NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
JTYPE GEN
( X
1
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
(
1 RECORDREVIEW
I
1
MEMBER SITTING
1
2
3
4
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE
HEARING DATE
07 Dec 2003
CASE NUMBER
FD-2002-0405
Case heard at Randolph AFB, Texas.
-
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.
TO:
SAFlMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
I PROM:
I
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCII.
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FIOOR
ANLIREWS AFB, MD 20762-1002
- -
- -
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD2002-040,j
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise t h s right.
" The attached brief contiins the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge to Honorable is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
impropriety that would justify upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the
discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the board was unable to identify any that would justify
a change of discharge. The records indicated the applicant received three Articles 15, nine Letters of
Reprimand, and six Letters of Counseling. The misconduct included driving under the influence, sleeping
on post, late for duty, failure to go, financial irresponsibility, failure to obey, unauthorized charges on
government travel card, late for an appointment, and malingering. The DRB opined that through these
administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board
concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The
characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 5 Apr 01 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Honorable
Disch.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 21 Nov 80. Enlmt Age: 17 6/12. Disch Age: 20 4/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-63, E-48, G-44, M-41. PAFSC: 3P031 - Security Forces Apprentice.
DAS: 9 Jan 99.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 22 May 98 - 25 Aug 98 (3 months 4 days) (Inactive).
3 .
SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as A m 26 Aug 98 for 6 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 7 Mo 11 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AE3 - 2 Mar 01 (Article 15, 2 Mar 01)
A m - 12 Feb 01 (Article 15, 12 Feb 01)
A1C - 10 Oct 98
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 2 Mar 01, Barksdale AFB, LA - Article 111. You did, on
or about 3 Feb 01, near the - - - - - - Club, physically
control a vehicle, to wit: a passenger car, while the
alcohol concentration in your breath was 0.10 grams of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath or greater as shown by
chemical analysis. Reduction to Al3. Suspended
forfeiture of $500.00 pay. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
(2) 12 Feb 01, Barksdale AFB, LA - Article 86. You did, on
or about 1 Feb 01, without authority, fail to go at the
time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
Reduction to A m . (No appeal) (No mitigation)
(3) 22 Apr 99, Barksdale AFB, LA - Article 113. You, on or
about 26 Mar 99, being posted as Venom 7, were found
sleeping upon your post. Suspended reduction to A m l
and 14 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 09 JAN 01 - Late for duty.
LOR, 31 DEC 00 - Failure to go.
LOCI 30 DEC 00 - Late for duty.
LOCI 23 NOV 00 - Failure to go.
LOR, 03 NOV 00 - Financial irresponsibility.
LOR,
LOR,
03 OCT 00 - Failure to go.
24 SEP 00 - Failure to obey a lawful general order or
LOR,
LOR,
LOR,
LOR,
LOC ,
LOC ,
LOC ,
LOC ,
regulation.
card.
31 MAY 00 - Unauthorized charges on government credit
14 FEB 00 - Late for duty.
04 FEB 00 - Late for duty.
31 MAR 99 - Failure to go.
25 MAR 99 - Failure to go.
25 MAR 99 - Late for appointment.
01 MAR 99 - Malingering on duty.
01 MAR 99 - Failure to go.
. -
f . CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 26 Aug 98 - 25 Apr 00 Barksdale AFB 3 (Initial)
(Discharged from Barksdale AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (2) Yrs (10) Mos (15) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (7) Mos (10) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Frn 293) dtd 20 Sep 02.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: Documents will be presented at hearing. I plan to have documents
pertaining to my conduct and mode of living since discharge to show that I am a
productive, law abiding, contributing member of society.
ATCH
1. DD Form 214.
.OcC 2 5 0 2 0 2 3 5 6 ~
U S R F M P F R S G H T S
( 3 1 8 1 4 5 6 - 3 4 2 8
P . 3
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 2D BOMB WING (ACC)
BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, LOUISIANA
MEMORANDUM FOR 2 BW/CC
FROM: 2 BWIJA (A1 C I I ) S I )
SUBJECT:
. ..
