Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00320
Original file (FD-2013-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE

AFSN/SSAN



TYPE GEN
x        PERSONAL APPEARANCE
RECORD REVIEW


NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL




MEMBER SITTING

HON      GEN

UOTHC    OTHER    DENY


X* X* X*
X*



ISSUES   A92.21 A92.0l




INDEX NUMBER
X*

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE    CASE NUMBER

28 Jan 2014      FD-2013-00320


Case heard via video-teleconference between Joint Base Andrews Maryland and Robins AFB Georgia Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
*Narrative Reason and Authority









TO:

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous


CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE    FD-2013-00320

GENERAL:         The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, via video teleconference between Joint Base Andrews Maryland and Robins AFB Georgia on 28 Jan 2014.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge and to change of reason and authority for discharge is denied.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for A Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline

Applicant contends that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service, however he does take full responsibility for his misconduct. The record indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, one Vacation, and two Letters of Reprimand. His misconduct included arrested for failure to pay court ordered probation fine, failed to go to scheduled appointment on time, failed to go to duty on time (2x) and failed to pay just debt. After a complete and thorough review of the records, the evidence provided by the applicant, and the applicant's testimony the DRB opined the applicant had ample opportunity to change his negative behavior. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well, volunteering in his community, and has a good job. However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.

The Board highly recommends that if the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate his post service conduct, that he should consider exercising his right to apply to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) for relief. Ifthe applicant chooses to exercise this right, he should be prepared to provide the AFBCMR with factual evidence of any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to the community.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00465

    Original file (FD-2013-00465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANTYPE GEN x I PERSONALAPPEARANCEI RECORD REVIEW fJ!. :k::: NAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATION YES NoxADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL:_ .MEMBERSITTINGHON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ I I I IX*+ISSUES A94.05 INDEXNUMBER A67.10 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00298

    Original file (FD-2010-00298.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The record indicates the applicant was discharged following his admission that he had smoked marijuana prior to entering the Air Force and concealed that information on his entrance documents.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00375

    Original file (FD-2008-00375.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN eee AB PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ee ‘VOTE om HON GEN UOTHC MEMBER SITTING | issues A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A 67.50 re EXHIBELS SUBSE 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 4 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE. a SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00337

    Original file (FD-2008-00337.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VORDOP THE BOARD GEN UOTHC OTHER X#4 Xt Xt X*+ ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94,06 A67.10 2 2 RXnBiTs SUBMITTED 10 THE BO: ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD [> (we [r fe ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00305

    Original file (FD-2008-00305.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL = AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFIWQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00305 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00027

    Original file (FD-2009-00027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE jp [ole le LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIBF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 13 3 Apr 2010 ED 2007-00027 * CHANGE RE CODE + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 Case heard i in n Washington, D. C. via...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00354

    Original file (FD-2008-00354.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request, * CHANGE RE CODE + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 Case heard via videoteleconference between Andrews AFB, Maryland and Robins AFB, Georgia on 13 April 2010. f SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, FE WING, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00182

    Original file (FD-2009-00182.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN = po | TYPE GEN |X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW el COUNSER © "| MAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No x MEMBER SITTING OTHER DENY x4 @ x* Ket xA+ ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 ie _ J —-— 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 7 4 |BRIEV OF PERSONNEL FILE _ COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00177

    Original file (FD-2009-00177.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied. Issue 2, Applicant contends the Board should take into account his post-service activities. However, the DRB opined that there was no relationship between the applicant’s illness and his misconduct and concluded the characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00568

    Original file (FD-2008-00568.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 350 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER ‘; AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00568 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. However, the day after charges were dismissed, the...