Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00598
Original file (FD-2008-00598.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER

A94.05 A67.10

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

02 Mar 2010

     

 

FD-2008-00598

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

application to the AFBCMR.

aT a ---4-- --1tP Ls An neen il

   

SAF/MRBR
350 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 
 
  

| PERSONAL APPEARANCE x

 

  

 

     
   

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

chia ta the «nylicant at the applicant’s request.

  

 

  
 

AFSN/SSAN

 
 

RECORD REVIEW

  

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

   
     
   
    
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

[LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

et Se

Po

 

  
 
    
 

 

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCIIARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

(EF-V2)} Previous
CASE NUMBER

| AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp_2998-00598

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

The applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. In support of his contention, the
applicant noted that three of the incidents that were used as the basis for his discharge occurred in the same
year and that he had been in the Air Force for three years before he got into trouble. The applicant enlisted
on 23 March 2004. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 on 19 June 2007, a Vacation
Action on 13 November 2007, a Letter of Reprimand on 5 February 2007, and a Record of Individual
Counseling on 20 December 2006. His misconduct included using disrespectful language toward two
different non-commissioned officers; assaulting a senior airman by pushing him and disorderly conduct;
urinating in public, failing to obey a lawful order, and disrespect and disregard for authority; and verbal and
written harassment of a fellow airman. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the
applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded that the negative
aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The
Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of
the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00598

    Original file (FD-2012-00598.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANPERSONALAPPEARANCERECORDREVIEWNAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELUOTHC OTHER DENY A94.551ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITS SUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARING DATE CASENUMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00471

    Original file (FD2008-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL The American Legion . ~ see ee ees MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ L — _ | —__| [ xt X*t+ X*+ ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION (a BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00465

    Original file (FD-2008-00465.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN a ‘ x PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW 0 NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL nes [we Px] | Donte Marshal, Inc 00 HON : UOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUES A92.21 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 . | A94,05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE (3. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2007-00404

    Original file (FD2007-00404.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN = TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Bea oe MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER | DENY — xX x x x x 7 =e ISSUES A92.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee : E t 94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00049

    Original file (FD-2009-00049.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ , ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ~ | " ONGTE OF THE BOARD = ed Lai sae ae fs ay HON GEN | UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x ISSUES A93.23 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 “EXBIBITS SUBMIT EED TO THE BOARD A92,35 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A94.05 2_ [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00181

    Original file (FD2008-00181.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN atc |__| x RECORD REVIEW ;] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION a ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING OTHER DENY | x Xx x x Xx ISSUES 45 99 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 HEB A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 13 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00143

    Original file (FD-2009-00143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A94,05 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION OR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION alee [=] 5 {BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE 24 Jun 2010 ¥D-2009-001 43 PAP RUIC ANTS [S80 AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATION ALE ARE DISCUSSED ON JHEATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONALRATIONAEB Geos: CASE NUMBER Case heard in Washington,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00429_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00429_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbytheapplicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD 2013 00189

    Original file (FD 2013 00189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARlNGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FfflSTMlDOLE INITIAL)PERSONAL APPEARANCE COIJNSt:L NAME OFCOUNSELANDOR ORGANIZATION 1 1 YES No xGRAOE AFSN/SSAN RECORDREVIEWADORESSANOORORGANIMTIONOFCOUNSEL VOTE OFTHEROAROMEMBER SITTING HON UOTllCOTHER DENY ISSLESA94.JlINDEX NUMBERA67.10EX1H8ITS SUBMITTEDTO THEBOARDORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETrEROF NOTlrJCATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'S...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00189

    Original file (FD-2013-00189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARlNGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FfflSTMlDOLE INITIAL)PERSONAL APPEARANCE COIJNSt:L NAME OFCOUNSELANDOR ORGANIZATION 1 1 YES No xGRAOE AFSN/SSAN RECORDREVIEWADORESSANOORORGANIMTIONOFCOUNSEL VOTE OFTHEROAROMEMBER SITTING HON UOTllCOTHER DENY ISSLESA94.JlINDEX NUMBERA67.10EX1H8ITS SUBMITTEDTO THEBOARDORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETrEROF NOTlrJCATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'S...