EN ANT COLONE ' *
e i n v o l u n t a r
i
ischarge
2 SFS
ecommends that
l ~ d i s c h ~ ~
Infractions purs
7
para 5.49. He recommends an under honorable conditions (reneral) discharge without Probation
and Rehabilitation. B a d 011 ~ ~ v i m i
entitled to a discharge board. Therefore, his case is being processed pursuant to the notification
procedures. We have reviewed the complete file and recomnlend that AB
t e h
tenurde/&k, he is not
t Y Y i m i
.L,
m
e
separated with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge and that no
Probation and Rehabilitation be offered.
2. Airmen serve in the Regular Air Fdrce for terms specified by Congress, but Congress permits
early separation under certain specified conditions. Congress has delegated the authority to
specify those conditions to the Secretary of the Air Force. The Secretary has implemented that
delegation in AFI 36-3208, the AFI governing this case.
3. We have examined the corn~lete record and find no ~rocedural deficiencies. AIRMAN
BASIC-as
right to consult cou~lsel, and his other procedural rights.
been informed of k s commander's recommendation, his
4. LIEUTENAN? COLO
as the basis for discharge.
disregarded Air Force rules and instructions.
in Minor Disciplinary lnfiactions when he did the following: drove a vehicle while under the
influence, failed to go to his appointed place of duty on twelve (1 2) different occasions, failed to
pay his government travel card on time, made unauthorized charges on his government credit
card, was found sleeping on duty, and malingering on duty.
Disciplinary Infractions
gaged
5. AIRMAN BASIC
as not submitted matters for your consideration.
6 . If you decide to discharge
service characterization. LIE
under honorable conditions (
under honorable conditions (general) is appropriate when significant negative aspects of the
airman's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the airman's military
record. In this case, an under honorable conditions (general) is warranted by A-
recommends an
U S R F M P F R S G M T S
. ..
-cord
attachments demonstrate why this characterization is appropriate.
and will accurately characterize his service. The Letter of Notification and its
-
7. Finally, you must also consider whether to suspend discharge for a period of Probation md
Rehabilitation. Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 7, provides that Probation and
Rehabilitation should be offered to airmen when it is reasonably possible to do so. For example,
Probation and Rehabilitation might be offered to those airmen: (1) who have demonstrated a
potential to serve satisfactorily; (2) who have the capacity to be rehabilitated for continued
military service or for completion of the current enlistment; and (3) whose retention on active
duty in a probationary status is consistent with the maintenance of good order and discipline.
Based on the unit's failed attempts to rehabilitate AB
he does not have the desire to be rehabilitated. There
Probation and Rehabilitation and the preponderance of the evidence supports his
recommendation.
it is evident that
rnmends against
8. As the ~e~aratf0.n Authority, you have the following options:
a Retain ABI~.Y(*IIY~~
find that discharge is not warranted by the
evidence or under the circumstances;
o
b. Separate ~ B a ( l l ( l l l l ( l 0 N l t h m under honorable conditions (general)
discharge, with or without Probation & ~ehabaitation;
c. Recommend to the Commander of the 8th Air Force that AB-
be separated with an honorable discharge, with or without Probation & Rehabilitation; or
d. Direct that A
e given the opportunity to present his case
before an administrative discharge board, if you find that discharge under other than honorable
conditions (UOTHC) is warranted,
.act' 25 02 02: 56p
-i
USflF MPF flSGMTS
9. RECOMMENDATION: Separate AB
Force with an under honorable conditiods
Rehabilitation.
om the United States Air
I concur.
