Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00566
Original file (FD-2008-00566.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

      
 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 

    
 

   

 

   

 

po AB
TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW
_ COUNSEL.) NAME OF COUNSEL. AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

coo VOTE OF THE BOARD | . adnan
MEMRED CITTING ; an ec
HON GEN UOTHC DENY
xX
x
xX
x
x
ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 EXHIB(ITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE oe
3. |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEI. FILE ee
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
13 Jan 2010 FD-2008-00566

 

 

 

APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE,

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

en 7

TO: FROM:
SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
§50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00566

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable because “his commander or superiors did not offer or
recommend my attending any substance abuse programs” after he had his second alcohol related incident.

The applicant was discharged JAW AFI 3603208, paragraph 5.49 for Misconduct: Minor Disciplinary
Infractions with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant received nonjudicial
punishment (NJP) in September 2005 while stationed in Germany for driving while drunk (DUD). In
October 2006, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to pay a just debt. While stationed at
Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, the applicant received his second NJP in February 2007 for being DUI and for
being absent without leave. The applicant contends that while he was ordered into substance abuse
treatment after his first DUI, his superiors did not offer substance abuse counseling after his second DUI.

AFI 44-121, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment (ADAPT) Program, paragraph 3.8.1 states
that commanders shall refer all service members for assessment when substance abuse is suspected to be a
contributing factor in any incident, such as DUI. While commanders should comply with this provision in
order to assist in the assessment of the member, the misconduct noted in the applicant’s record was legally
sufficient to support a discharge with a general service characterization. Furthermore, while the applicant
contends that he was not referred to ADAPT, the Board relied on the presumption of regularity with regard
to the applicant’s contention.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the

discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determined the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00437

    Original file (FD-2010-00437.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Failure in the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Program (ADAPT) Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was based on two isolated and immature mistakes in sixteen months of service. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00217

    Original file (FD2008-00217.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN AMN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW : | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x Xx x x ISSUES A92.35 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 - ATUBTES SUB : 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2007-00404

    Original file (FD2007-00404.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN = TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Bea oe MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER | DENY — xX x x x x 7 =e ISSUES A92.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee : E t 94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00262

    Original file (FD-2010-00262.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    i | Poof GEE J x i ee ee poo oG oF bE dG | i oy | | i of 4 | i ; ; i i ee ee | i 4 “ ee | HE | Poy od | rf - Po bod ot dg | ISSUES ‘493.19 INDEX NUMBER rn 67.10 oe a a is f A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.01 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 29 Mar 2012...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00348

    Original file (FD-2010-00348.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00439

    Original file (FD-2010-00439.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No X MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER DENY xX xX x x : x ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 A92.35 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A92.03 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00218

    Original file (FD2008-00218.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL - MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC ~ DENY x xX x x L ___| _| | Xx IssvES 95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 sana 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00155

    Original file (FD2008-00155.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Pl AB a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ‘VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY x x x xX xX _ EXHIBITS SUBMITTED:TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00225

    Original file (FD2008-00225.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 J|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2009 FD-2008-00225 APPLICANT’S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. ISSUE: Applicant submitted no issues and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530

    Original file (FD-2008-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...