Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00375
Original file (FD-2008-00375.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
eee AB
PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 
 
 

ee ‘VOTE om
HON GEN UOTHC

 

 

MEMBER SITTING

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

| issues A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A 67.50 re EXHIBELS SUBSE
1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3

4

 

 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE.
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

 

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

 

15 Apr 2010 FD-2008-00375
> APPLICANTS ISSUE ANU THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL.RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED. ON THE.ATTACHED

: . canst Ce ee Se oe Q

Case heard in Washington, D.C. via video-teleconference with Robins AFB Georgia.

 

 

          
    

 

 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE R
es ee hein diy

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

a

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAF/MRBR ie Seen eal paring AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 38D FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pyy_99098.90375

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, via video
teleconference between Andrews AFB Maryland and Robins AFB Georgia on 15 Apr 2010.

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:
Exhibit #5: Applicant’s Contentions

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the
applicant received two Article 15s, two Letters of Reprimand, and two Letters of Counseling for misconduct.
The misconduct included failure to go, underage drinking, driving a personal vehicle on base while under
restriction, and drinking while on call. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the
applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded that the negative
aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The
characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00320

    Original file (FD-2013-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 ORDER APPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEF OF PERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARD ADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDING OFPERSONAL APPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENUMBER 28Jan2014 FD-2013-00320Caseheardviavideo-teleconferencebetweenJointBaseAndrewsMarylandandRobinsAFBGeorgia Adviseapplicantof thedecisionof theBoardandtherighttosubmitanapplicationtotheAFBCMR. Namesandvoteswillbemadeavailabletotheapplicantat...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00465

    Original file (FD-2013-00465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANTYPE GEN x I PERSONALAPPEARANCEI RECORD REVIEW fJ!. :k::: NAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATION YES NoxADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL:_ .MEMBERSITTINGHON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ I I I IX*+ISSUES A94.05 INDEXNUMBER A67.10 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00027

    Original file (FD-2009-00027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE jp [ole le LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIBF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 13 3 Apr 2010 ED 2007-00027 * CHANGE RE CODE + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 Case heard i in n Washington, D. C. via...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00298

    Original file (FD-2010-00298.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The record indicates the applicant was discharged following his admission that he had smoked marijuana prior to entering the Air Force and concealed that information on his entrance documents.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00354

    Original file (FD-2008-00354.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request, * CHANGE RE CODE + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 Case heard via videoteleconference between Andrews AFB, Maryland and Robins AFB, Georgia on 13 April 2010. f SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, FE WING, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00568

    Original file (FD-2008-00568.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 350 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER ‘; AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00568 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. However, the day after charges were dismissed, the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00177

    Original file (FD-2009-00177.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied. Issue 2, Applicant contends the Board should take into account his post-service activities. However, the DRB opined that there was no relationship between the applicant’s illness and his misconduct and concluded the characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00337

    Original file (FD-2008-00337.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VORDOP THE BOARD GEN UOTHC OTHER X#4 Xt Xt X*+ ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94,06 A67.10 2 2 RXnBiTs SUBMITTED 10 THE BO: ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD [> (we [r fe ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00182

    Original file (FD-2009-00182.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN = po | TYPE GEN |X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW el COUNSER © "| MAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No x MEMBER SITTING OTHER DENY x4 @ x* Ket xA+ ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 ie _ J —-— 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 7 4 |BRIEV OF PERSONNEL FILE _ COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00305

    Original file (FD-2008-00305.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL = AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFIWQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00305 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge,...