Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00436
Original file (FD-2008-00436.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
Pe AMIN pe
TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
“COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION | ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL.
~ rae P VOTEOR THE BOARD. it
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER | DENY
x
x
x
x
x
ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 EXHIBITS SURMITTED TO THE BOARD... . _
1] JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIFF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE [EARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER,
24 Jun 2010 FD-2008-00436

 

 

 

APPLICANT GIRSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAT RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

aS se z Ae BN

Case heard in Washington, D.C,

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

Las DIVER ; MA OT Lisl
TO; FROM:
SAF/MRBR. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCHL
ey dy oransaafin nen AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFR, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00404

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUES:

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable bccause it was too harsh. He contends he did have some
problems adapting to the military lifestyle but yet he was told he was a good airman. The records indicated
the applicant received an Article 15, a Vacation, and nine Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. His
misconduct included engaging in a water fight and a verbal altercation with another airman, removing M9
pistol from its holster to pose for a picture in full public view, failing to stay awake on post (3x), making a
false official statement, theft of hand gun, failure to go (4x), and involvement in a verbal altercation and
communication a threat. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample

opportunities to change his negative behavior. ‘The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the
applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career... The
characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00338_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00338_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEAFSN/SSANADDRESS ANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOVNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHERxxA67.90 A93.07 lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPFARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGl:f.EARJNGDATE CASENVMBER19Juf2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00598

    Original file (FD-2008-00598.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFSN/SSAN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING et Se Po SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCIIARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 (EF-V2)} Previous CASE NUMBER |...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00293

    Original file (FD-2010-00293.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN [|X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY t i i i { i Poi ot bd Ed dg x Pe bE | i A é 4 5 i : ; * byork dG bg - i \ { j i i i } PoE : : i : i : ; X*+ pod EE GE pot | Po rtf EG] x Pope i | é j j ee ee | hoe clonane A92.35 A67.10 ae cur sence A93.01 1 |ORDER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00220

    Original file (FD-2013-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEForPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCE TAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENU!\:IBER12May2014 FD-2013-00220CaseheardinWashington,D.C.Adviseapplicantofthedecisionof theBoardandthe righttosubmitanapplicationtotheAFBCMR. TO•SAF/MRBR550CSTREET WEST,SUITE40 RANDOLPHAFB,TX78150-4742 SECRETARYOF THEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCIL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00535

    Original file (FD-2008-00535.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1438 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AMFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00535 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093

    Original file (FD-2009-00093.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00389

    Original file (FD-2010-00389.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00455

    Original file (FD-2008-00455.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1536 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00455 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for discharge. ISSUE: Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00583

    Original file (FD-2008-00583.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW ‘ | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL eee Pe / | . *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL a ae _ AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00049

    Original file (FD2003-00049.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (EF-V2) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2003-00049 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable to change the reason and authority for the discharge. Applicant further requests that the reason for his discharge be changed to “expiration of term of service.” The records indicated the applicant received four Letters of Reprimand, three Letters of Counseling, had an Unfavorable Information File, and was found guilty at Special...