Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00406
Original file (FD2005-00406.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

I 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIHS'I' MIDDLE INITIAL) 

I: -.-..-.-..-.-....-....~...., 
 TYPE  HON 
1 

( 
] NAME OF COUNSEL  ANI3OR ORGANIZATION 

I 

""EL 

I 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

GR4DE 

SRA 
I 

I 

X

I

I 

 

RECORDREVIEW 

ADDRESS AND OR ORCANILATION OF COIJNSEL 

1 

I 

I 

r 9 9 u e s  

A95.00 

INDEX NUMBER 

A49.00 

EXHIBIT& & 

1 

1 

1 
1 

1 

I 

I  ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 

I 
2  1  APPLICATION FOII IIEVlEW OF DISCHARGE 
3 
4 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 
COUNSEL'S  RELEASE TO T H E  BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT 'I'IME OF 
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

TAPE IIECORDING OF PERSONAL  AI'PFAKANCE  HE 

HEARING DATE 

1  22 Sep 2006 

CASE NUMBER 

/  FD-2005-00406 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

APPLICANT'S  ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S  DECISIONAL R4TIONAl. ARE DISCCSSED Oh i'HL  ATTACHED AIR  FORCE UISCHAKGE REVIEW ROhRD D6CISIONAL RATIONALE 

Case heard in Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withiwithout counsel, and the right to submit an 
application to the AFBCMR 

I  ' 
I  - _  
1 
1 

L . - . . - . - . . . . - . . . . - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - y * - - - - - , 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :  

n  A  7. ,.,.., -- 

JAi+lMKDK 
550 C STREET WEST, SU1'I.E 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 

-INDORSEMENT 

I  cnn,,. 

1  . ..l"l.' 
I 

SECRETARY O F  THE AIR  FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 
1535 COMMAND DR, El? WINC.3RD  FLOOR 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 

DATE:  Y/25/2(Wb 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NIJMBER 

FD-2005-00406 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for discharge. 

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to 
exercise this right. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Change of reason and authority for discharge is denied. 

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an 
inequity or impropriety that would justify  a change of discharge. 

ISSUE: 

Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed to "Failure to 
progress in OJT" or "For the Convenience of the Government."  Applicant concludes that he should not be 
labeled with "Unsatisfactory  Performance" making him ineligible for education benefits.  The DRB opined 
that the reason for discharge was Unsatisfactory Performance which is in accordance with AFT  36-3208, 
paragraph 5.26.3, Failure to progress in on-the-job training (OJT).  This reason would include individuals 
who fail to upgrade in a timely manner or as is in his case failed to pass the Career Development Course 
(CDC) exam and failed the CDC exam twice.  An involuntary discharge for the Convenience of the 
Government would only be appropriate when discharge would serve the best interests of the Air Force and 
the discharge for cause is not warranted.  The Board concluded the reason for the discharge received by thc 
applicant was found to be appropriate. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the 
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB, MD 

( Former SrA)  ( HGH SrA) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW: 

Appl rec'd an HONORABLE Disch from Hickam AFB, HI on 08 Aug 2005 UP AFT  36-3208, para 
5.26.2 (Unsatisfactory Performance).. Appeals for Change of Reason for Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a.  DOB: 10 Jul  1980  Enlmt Age: 21  11/12  Disch Age: 25 0112  Educ: High School 

AFQT:  A-43  E-39  G-47  M-39  DAS: 08 Apr 2003 
PAFSC:  4Y03 1 - Dental Assistant Apprentice 

b.  Prior Sv:  17 Jun 02 -  18 Nov 02 (5 months 2 days) (Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enld as A 1 C on  19 Nov 2002 for 4 Years.  Svd:  2 yrs 8 months 20 days, all AMS. 

b. Grade Status: 

SrA - 19 Mar 05 

c. Time Lost: 

None. 

d. Art  15's: 

None 

e. Additional: 

f. Court Martial: 

g. Record of SV: 

Memorandum For 15 ADSICC, Undated - Failed End of Course Exam twice. 
Test Score #1: 54%.  Test Score #2: 55%. 
None. 

1 9 Nov 02 - 1 5 Apr 04  Hickarn AFB  5  (HAF Dir) 
16 Apr 04  - 15 Apr 05  Hickarn AFB  3 (Annual) REF 

h. Awards and Decs:  AFTR, NDSM, GWOTSM, AFOUA, AFOSLTR, SAEMR. 

i. Statement of Sv: 

TMS:  3 years  1 months 22 days 
TAMS:  2 years 8 months 20 days 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: 

ISSUE 1 : Narrative Reason for Separation that was used is incorrect.  Using the current reason 
will not permit me to get my MGI Bill of which I feel I am entitled to.  Over the course of one 
year, $100 per month was deducted from my pay for this entitlement. 

