NAME. OF SERVICF MFMRFR I1 AST FlHC I' Mll)nl F INITIAL)
G W D F
1
- -.
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
PERSONAL APPEAIIANCE
-
-. .-
. .,
- .. . ..
.- .
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I
. - . . . . . ,
MEMBER SITTING
-.
DENY
....
t- *
ISSIIES
A92.02
A02.15
A94.07
HEARING DATE
CASF NllhlBER
-- - .-
2
3
4
EXHIBITS SUBMl't"l'ED TO THE BOARD
&* *-
ORDER APPOINTMG THE BOAKD
APPLICATION FOR RkVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTFR O F NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COlJNShL'S RELEASk 'I 0 TIIE BOARD
AL)DITIC)NAL E X I I I B I T S ~ U B M I ~ I
IJERSONAL APIit-ARANCE
IEL) A ~ T I M E ot
IAI'E KCCORDIN(; O F PERSONAI, APPEARANC'F
-
- -
13 Fcb 2006
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S I1FC ISlONAL RATIONAL ARE DlSClJSSED ON TIE A I'IArHEU AIR FORCE DISCHAKOE REVIEW BOARD l3tCISIONAL RATI0NAL.E
FD-2005-00262
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFRCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at tile applicant's request.
+ RE Code
* Reason and Authority
/'
n.- ,.---
,l,-.d,,,7r.~
, -.,. .. I \
J
1NDOKSEMENT
I
.-
- - .- - --
SAFIMKBK
550 C STRkk I WEST, SUITE 40
RANIIOLPI I AFB TX 78 150-4742
I
- -
DATE: 2/15/2OU6
- -
-
SL(KETARY O F T H E AIR FORCL PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, LE WING, 3 R D FlOOR
ANnREWS APB, M D 10762-7002
I
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, .IAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE m V 1 E W BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2005-00262
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable general and to change the reason
and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of
reenlistment code are denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUES:
1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because he was falsely accused of rape. The records
indicated the applicant received three Letters of Reprimand and two Letters of Counseling for misconduct.
The misconduct included lost government identification card, two counts of breaking Phase 1, lying to a
commissioned officer, dereliction of duty, failure to go and unauthorized absence from duty section. The
DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his
negative behavior. The records also indicated that the applicant had court martial charges preferred for rape.
The applicant asked to be discharged in lieu of trial by court martial. The Board concluded the misconduct
was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the
discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
2. Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service.
The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance report and other
accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the
applicant's duty performance. The majority of Board members concluded the discharge was appropriate for
the reasons which were the basis for this case.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVXEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, Mn
(Former A1C)
(HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: A p p l rec'd a UOTH Disch fr Sheppard AFB, TX on 1 2 A p r
0 5 UP A F I 3 6 - 3 2 0 8 , Chapter 4 (Triable by Court Martial). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 1 Nov 8 5 . Enlmt Age: 17 9/12. Disch Age: 19 5/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-23, E-19, G - 5 5 , M - 2 8 . PAFSC: 4NOll - Aerospace Medical Services
Helper. DAS: 23 Feb 0 4 .
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 2 6 A u g 0 3 - 2 8 Dec 0 3 ( 4 months 3 days)(Xnactive).
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVXEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 29 Dec 0 3 for 6 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 0 3 Mo 15 D a s , all AMS
b . Grade S t a t u s : A1C - 13 Feb 0 4
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e . Additional: LOR, 03 MAR 05 - Two counts of breaking phase 1 and 1 count
of lying to a commissioned officer.
LOR, 1 4 FEB 0 5 - Dereliction of duty and 2 phase
LOC, 13 JAN 05 - Failure to go.
LOR, 01 OCT 0 4 - Unauthorized absence from duty section for
violations.
LOC, 1 9 FEB 0 4 - L o s t I D card.
4 hours and 25 minutes.
f . CM: None.
g. Record of SV: None.
h . A w a r d s & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, GWOTS.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs ( 0 7 ) M O s (18) D a s
TAMS: ( 0 1 ) Yrs ( 0 3 ) Mos ( 1 5 ) Das
4 . B A S I S ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 2 9 3 ) dtd 2 3 Jun 0 5 .
