Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00003
Original file (FD01-00003.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 
FD-0 1-00003 

I 

= 

~- 

-_ 

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors l e a d i w o  the discharge. 

- 

FINDINGS:  Change of reason for discharge and change of RE code are denied. 

The Board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or 
impropriety which would justify a change of discharge. 

_ _  

The applicant’s issue is listed in the attached brief. 

Issue.  Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed.  Applicant 
concludes that he should not be  labeled with “Unsatisfactory Performance.”  The DRB opined that the reason 
for discharge was Unsatisfactory Performance which is  in  accordance with  AFI  36-3208, paragraph  5.26.3, 
Failure to progress in on-the-job training (OJT).  This reason would include individuals who fail to upgrade in a 
timely  manner  or as is in his case failed to pass the Career Development Course (CDC) 2S051A  exam and 
failed the CDC exam twice. The Board concluded the reason for the discharge and the RE code received by the 
applicant were found to be appropriate. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of  the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

- 

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
change of reason for discharge and change of RE code, thus the applicant’s discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner’s Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB,  MD 

FD-01-00003 

(Former SRA)  MISSING DOCUMENTS - 

- 

- 

- 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd  a HON Disch fr USAF 99/09/08 UP  AFI 36-3208, 
para 5.26.3  (Unsatisfactory Performance). 
Change the Reason and Authority for Disch. 

Appeals for RE Code Change and to 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 77/08/02.  Enlmt Age: 18 4/12.  Disch Age: 22 1/12. Educ:HS  DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-23,  E- 72,  G-50,  M-70. PAFSC: 2S031 -  Supply Management 
Apprentice. DAS: 98/08/11. 

b.  Prior Sv: AFRes 95/12/08 -  96/02/27 (2 months 20 days)(Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

- 

6 Mo  ll.Das, all AMs. 

a.  Enld as AB 96/02/28 for 9 yrs.  Ext: 98/12/01 for 8  months.  Svd: 3  Yrs 

b. 

C. 

d. 

% 

e. 

f. 

9. 

Grade Status:  SRA  -  99/02/28 
A1C -  97/06/28 
AMN -  (EPR  Indicates) : 96/02/28-97/10/27 

Time Lost:  none. 

- 

- 

Art 15's:  (1) 97/12/19, Travis AFB, CA -  ArtTcle 92.  You, did, o/a 27 
Nov 97, violate a lawful regulation, to wit: para 
6.1.6., AFI 33-129, dated-l Jan 97, by wrongfully using 
an internet chat room which was not authorized and was 
not for official purposes.  Rdn to Amn  (susp til 18 Jun 
981, and forfeiture of  $100.00 pay.  [No appeal) 
(No mitigation) 

- 

Additional: EOC, 09 DEC 98 -  End of Course Examination Failure. 
EOC, 02 MAR 99 -  End of Course Examination Failure. 

.. 

- 

CM:  none. 
Record of SV: 96/02/28  9 7 f - W 2 7 - - - T f a v i s   AFB  4 

97/10/28  98/06/20  Travis AFB  4  (CRO) 
98/06/21  98/11/18  Kunsan AB  4  (CRO) 
98/11/19  99/08/04  Kunsan AB  2  (Cmdr Dir) 

(Discharged from Offutt AFB) 

- 

* A  
- 

(Initial)-- . 

h. 

Awards &  Decs:  AFTR, AFOUA, AFGCM, AFOSSTR. 

b 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS:  (3) Yrs  (9 
( 3 )  Yrs  (6 

TAMS: 

Mos  (1) Das 
Mos  (11) Das 

E’DO1-00003 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 00/04/26. 

(Change-RE Csde and Change the Reason and Authority f o r   Dischaxe) 
Issue 1:  Reentry code should be 4-6 &  not 2c!  Please change ASAP as  ----- 

- 

- 

is enlisting in the Navy. 

-- 

-  -- 

~ 

- 

ATCH 
1.  Authorization For Release of  Confidential Information. 
2.  Senatorial Correspondence. 
3 .   AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings. 
4 .   DD Form 214. 
5. SAF/MIBR Correspondence. 

_ _  

00/12/28/ia 

. 

.

.

 

Bi 

ef, 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

8TH FIGHTER WING (PACAF) 

APO AP 96264-2090 

MEMOMNDUJI  FOR 
FROM:  8 S u P S / E  
SUBJECT:  Notification Memorandum 

, 

17 August 1999 

__ 

1.  I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Unsatisfactory 
Performance, specifically, failing to progress in on-the-job training (OJT).  The authority for the 
action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5,15.26.3. If my recommendation is 
approved, your service will be characterized as Honorable or General.  I am recommending that 
your service be characterized as Honorable. 

