Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00175
Original file (FD-2009-00175.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

    
 

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 

 

    

TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE

RECORD REVIEW -

x

 

 

COENSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

  

MEMBER SITTING

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COLNSEL

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

xX
x
xX
x
a oa
1SSL A92.21 INDEX NUMBER AG7.30 “EXHIBITS SUBM dud
A92.35 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
A94.05

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00175

 

    
 

Case heard in Washington, 10.C.

application to the AFBCMR.

 

 

TO: FROM:
SAF/MRBR
$50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH APB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2)

APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE,

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 

 

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

ee | S| ee

 

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

 

 

iM

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, SRD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MI} 20762-7001

 

Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

FD-2009-00175

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds that neither the evidence of
record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change
of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant states that his discharge was inequitable because it focused on an isolated event and did
not take into account the good things he did while in the service. He believes that his honorable character is
further evidenced by his choice upon leaving the Air Force to continue to serve military members as a
civilian with honor and distinction. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented
by his performance reports, character letters, letters of recommendation and recognition, and other
_| accomplishments. The DRB also was very pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has thrived
working with TRICARE beneficiaries and veterans in the civilian sector. However, after a careful review of
the applicant’s personnel record, it found the scriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive
aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board found no inequity or impropriety in the course of the
hearing and concluded the misconduet of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examincr's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093

    Original file (FD-2009-00093.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00055

    Original file (FD-2009-00055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD REVIE' ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL UOTHC - T x ~ - - T x xX Xx t- Xx ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A93.01 A67.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER Of NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE 17 Jun 2010 CASE NUMBER FD-2009-00055 ee Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. The Board...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00001

    Original file (FD-2009-00001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A84.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A94,55 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL VILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 17 Dec 2009 FD-2009-00001 APPLICANT'S ISSUE-AND THE:BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE:ATTACHED AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530

    Original file (FD-2008-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00597

    Original file (FD-2008-00597.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ee 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 19 Feb 2010 FD-2008-00597 SSSUE AND a cae Case heard i in Washington, D.C, FORGE PGES. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00580

    Original file (FD-2008-00580.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00544

    Original file (FD-2008-00544.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL "VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x x x ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A01.00 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00348

    Original file (FD-2010-00348.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00535

    Original file (FD-2008-00535.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1438 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AMFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00535 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00599

    Original file (FD-2008-00599.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON COL ROBERT J. MACDONALD x WANDA R. LANGLEY x LT COL JIMMIE J. DRUMMOND Xx MSGT TERRY S. CLARK xX LT COL KENNETH SHARRETT x ISSUES 493.91 INDEXNUMBER 4 co gy "EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD - A94,55 A66.00 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 \APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...