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge)
APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
(Please read instructions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE complering this application.)
I OMBNo. 07040004
Form Approved
Expires Aug 3 1, 2006
I
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 mdnutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sou;ces,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aswct of this collection
of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense. Executive Services and Communications Directorate (070eM)041. Respondents should be
aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid
OM8 control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION. RFTURN COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON
BACK OF THIS PAGE.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
AUTHORITY: 10 U.S.C. 1553; E.O. 9397.
PRINCIPAL PURPOSEIS): To apply for a change in the characterization or reason for rn~litary discharge issued t o an individual.
ROUTINE USE(S): None.
DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure to provide identifying information may impede processing of this application. The request for
Social Security Number is strictly to assure proper identification of the individual and appropriate records.
1. APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be review&.
a. BRANCH OF SERVICE lX one) I
I ARMY
-..
- 2. L,. - -. ,.--. .-..-- -.. --. -,-, .,..
E- 2
-
RECEIVED fX one] 5. BOARD ACTION REQUESTED IX one1
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.
NAVY
- I C. GRADERANK AT DISCHARGE
I d. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
b. NAME 11 nrr F~mt M;dd/e /rritia/l
MARINE CORPS
COAST GUARD
AIR FORCE
,. ,,,,,,,,.,,
-- -- --
(YYYYMMDD) (If date is more than 15 years
,,,,ACTERIZATION
,,
HONORABLE
GENERAUUNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
BAD CONDUCT (Specral court-marrial only)
UNCHARACTERIZED
ottim (Explain)
-
--
CHANGE f 0 HONORABLE
CHANGE TO GENERAWNDER
HONORABLE CONDITIONS
CHANGE TO UNCHARACTERIZ ED
(Not appl~cable for Air Force)
CHANGE NARRATIVE REASON FOR
SEPARATION TO:
3, UNIT AND LOCATION AT DISCHARGE
3 ~ E p A R A T I P Y
5 e p P ~ d
T m n #jx&S
I
' 7 . (X if applicable) d~ APPLICATION WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON IYYYYMMD~I
AND THIS FORM IS SUBMITTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL ISSUES, JUSTIFICATION, OR EVIDENCE.
8. IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION. THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE: IContinue in Item 17.
9. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED (X one)
/( CONDUCT A RECORD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONNEL FILE AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
SUBMITTED BY ME. I ANDlOR Icounsel/representativel WILL NOT APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD.
I I AND/OR IcounseVrepresenrativel WISH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE BOARD I N THE
WASHINGTON, D.C. METROPOUTAN AREA.
I ANDlOR Icounsel/representativel WlSH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE A TRAVELING PANEL CLOSEST TO
(NOTE: The Navy Discharge Review Board does not have a tmveling panel.)
(enter city and stare1
1 O.a. COUNSELIREPRESENTATIVE (If any] NAME [Last, First, M~ddle In,t~a/] AND ADDRESS I b. TEEPHONE NUMBES IInclude Area Code1
-
E.
ll. APPLICANT MUST &ION IN ITEM 13.a. BELOW, If the record in question is that of ! deceased or incompetent person, LEGAL PROOF OF
DEATH OR INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. If the application is signed by other than the applicant. indicate
the name (pri~rl
SPOUSE
and relationship by marking a box below.
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
OTHER [Specify)
NEXT OF KIN
WIDOWER
WIDOW
d. FAX NUMBER Nnclude Area Coaej
I
- . .
12.a. CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS OF APPLICANT OR PERSON ABOVE
/c-"..-",f .."+:f:,.-.:--
:- -A,,
8
-, --.. -'.---A
I
I
I '
- . - -- - - , P - - - - . . - . - . , -
I
13. CERTIFICATION.
the foregoing statements, as part of my claim, with full knowledge of the
penalties involved for willfullyrmaking a false statement or claim. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Sections 287
and 1001, provide that an individual shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more rhan 5 years,
or both.)