FD-2005-00404 

ATCH 

1. DD Form 214. 
2.  AF Form 100. 
3.  VA Benefits Decision, 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

PACIFIC AIR FORCES 

MEMORANDUM FOR SrA ; 

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

m

,

 

FROM:  15 ADSICC 

SUBJECT:  Notification Memorandum 

1.  I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Unsatisfactory 
Performance, specifically, failure to progress in on-the-job training (OJT).  The authority for this 
action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, paragraph, 5.26.3.  If my recommendation is 
approved, your service can be characterized as honorable or general.  I am recommending that 
your service be characterized as Honorable. 

2.  My reasons for this action are: 

a.  On or about 1 Jul04, you tested for your Career Development Course, in which your final 

score was S4%,  resulting in failure. 

b.  On or about 6 Jan 05, you tested a second time on your Career Development Course, in 

which your final score was 55%,  resulting in failure. 

3.  Copies of documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this 
recommendation are attached.  The commander exercising Special Court-Martial jurisdiction or 
higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained by the Air Force.  The 
commander will also decide how your service will be characterized.  If you are discharged, you 
will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and can be denied enlistment in any 
component of the United States Armed Forces.  Additionally, any special pay, bonus, or 
education assistance offered by the Armed Forces may be subject to recoupment. 

4.  You have the right to 
I have made an 
Counsel, 
expense. 

1 

at Area Defense 

5.  You have the right to submit statements on your own behalf.  Any stateme  ts yo  want the 
separation authority to consider must reach me within 3 duty days, or by 
unless 
you request and receive an extension for good cause'shown.  I will forward any statements to the 
separation authority. 

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf, your failure to do so 
will constitute a waiver of this privilege. 

7.  You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You will report to Physical Exams at 
the  1 5 ~  Medical Group on  $7 p r g  at 
hours for your examination. 

hours at Primary Care at  t 4 5 

1 L'l5 

8.  You must report to Separations, in uniform, on  $fr$.da5 
located in the Military Personnel Flight, at 449-0658.  During this appointment you will 
surrender your (including family members) active duty ID card(s), and temporary ID(s) will be 
issued. 

at  /I40 hours.  Separations is 

9.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974.  A 
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use through your Commander's Support Staff. 

10.  Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately. 

: . . . - . - . - . . . . . . . . - . - - - - - - - - - p - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - - - - '  

Commander, 1 5th Aeromedical Dental Squadron 

8 Attachments: 
1.  Student History Query 
2.  AF Form 623a 
3.  CDC Course Examination Failure assessment 
4.  EPRs 
5.  Memo fiom SSgti 
6.  Memo fiom TSgti 
7.  ~cknowled~ernelif ?Ed ~ i ~ $ t '  
8, Recoupment statement 

'df7Vo:tification 

------------------------. 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00003

    Original file (FD01-00003.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed. Change the Reason and Authority for Disch. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure Will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00532

    Original file (FD2003-00532.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed. The Board concluded the reason for the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate. Now on to some of the issues concerning why I failed to adequately study the CDC's.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00386

    Original file (FD2006-00386.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 1 Mar 04 for 4 years. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to progress in on-the-job training according to AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation ofAirmen, under the provisions of paragraph 5.26.3. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00394

    Original file (FD2005-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right. Applicant contends during his military career, he made some bad decisions, he was young and dumb and didn't have a family yet, and hc now has a family and purpose, currently works for Social Security, and has a career and wants to continue to grow. LOR, 14 NOV 95 - Financial irresponsibility.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00463

    Original file (FD2005-00463.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR / Naines and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. ISSUE: Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed and also requested to have his reenlistment code changed to be eligible for reenlistment into the United States Air Force. The commander exercising...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00227

    Original file (FD2005-00227.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the applicant did receive an Honorable discharge, the Board encourages the applicant to reapply for her GI Bill benefits and show the VA that-her reason and authority for discharge were for failure to pass her CDC. Though not used as a basis for your discharge, the following actions will be reviewed by the sep'aration authority: :. Although the LOR states the action was taken for the second CDC failure, it is obvious due to the date of the LOR the action was taken for the first...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00306

    Original file (FD2005-00306.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Unsatisfactory Duty Performance: Failure to progress in on-the-job training (OJT). The separation authority will make the findings and recommendations required under 10 U.S.C. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00364

    Original file (FD2005-00364.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FI.OOR ANDREW$ AFB, M D 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. Recommend to the respondent's MAJCOM that she be cross trained and retained in the Air Force or, c. Discharge the respondent based on...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0279

    Original file (FD2002-0279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Digcharge to Reason and Authority for Discharge and Separation code (SPD) Issue 1: I understand that I failed to pass my career development course (CDC), however the separation code on my DD 214 is JHJ, Unsatisfactory Job Performance, which I feel misrepresents why I was separated. In this case, the Respondent’s commander has recommended he receive an honorable discharge. 4, Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00346

    Original file (FD2005-00346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant received two Letters of Reprimand for being derelict in performance of duties and failure to go to appointed place of duty. (atch 2) (2) On or about 15 October 1997, you were derelict in the performance of your duties in that you failed to prepare yourself for duty at the required time. (atch 7) (7) On or about 4 June 1997, you were derelict in the performance of your duties in that you failed to prepare yourself for duty at the required time.