Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00473
Original file (FD-2013-00473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REV IEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERV ICE MEMBER (LAST.FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
(b)(6)
GRAOE
TYP[ GEN x     I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE I     RECORD REVIEW
COVNSf.L NAME or COUNS[I. A DOR ORGAN IZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORG\NI ZATION OF COUNSEL
YES No
x

MEM BER SITTING
VOTEOFTHE llOAHO
llON GEN UOTllC OTHER DENY
(b)(6) x
x
x
x
x
ISSUES   A94.05 INDEX Nl!Mll:t R   A67.10 EXHIBITS SUBM11TEO TOTHE BOARO
1 ORDER APPOINTING TllE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFIC/\TION
4 BRIEFOF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO TllE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXII!BITS SUBMIT! ED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL. A PPEARANCE 11EARING

!If.AH.INC 1)1\'fE

30 Apr 20 15
C#\SE·'UMIH R

FD-2013-00473
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND rue OOt\JlO'S DEflSICl'IALRATIONALE ARE OISCllSSEDON TllFAllACHED AIR FORCEDISCllARGEREVIEW BOARD OECISIONAL R,\TIONALll.
Case hea rd in Washi ngton, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a persona lappearance with/without counsel,and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.










'(b)(6)
INOORSl<:MENT     DATE: 5/8/20 15
1'0:
S/\F/MRBR
550 <. STREE I wi:s·1. SUIII:40
RANDOLPll AFB. TX 78 150-4742
FRO.\I :
SECRJ::TARY OFlll E A l R FORCE PERSONNE i.COIJNrt l.
AIR FORCE DISCll1\R CE RE\'IE\\' UOARO 1535 CO.llIANO DR, EE \\'ING,JRD FLOOR ANDR:J:WS AF'R ,.\11) 11761.700 1
AFHQ FORM 0-2077 , JAN 00      (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE R EVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONA LE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00473

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available perti nent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief.

ISSUE: The applicant recei ved a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is autho1ized to change the characte1ization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ln reviewi ng discharges, the Board presumes regularity i n the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included two A1iicle l 5s. His misconduct included failure to refrain from climbing a water tower on base and entering a controlled area; drunk and disorderl y conduct; and disrespectful language towards two NCOs .

The applicant contends discharge was inequi table because it was based on two isolated incidents and he was not given time for probation and rehabili tation. The Board opined that the evidence contained i n the record does suppo11the applicanf s claim that the discharge was based on two isolated incidents during his career. After a thorough review of the record and the information suppl ied by the appl icant, the ORB determi ned there is sufficien t evidence to support his cla im of inequity. Although the Board does not condone applicant's misconduct , the Board finds that the applicant's work environment and lack of leadership by example within his duty section played a role in his misconduct. The Board determined that the appl icant's overall good duty performance outweighed his minor discipli nary infractions. As such, the Board grants an upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The Discharge Review Board concl udes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substanti ve requirements of the discharge regu lation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrati ve due process.

However, in view of the foregoi ng findi ngs, the Board concludes that the overall qua!ity of applicant" s service is more accurately reflected by an Honorable discharge under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1 553.

A ttachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00214

    Original file (FD 2014 00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00214

    Original file (FD-2014-00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00019

    Original file (FD-2015-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable;achangetothenarrativereasonandachangetothereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors lead ingto the discharge. FINDJNG: TheBoarddenies theupgradeof the discharge;reasonandauthorityfor discharge andchangeofreenlistmentcode. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00750

    Original file (FD-2014-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandachangeofreasontothenarrative.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl ined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe available servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinent data ontheappl icant and thefactors lead ing tothe discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00105

    Original file (FD 2014 00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischarge, changetothenarrative reason, andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00761

    Original file (FD-2014-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDiscipl inaryInfractionsTheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00105

    Original file (FD-2014-00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischarge, changetothenarrative reason, andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00101

    Original file (FD 2014 00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions