Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00365
Original file (FD-2010-00365.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE BCD PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SIFTING UOTHC | OTHER DENY
x
Xx
x
Xx
Xx
: J
ISSUES A92.01 INDEX NUMBER A68.00 s st ee ae aS
1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2_| APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
24 May 2012 FD-2010-00365

 

 

ETS

"

   
    

is :
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 

 

 

SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00365

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a Bad Conduct Discharge

The Board finds that because the applicant did not receive an administrative discharge, thus his contention of
inequity is not applicable. The applicant received a Bad Conduct Discharge, a punitive discharge, as part of
his sentence resulting from a Special Court-Martial conviction. Under the provisions of Section 1553, 10
USC, the only basis for a change of a Bad Conduct discharge is clemency. The applicant presented evidence
which the DRB opined did not warrant granting clemency.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant’s punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is
appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of
clemency, for change of discharge.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00212

    Original file (FD2008-00212.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AB PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW: NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX X Xx x x ISSUES A91.05 INDEX NUMBER A68.00 ERAS Ate 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00113

    Original file (FD-2010-00113.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Upon review of the record, the Board was unable to find any documentation regarding the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00055

    Original file (FD-2009-00055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD REVIE' ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL UOTHC - T x ~ - - T x xX Xx t- Xx ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A93.01 A67.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER Of NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE 17 Jun 2010 CASE NUMBER FD-2009-00055 ee Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. The Board...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00159

    Original file (FD-2009-00159.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropricty that would justify a change of discharge. The...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00133

    Original file (FD-2009-00133.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW >) COUNSEL °.."''| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN “UO” THC OTHER X Xx x x x ISSUES A94 00 UNG A UVEEE A67 10 d ae a EXHIBITS SUBMITT ED TO THE THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093

    Original file (FD-2009-00093.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00317

    Original file (FD-2010-00317.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW . The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. Although the Board did not condone the applicant’s misconduct, they found that based on his entire record and personal circumstances at the time of discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00365

    Original file (FD-2008-00365.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN AMN RECORD REVIEW x INSED HA] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL OTHER HON GEN UOTHC ISSUES A94,353 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 | 7 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD - APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION Pm |e [to BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00348

    Original file (FD-2010-00348.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00389

    Original file (FD-2010-00389.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.