Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00223
Original file (FD-2014-00223.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEM BER (LAST, FI RST i'lll DOLf: IN ITIA i,)



PERSONAL APPEARANCE

GRADE



x        RECORD REVIEW

A FSNISSAN



YES      Nu
x

ADDRESS AN l) OR ORG,\ 17-ATION OF COONSt:I.





VOTE OF THE BOARD

MEMBER SITTING
llON     GEN      UOTllC'

OTllER   DENY
x x x x
x


A42.00
EXHIBITSSUBMITTED TO Tll E BOAHO
J ORDER APPOINT ING Tl 11:130ARI)
APPLICAT ION FOR REVIEW 01' DISC'llARGE
I F.HER 01'NOTll'ICJ\T ION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FI LE
C'OUNSEl.'S R ELEASE TO Tl IE BOARD ADDITIONA L EXI llH ITS SUBMITrED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL 1\PPEAR1\NCI:
11\l>E RECORU IN( i OF PERSONAi. Al' l'EARANCE llEAIUN(J


llEARINC OAT!::

CASt: l"MU£R

18 Sep 20 14     FD-2014-00223
N'PL ICA'll"S ISSUE A1'D TllE DOARD'S DEC"ISIONAL RATIONALr ARE DISC! fSSP.I) ON TllE ATTACllfO AIR FORre OISCllARG e REVIEW BOARD DCi.>101'Al. RATIONALll.

Case heard i n Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance wi th/without counsel, and the right to subm it an application to the A FBCM R.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.












TO:


SAF/MRBR
550 (' Sl REET \VEST. SU ITE 40 RANDOLP I I AFB. 1X 781 50-4742


FROM:



SECRJ·:·rAR\' Or TllE ,\ Ill. i·;oitct PtRSONNtl. COtlCll
AIR FORCE OISCllARGE RE\'IE\\ BOARD
lJ COMM,\ NO DR. EE WINC. JRD fl.O()R
- ORE\\ SAFB. ID 2076!-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)  Previous






AIR FORCE DISCHARGE R EVIEW BOAR D DECISIONAL RATlON ALE
Cf\SE NUl\IBER

FD-2014-00223

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a change to narrative reason and re-enlistment code

The applicant was offered a persona l appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FIN DING: The Board denies the req uest for change of nanati ve reason for discharge and change of re-enlistment code.

ISSUE: Applicant received an Honorable discharge - Personality Disorder

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts responsibili ty to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted . In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substant ial cred ible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the perti nent standards of equity and propriety.

Applicant contends that he should not be penal ized indefinitel y for a mistake made when he was young. The ORB recogni zed the applicant was 19 years of age when the discharge took place; however the applicant displayed significant symptoms of depression and anxiety that interfered with his traini ng and ability to
remain on active duty. The Board opined the applicant was the age of the vast majority of first-term members who were able to adapt and function in a mili tary environment. The OR B concluded that the characterization of the applicant's discharge was appropriate.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establ ish that an ineq ui ty or impropriety took place at the time of d ischarge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justi fy an upgrade of the reason for the discharge or the re-enlistment code.

CONCLUSION : The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the proced ural and substantive req uirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authori ty and the applicant was provided full administrati ve due process.

In view of the foregoi ng findi ngs, the Board further concl udes that there exists no lega l or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determi nes the discharge should remai n unchanged.

A ttachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00223

    Original file (FD 2014 00223.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforachangetonarrativereasonandre-enlistmentcode TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReview Board(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge. FIN DING: TheBoard denies the requestforchangeofnanative reasonfordischargeandchangeofre-enlistmentcode.ISSUE: Applicantreceivedan Honorabledischarge -...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00761

    Original file (FD-2014-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDiscipl inaryInfractionsTheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00719

    Original file (FD-2013-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof discharge toHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined and requeststhatthe review becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors leadingtothe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceiveda BadConductDischargeviaSpecialCourtMartial.The AirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilitytoexaminetheproprietyand equi...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00560

    Original file (FD-2014-00560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRS)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefconta insavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00031

    Original file (FD-2015-00031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FIN DING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractionsThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00666

    Original file (FD-2014-00666.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERA L: Theapplicant appeals foranupgradeofthedischarge to Honorable;a changetothereasonand authorityforthedischargeandtochangethere-enlistmentcode.TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard DRB,withcounsel,atAndrewsAFBonMarch 10, 2015. The followingwitnessalsotestifiedontheapplicant'sbehalf:(wife)(b) (6)Thefollowingadditionalexhibits weresubmittedatthe hearing:Exhibit #4: Applicant'sContentionsExhibit#5:CharacterreferencelettersThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00214

    Original file (FD 2014 00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00214

    Original file (FD-2014-00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...