Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00182
Original file (FD-2009-00182.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

= po |

 

 

TYPE GEN |X PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

RECORD REVIEW

 

 

el COUNSER © "| MAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

   

 

 

 

 

 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YES No
x
MEMBER SITTING OTHER DENY
x4
@ x*
Ket
xA+
ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 ie _
J —-—
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 7
4 |BRIEV OF PERSONNEL FILE _
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAT, APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
16 Apr 2010 FD-2009-00182

 

*Reenlistment Code
+Narrative Reason
(@Secretarial Authority

10:

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78) 50-4742

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

 

FROM:

 

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00182

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge to Secretarial Authority, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, via video
teleconference between Andrews AFB Maryland and Robins AFB, Georgia on 16 Apr 2010.
The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:

Exhibit #5: Applicant’s Contentions
Exhibit #6: Response to Notification of Discharge
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, the change of reason and authority for
discharge, and change of reenlistment code.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by applicant substantiates an
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Issue 1: Applicant contends that he should not be penalized indefinitely for a mistake he made when he was
“young and dumb.” The applicant was discharged IAW AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2: A Pattern of
Misconduct, Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline. The applicant received an Article 15 for
failure to go, a Letter of Reprimand for failing to stop at a stop sign and driving on a suspended driver’s
license, and a second Article 15 for wrongfully transmitting pornographic material on a government
computer. The DRB recognized the applicant was 21 years of age when the discharge took place. However,
there is no evidence he did not know right from wrong. The Board opined the applicant was older than the
vast majority of first-term members who properly adhere to the Air Force’s standards of conduct. The DRB
concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

Issue 2: The applicant stated that he did not know that the reenlistment code he received would prevent his
reenlistment and had he known, he would have submitted a response to his discharge. The records show that
the applicant met with a defense counsel, acknowledged that he was being discharged for conduct prejudicial
to good order and discipline, with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. The applicant’s
defense counsel, Capt A, signed a memorandum stating that the applicant was fully counseled and advised of
his rights prior to waiving his right to submit a statement in response to the discharge. The DRB noted that
the applicant had submitted an application for review to the DRB in March 2003, requesting a “record
review” of his discharge based on his military personnel file. He did not submit any issues at that time.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00370

    Original file (FD2003-00370.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003~-00370 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1. discharge. (Atch 1.3) d. On 1 April 01, you operated a vehicle in a reckless manner and having been restricted to the limits of Edwards AFB, broke restriction, as evidenced by an AF Form 3070 (Article 15) dated 5 Jun 01.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00177

    Original file (FD-2009-00177.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied. Issue 2, Applicant contends the Board should take into account his post-service activities. However, the DRB opined that there was no relationship between the applicant’s illness and his misconduct and concluded the characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00464

    Original file (FD2003-00464.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) I GRADE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD TYPE GEN 6,?qmm X NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE YES No X A1C RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL INDEX NUMBER A67.90 ISSUES A94.11 A01.13 A94.05 A90.07 A90.09 I 1 2 3 4 HEARJNG DATE CASE NUMBER I I I EXHIBITS SUBMITIXD TO,TPIE BOARD I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00576

    Original file (FD-2008-00576.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    * Change Reason and Authority + Change Reenlistment Code a ais : oo SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL a AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 32RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00576 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00599

    Original file (FD-2013-00599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at AndrewsAFBon04 Apr2014.Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedat thehearing: Exhibit#5:CharacterreferenceletterTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00058

    Original file (FD2003-00058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0058 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. You did, at or near Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, on or about 3 May 2001, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: building 3010, Military Personnel Flight.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00575

    Original file (FD-2013-00575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORD REVIEWAFSN/SSANADDRESSAND ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL MEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHERDENY SAF/MRBR 550 CSTREETWEST,SUITE40RANDOLPHAFB,TX78150-4742SECRETARYOFTHEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCILAIRFORCEDISCHARGER.Evu:wllOARD1535COMMANDDR,EEWING,3RDFLOORANDREWSAFB,MD20762·7001 AFHQFORM0-2077,JAN00 (EF-V2) Previous AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDDECISIONALRATIONALE CASENUMBER FD-2013-00575GENERAL: The...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00467

    Original file (FD2004-00467.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2004-00467A (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) (REHEARING) 1. h. On or about 7 Jun 95 you reported to work late and on or about 19 Oct 95 you failed to complete a given task for which you received a Letter of Counseling on 23 Oct 95. : PO x20 20467 4 i, On or about 12 May 96 you was driving at an unreasonable rate of speed for which you received a traffic ticket and a Letter of Counseling on 8...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00255

    Original file (FD2006-00255.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You, who knew or should have known of your duties, on or about 20 Jul 03, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain from consuming alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 years, as it was your duty to do. For this failure to inform your superiors of the damage, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 27 Aug 02 (Attachment 9). For this dereliction of duty, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00497

    Original file (FD2005-00497.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES A94.53 A93.01 A67.10 INDEX NUMBER I E-mS I sm- I I TO THE BOARD 1 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER TAPE RECORDlNG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 25 Apr 2006 I FD-2005-00497 I I I I APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIOKAL RATlOKhL ARE DISCUSSED OK THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE...