:
; 8l51l0h

SAF/MRBR         SffRllARY OFTll&AIR FORCE PERS0"\LC0l"'C1L
AIR FORCt DI CHARCE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STRFET WE T SUITE 40       11.l< C'0\1\IAVO DR. l:ll Wl:<G. JRO Fl.OOR
RANDOLPH AFB.TX 78150-4742       A."'DR£WSAl"'& MD 20762-70tl


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2015-00131

GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief.

ISSUE: The applicant received an Honorable discharge for Personality Disorder

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant' s discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. In order to adhere to Mental Health Amendments to 10 USC 1553, a physician with specialized training on mental health disorders was present for this board. The applicant 's record of service included three Letters of Reprimand and three Letters of Counseling. Her misconduct included failure to report to duty on time (4x), and failure ofroom inspection (2x).

The applicant contends that her discharge was improper due to misdiagnoses of adjustment disorder. The applicant also provided documentation in regards to military service members being misdiagnosed with personality disorder rather than Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSO). The record indicates the applicant was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. There was no indication that she was ever diagnosed with a personality disorder as shown on her DD214. The ORB found that the stigma of havi ng personality disorder appear on the 00214 to be harsh and unwarranted. Although the Board does not condone applicant's misconduct , the ORB finds sufficient evidence to consider her narrative reason inappropriate. As such, the Board grants change of reason and authority for discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the reason for the discharge is more accurately described as Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Title l0, USC 1553.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00071

    Original file (FD-2014-00071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDH EARINGRECORDNAME:OFSE:RVICEMEMBE:R (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIA L)CR/\0£ A FSNISSANRECORDREVIEWCUUNSt:L1-- ---.- ---1NAIEOFCOUNSELANOORORGAN17*\ TIONAODRt:SSANOORORGANl7AT IONOFCOUNSELt-\_ES--+- No----1(b) ( 6) x A42.00GEN UOTllC' OTHERE:XlllBITSSUBMITI'EJ)TO TllEBOARD llf.ARINC 01\TE 16 Oct2014 FD-2014-00071 ORDERAPPOINTINOTiii'BOARD2 Al'PLICArlONFORRl VltWOF DISC!I ARGE3 LEITEROFNOiIFICJ\lION4 llRltFOFPERSONNEL Fill;COUNSEL"SRloLEt\SE IU·1...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00071

    Original file (FD 2014 00071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDH EARINGRECORDNAME:OFSE:RVICEMEMBE:R (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIA L)CR/\0£ A FSNISSANRECORDREVIEW CUUNSt:L NA IEOFCOUNSELANOORORGAN 17*\ TION AODRt:SSANOORORGANl7ATION OFCOUNSEL 1-- ---.- ---1\ESx (b) (6) (b) (6) MEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTllC' OTHERE:XlllBITSSUBMITI'EJ)TO TllEBOARD llf.ARINC 01\TE 16 Oct2014 FD-2014-00071 ORDERAPPOINTINOTiii'BOARD2 Al'PLICArlONFORRl VltWOF DISC!I ARGE3 LEITEROFNOiIFICJ\lION4 llRltFOFPERSONNEL Fill;COUNSEL"SRloLEt\SE IU·1...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00007

    Original file (FD-2015-00007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforachangetothereasonandauthority forthedischarge. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoardgrantstherequestedrelief.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00696

    Original file (FD-2014-00696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appeals to change thereasonandauthorityforthedischarge. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined and requeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached brief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00719

    Original file (FD-2013-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof discharge toHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined and requeststhatthe review becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors leadingtothe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceiveda BadConductDischargeviaSpecialCourtMartial.The AirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilitytoexaminetheproprietyand equi...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00588

    Original file (FD-2013-00588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Board grants upgrade of the discharge,change of narrative reason and change of thereenlistmentcode. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00080

    Original file (FD-2015-00080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00665

    Original file (FD-2014-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandtochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withoutcounsel,at AndrewsAFBonMarch12,2015 Thefollowingadditionalexhibitswere submittedatthe hearing: Exhibit#5:Applicant'sadditionalmedicaldocumentsTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00444

    Original file (FD-2014-00444.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.