I mak;
d. FAX NUMBER (Include Area Coda1
I
a. SIGNATME - REQUIRED IAwlicant or oerson h /rQA ! r above)
1
IYYYYMMDD)
b. DATE SIGNED - REQUIRED
3C05/0 11/33
'
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
'"' 'I
CASE NUMBER
(Do not write in this space.)
F p g f l F -
0026
Page 1 of 4 Pages
DD F ~ R M PY, ~ A R
2004
1 6. REMARKS llf ap~l~cablel
$,/he
encloged dmorc-nd~lw
Cmvefi1nc;,
t
M \ /
W l e d&r~fnc-%n
MAIL C~MPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.
ARMY
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. Louis
9700 Page Avenue
St: Louis; MO 631 32-5200
(See http://arba.arrny.pentagon.rnil)
AIR FORCE
Air Force Review Boards Agency
SAFIMRBR
550-C Street West, Suite 40
Randolph AFB; TX 781 50-4742
I
I
DD FORM 293, MAR 2004
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS
Naval Council of Personnel Boards
720 Kennon Street, S.E.
Room 309 (NDRB)
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5023
COAST GUARD
U.S. Coast Guard
Commandant IG-WPM)
2100 Second Street, S.W. Room 5500
Washingtoti, DC 20593
I
J
Page 2 of 4 Pages
I
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND
Fpyms- 6aaH
MEMORANDUM FOR 82 TRWICC
FROM: 383 TRSICC
SUBJECT: Request for Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Court Martial -
A1C
1. I recommend the attached request for discharge be approved for the following reasons:
offense would normally warrant a General Court Martial
Although A1 C
and cannot be condoned, there were mitigating factors, which cause me to believe this
request is in the best interests of the United States Air Force. AlC
has been
subjected to the consequences of being phased back from phase I11 to pnase r as a result
of the investigation; this in and of itself restricted his liberty. In addition, there is a
potential that the circumstances of this case would not result in a conviction thereby
inhibiting the Air Force's ability to impose good order and discipline. An Under Other
Than Honorable Conditions Discharge would ensure appropriate disposition and would
reflect an accurate characterization of the discredit he has brought upon the United States
Air Force.
2. If this request for discharge is approved, I recommend that A1C
furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge. Member has not been
promised or led to believe that the discharge to be issued would be anything except the
worst authorized.
be
a. Is not under investigation.
b. Is r~ot awaiting action under AFX 36-2503 and 36-3212, or another section of AFI
36-3208.
c. Is not awaiting result of trial.
d. Is not absent without authority.
e. Is not absent in hands of civilian authorities.
f. Has been scheduled for a separation physical on 18 Mar 05,1300 hours..
g. Is not in default with respect to public property or funds.
h. Has not completed 16 or more years of active military service.
F p z ~ e 5 - w Z ~ Z ,
i.
Is not accountable or responsible for public property or funds.
j. Has not received special pay, bonuses, or education assistance.
4. There has not been a report of recent misconduct.
5. Court-martial charges have been preferred. Attached is a copy of charges, DD Form
458, Charge Sheet.
6. Charges have not been referred for trial.
7. At the time of misconduct, AlC
that caused him to lack the substantial c;iipac;liy either to appreciate the criminality
(wrongfulness) of the acts, or to conform to the law (AFI 44-109). He presently has the
capacity to understand the nature of the proceedings and to assist in the defense.
did not have a mental disease or defect
8. A1 C McCarthan does not hold a Reserve of the Air Force appointment as a
commissioned or warrant officer.
9. Information fiom the military record follows:
a. Date and term of enlistment: 29 Dec 03,6 years; date this period of continuous
active duty started: 29 Dec 03; pay-day: 29 Dec 03; TAFMSD: 29 Dec 03; and dates
of prior service: Delayed Enlistment Program: 26 Aug 03 to 28 Dec 03
b. Date of Birth: 1 Nov 85
c. Test Scores: Admin -29; Elect -24; Gen -53; Mech - 28
d. Fonnal Training: Basic Military Training, 3 Oct 03; Member was discnrolled
from Aero Medical Service Apprentice Course, J3AQR4N03 1-004 on 18 Mar 05 for
academic reasons,
e. Date Assigned to Unit: 23 Feb 04
f. Current Grade and Effective Date: A1 C, 13 Feb 04
g. Demotions: Member has not been involved in any misconduct to warrant
demotion.
h. Time Lost: None
i. Record of Disciplinary Actions: None.
j. Overall rating or ratings on Enlisted Performance Reports: None.
k. Favorable communications, citations, or awards: Air Force Training hbbon and
National Defense Service Medal.