2.  My reasons for this action are that you failed to progress in your OJT: 

a.  On 9 December 1998, you failed to meet the minimum passing score of 65% on your 

2S05 1 A Career Development Course (CDC) end of course examination.  (Atch 2) 

- 

b.  On 2 March 1999, for the second time, you failed to meet the minimum passing score 

of 65% on your 2S05 1A CDC end of course examination.  (Atch 2) 

3.  Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this 
recommendation are attached.  The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher 
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, and, if you are 
discharged, how your service will be characterized.  If you are discharged, you will be ineligible 
for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or educational assistance funds may 
be subject to recoupment. 
4. You have the right to consult counsel.  Milit 
I have made an appointment for you to consul 
1 7  
expense. 

hrs.  You may consult civilian counsel at your own 

1999 at  1300 

5.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.  Any statements you want the 
separati0.n  authority to consider must reach me by 
you request and receive an extension for good cause shown.  I will send your matters to’fhe 
separation authority. 

, (3 duty days) unless 

73 

gg 

- 

, 

- 

.I#&-. 

6 

6.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure Will 
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

--  -  __ 

7.  You have been scheduled for a medical examination.  You must report to the Medical Group 
Physical Examinations section, Kunsan AB, ROK at 1300-1500 hrs on  17  Aug 
1999. 
Take the attached medical clearance letter with you to the appointment. 

I 

Attaquez et Conquerez 

8.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A 
copy of AFI 36-3208, is available for your use at the Area Defense Counsel’s office. 

Attachments: 
1.  Acknowledgment of Receipt of Notification Memorandum 
2.  Individual Training Record, 46 pgs 
3.  Enlisted Performance Reports 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0377

    Original file (FD2002-0377.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp9097-00 977 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a change to the character of discharge from general to ho The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), at Andrews Air Hibrce Base, Maryland, on April 1, 2003. h DEPA..TMENT OF THE AIR FORCE | PACIFIC AIR FORCES 18 May 99 MEMORANDUM FOR 18 WG/CC FROM: 18 WG/JA SUBJECT: Legal Review - Administrative Discharge - i, 18 CS (PACAP), Kadena AB,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0369

    Original file (FD2002-0369.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI,) GRADE AFSNISSAN &I A l C TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL COUNSEL YES I NO X MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY VOTE OF THE BOARD ISSUES A93.09 JNDEX NlJMlER A49.00 HEARING DATE 26 FEB 03 CASE NUMBER FD2002-0369 X I I EXHIBITS SUBMITITD TO THE BOARD I I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00364

    Original file (FD2005-00364.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FI.OOR ANDREW$ AFB, M D 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. Recommend to the respondent's MAJCOM that she be cross trained and retained in the Air Force or, c. Discharge the respondent based on...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0346

    Original file (FD2002-0346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |p 092-0346 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Basis for Action: The Commander, 78" Fighter Squadron, has recommended that qian alia: separated from the service with a general discharge for failure to progress in on-the- job training (OJT), under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section E, paragraph 5.26.3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00400

    Original file (FD2003-00400.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons provided in her discharge notification letter, dated 19 October 1999, were that on five separate occasions the applicant failed her career development course (CDC) examinations. The applicant's commander initially recommended a general discharge, but after receiving an oral and written response from the applicant, he amended the discharge notification on 27 October 1999, to recommend an honorable discharge. (Atch 1-3) d. On 17 December 1997, Air Education and Training Command...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0334

    Original file (FD2002-0334.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SIGNATURE OF RECORDER INDEX NUMBER A94.05 A49.00 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 7 JAN 03 FD2002-0334 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to mei rs) mL OK APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ee TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING AIR FORCE DISCHARGE'RE VIEW BOARD...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00532

    Original file (FD2003-00532.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed. The Board concluded the reason for the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate. Now on to some of the issues concerning why I failed to adequately study the CDC's.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0027

    Original file (FD2002-0027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD62-0027 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a Change in Reason and Authority for Discharge. The records indicated the applicant failed his CDC Course exam twice and was honorable discharged. RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated above, I recommend the respondent be discharged from the United States Air Force under AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section E, paragraph 5.26.3, with an honorable discharge, without P&R.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0262

    Original file (FD2002-0262.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0262 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and for a change of the reason for discharge to unsatisfactory performance. Issue 1, Applicant contends that before she was separated from the Air Force, she was told that if she failed her CDC test, she would be given an honorable discharge. | am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for unsatisfactory duty performance —...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0279

    Original file (FD2002-0279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Digcharge to Reason and Authority for Discharge and Separation code (SPD) Issue 1: I understand that I failed to pass my career development course (CDC), however the separation code on my DD 214 is JHJ, Unsatisfactory Job Performance, which I feel misrepresents why I was separated. In this case, the Respondent’s commander has recommended he receive an honorable discharge. 4, Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.