Assistant staff Judge Advocate
D&U+ stiff ~ u d ~ e
Advocate
ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
This is a privileged document. It will not be released in whole
or part without the approval of the Staff Judge Advocate.
a c t ' 25 02 02: 5 7 p
USflF MPF flSGMTS
( 3 1 8 1 4 5 6 - 3 4 2 8
FaSw2- d y f l g
P . 8
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 20 BOMB WING (ACC)
BARKSOALE AIR FORCE SASE, LOUISIANA
MEMORANDUM FOR AB
FROM: 2 SFSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Letter - Administrative Discharge
1. I am recommending that you be discharged from the united States Air Force forMinor
Disciplinary Infractions,: The authority for this action is AFI 36-3208, para 5.49. If my
recomn~endation is approved, your service may be characterized as under honorable conditions
(general).
2. My reasons for this action are as follows:
a. On or about 3 Feb 01, you drove while under the influence, as evidenced by an Article
1 5, dated 9 Mar 0 1 (TAB A);
6. On or about 1 Feb 01, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty, as evidenced
by an Article 15, dated I4 Fob 01 (TAB B);
c. On or about 9 Jan 01, you failed to report to duty on time, as evidenced by a Letter of
Reprimand (LOR), dated 9 Jan 01 (TAB C);
d. On or about 22 Nov 00, you failed to show up to M-16 tiring practice, as evidenced by
an LOR, dated 3 1 Dec 00 (TAB D);
e. On or about 30 Dec 00, you failed to show up for guardmount on time, as evidenced
by a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 30 Dec 00 (TAB E);
f. On or about 13 Nov 00, you failed to show up to M-16 firing appointment, as
evidenced by an LOC, dated 23 Nov 00 (TAB F);
g. On or about 3 Nov 00, you failed to pay off your government travel card on time, as
evidenced by an LOR, dated 3 Nov 00 (TAB G);
h. On or about 3 Oct 00, you failed to show up for a mandatory appointment, as
evidenced by an LOR, dated 3 Oct 00 (TAB H);
i. On or about 22 Sep 00, you failed to be on standby, as evidenced by an LOR, dated
24 Sep 00 (TAB I);
: 7Oct.25 02 02:57p
U S R F M P F R S G M T S
F
j. Between on or about 1 1 Mar OOiahd 28 Apr 00, you made several unauthorized charges
on your Government travel card, as evidenced by an LOR, dated 3 1 May 00 (TAB J);
k. 011 or about 12 Feb 00, you were late to duty, as evidenced by an LOR, dated
14 Feb 00 (TAB K);
I. On or about 04 Feb 00, you failed to show up to duty on time, as evidenced by. an LOR,
dated 04 Feb 01 (TAB L);
rn. On or about 12 Mar 99, you failed to go to a mandatory dental appointment, as
evidenced by an LOR, dated 3 1 Mar 99 (TAB M);
n. On or about 22 Mar 99, you failed to show up for guardmount on time, as evidenced
by an LOC, dated 25 Mar 99 (TAB N);
o. On or about 24 Mar 99, you failed to show up to M-16 firing appointment on time, as
evidenced by an LOC, +ted 25 Mar 99 (TAB 0);
p. On or about 1 Mar 99, you were found malingering on the job, as evidenced by an
LOC, dated I Mar 99 (TAB P);
q. On or about 28 Feb 99, you failed to attend a mandatory training session, as evidenced
by an LOC, dated 1 Mar 99 (TAB Q) and;
r. On or about 26 Mar 99, you were found sleeping on duty, as evidenced by an Article
15, dated 27 Apr 99 (TAB R).
3. Copies of the documentts) referenced above have been attached and will be forwarded to the
separation authority in support of this recommendation. The cormnander exercising SPCM
jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air
Force, and if you art: discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged,
you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
4. Military Iegal counsel, Cap
ea Defense Counsel (ADC) for Barksdale AFB,
Extension 6-8355, Building 4714 (gym annex building), third floor, has been obtained to assist
you. An appointment has been scheduled for you to consult with the ADC on '12 ~ u r . at
'n$;o
hrs. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.
5. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to Flight,Medicine
with your medical records for the appoin
Your appointment is on 7,8,wa) at
e. 04q &~sur CJ 3
6. You have the right to submit statements on your behalf. Any statements you want the ,
separation authority to consider must reach me within three (3) duty days, unless you request and
receive an extension for good cause. I will send any statements that you provide to the separation
authority.
7. You have been scheduled for a Pre-separation Counseling briefing. You must report to the
Family Support Center, Bldg 4713, at 43' on 7$ f l k ~ , for the briefing.
'.0ct' 25 0 2 0 2 : 5 8 p
USAF HPF ASGMTS
[ 3 1 8 1 4 5 6 - 3 4 2 8
p. 10
I
8. Ifyou fail to consult counsel or fail to submit statements on your behalf, you will waive the
right to do so.
9. Any personal information that you fiunish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974.
A copy of AFT 35-3208, the AFI governing this case, is available for your use in your unit
Orderly Room.
10. Execute the attached acknowledgem
a Article IS, dated 9 Mar 0 1
b. Article 15, dated 14 Feb 01
c. LOR, dated 9 Jan 0 1
d. LOR, dated 3 1 Dec 00
e. LOC, dated 30 Dec 00
f. LOC, dated 23 Nov 00
g. LOR, dated 3 Nov 00
h. LOR, dated 3 Oct 00
i. LOR, dated 24 Sep 00
j. LOR, dated 3 1 May 00
k. LOR, dated 14 Feb 00
1. LOR,&ted4Feb00.
rn. LOR, dated 3 1 Mar 99
n. LOR, dated 25 Mar 99
o. LOC, dated 25 Mar 99
p. LOC, dated 1 Mar 99
q. LOC, dated 1 mar 99
r. Article 15, dated 27 Apr 99
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00014
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp303-00014 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00014 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD 1.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00079
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD-01-00079 (Former SRA) 1. c. Recommend the respondent be separated with an honorable discharge, with or without probation and rehabilitation, and forward the case to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority (1 1 AF/CC) or his designee (1 1 AF/CV) for action. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and any spG%l pay, bonus, or education...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0275
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL [YES | No | xX VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x Pe x xX xX a x ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A94.05 A67.10 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 2 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00222
...............2 RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATIOY OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER I DENY I I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE HEARING DATE 1 13 Mar 2007 CASE NUMBER ( FD-2006-00222 I I I I I APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00292
(No appeal) (No mitigation) ( 3 ) 7 Jun 00, Barksdale AFB, LA - Article 92. (Change Discharge to Honorable) NO ISSUES SUBMITTED .- - ATCH None. (atch c); d. On or about 18 Apr 00, you failed to go to a mandatory appointment, as evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) dated 27 Apr 00 (atch d); e. On or about 20 ~~r 6, you failed to attend ii mandatory comniandt?~ call, as evid-enced / by an LOR dated 27 Apr 00 (at& d); f. On or about 2 1 Apr 00, you failed to pay your debt to American Cash...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0254
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2002-0254 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The misconduct included late to work, failing a dorm room inspection, failure to go, financial irresponsibility, and improper wear of chemical warfare gear during an exercise. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1 .
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00499
JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MU 20162.71102 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00499 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPAR'IlfENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE'REVIEW BOARD ---------------------------. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, and AFI 36-3208, Administrative...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0514
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0514 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process, In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0320
Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0320 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. Direct that the respondent be discharged from the Air Force with a General discharge with or without probation and rehabilitation under AFI 36-3208, section H paragraph 5.49; c. Forward a recommendation for separation under paragraph 5.49 with an Honorable discharge to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority, AFSOC/CC (AFI 36-3208,...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD01-00091
ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Minor Disciplinary Infractions. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I should've (sic) a medical discharge when instead I got an honorable/general discharge. Recommendation: Discharge Respondent with a general discharge without P&R.