1. Derogatory data, other than action by court-martial or under Article 15, UCMJ: See
attachments 6 through 12.
rn. Medical or other data meriting con side ratio^^: None
-
Commander
, Lt Col, USAF, BSC
Attachments:
1. Request for Discharge In Lieu of Trial by Court Martial, undated with 1 atch
2. DD Form 458,8 Mar 05
3. OSI ROI, 9 Nov 04 w/12 exhibits,
4. AFOSI Form 158,21 Jan 05
5. A.FOSIForm 158,l Feb05
6. LOR, 3 Mar 05
7. LOR, 14Feb 05
8. LOC, 13 Jan 05
9. A1 C McCarthan response to LOC dated 13 Jan 05
10. LOR, 1 Oct 04
11. A1C McCarthan response to LOR dated 6 Oct 04
12. LOR, 19 Feb 04
13. Separation Physical
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00057
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00057 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, two Letters of Reprimand, a Letter of Admonishment and a Record of Individual Counseling for misconduct. DISCUSSXON: As the separation authority, you must make four determinations: (1) whether a basis for discharge exists; (2) whether an involuntary discharge is appropriate in...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0405
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. Separate ~ B a ( l l ( l l l l ( l 0 N l t h m under honorable conditions (general) discharge, with or without Probation & ~ehabaitation; c. Recommend to the Commander of the 8th Air Force that AB- be separated with an honorable discharge, with or without Probation & Rehabilitation; or d. Direct that A e given the opportunity to present his case before an...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00016
550 C STREET WEST, SUI'TF 40 RANDOLPH APB, TX 781 50-4742 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW 1535 COMMAND DR. RE WING, JR ANDREWS APB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD~2006~00016 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00190
Copies of Disciplinary Infractions Letters With Rebuttals. On or about 19 Nov 04, you wore an earring off-duty, but on-base when it was unlawful to do so, For this misconduct, you received: (1) a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 1 Dec 04, which was filed in your Unfavorable Information File (UIF); and, (2) a Vacation of Suspended Punishment, dated 23 Dec 04, received from a prior Article 15, dated 8 Oct 04. b. I have made an appointment for you to consult with the Area Defense Counsel...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00040
MD 20162-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used ~ 1 I 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00040 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. LOR, 19 JUL 04 - Late reporting to a scheduled appointment.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00222
...............2 RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATIOY OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER I DENY I I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE HEARING DATE 1 13 Mar 2007 CASE NUMBER ( FD-2006-00222 I I I I I APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00256
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and four Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of thc discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. MATTERS SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT: On 7 Dec 04, A1 ~ i - - - - - - - ' :was given the opportunity to...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00462
(Change Discharge to Honorable, Change the RE Code, and Reason for Discharge) Issue 1: I would like the Air Force Review Board to change my code, because I'm wanting to return to the Air Force either as active duty as prior or as a reservist. for which you were punished under Article 15, c. On 7 Jan 05, you failed to report to work cm time, for which you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 7 Jan 05, which was filed in your Personal Information File (PIF), d. On 15 Jul04, the wit was...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00328
AIR FORCE 1)ISrHARCE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMhlAND DR, El3 WINC, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762.7002 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I 1 I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NCJMRER FD-2006-00328 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, three Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, four Records of Individual Counseling and Iwo Memorandums...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00366
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The misconduct included underage drinking, driving under the influence, late for duty (five times), negativelchallenging attitude at work, failing to maintain proper uniform standards, financial irresponsibility, and failing to obey a lawful order (three times). ...