Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00004
Original file (FD2005-00004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
+

 

 

a AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
Wincor SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

SrA

   

 

| PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW

 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANEZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER SITTING HON Gen | voTac | oTHER | “DENY
x
“4
-
—_.
x
[ISSUES A94.06 INDEX NUMBER A49.00 : Peo
A93.22 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
A92.20 j 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
[3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
[4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
15 Jul 2005 FD-2005-00004

 

 

       

2S: DECISION, TION AL-ARE BISEE

    

_ APPLICANT'S ISSUE-AND THE BOA SU ONTHE- ATTACHED. AIR PERCE DISCHARGE REVIEW.BO),

  

DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

 

   

 

 

   

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicapt’s request.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FROM:

TO:
#CRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAF/MRBR ABR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
530 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 5. COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 60-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used
CASE NUMBER

  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISI@NAL RATIONALE FD-2005-00004

  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
   
  
 
 
  
  
  

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharffe to honorable, change the reason and authority
for the discharge, and change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the§[Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this nght.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the agplicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: The Board grants partial relief. The discha§ge is upgraded to Honorable. The reason and
authority for discharge and the reenlistment code will not bafchanged.

 
   

  
 
  
  
 
 
 
 

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nd that provided by applicant substantiates an
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Mlowever, based upon the record and evidence
provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s reasorand authority for discharge inequitable.

ISSUE: Applicant does not contest her discharge; She stat@s that she feels that she is able to contribute her
expertise to our military and would like to rejoin. Sheffalso states that she lost her civilian job upon
returning from Desert Shield/Desert Storm. The majority [pf the applicant’s military records are missing.
From what the Board does have, it indicates the applicant sefved satisfactory for eight (8) years and then hurt
her back, as documented in the available medical records§ then missed her UTAs and was subsequently
demoted from SSgt to SrA on 15 Dec 92. The Board app§auds the applicant for her desire to reenter the
military, however, since she is currently 51 years of agefland only has eight good years for retirement
purposes which means she cannot obtain the remaining
reaching age 60, her reentry to the military is not possible.

    
  
 

to the applicant’s eight good years served, noting that she sighed up for six years and extended for 36 months
in order to deploy to Desert Shield/Desert Storm, that herfoverall characterization should be classified as
Honorable.

 
 
  
    
 

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluges that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge gegulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full #dministrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board]ffurther concludes that the overall quality of
apphcant’s service is more accurately reflected by an Honordble under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.

  

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2005-00004

DEPARTMENT OF THE IR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE HEVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, §MD

(Former SrA) (HGH SSGT)
MISSING DOCUMENTS

 

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Digfh fr Jacksonville JAP, FL on 30
Apr 93 UP ANGR 39-10, para 5-8a (Unsatisfactoyf Participation). Appeals for
Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code Reason and Authority for

Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 14 Jun 54. Enlmt Age: 30 4/12. Pisch Age: 38 10/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-67, E-40, G-70, M-39. PAFSC: [0250 - Passenger Movement
Specialist. DAS: Unknown.

b. Prior Sv: None.

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

 

a. Enlisted as AB 30 Oct 84 for 6 years Extended 1 Sep 90 for 36 months.

Svd: 08 Yrs 08 Mo 00 Das, of which AMS is 10 bp 28 Das.
b. Grade Status: SrA - 15 Dec 92 {Denmbtion Order, 13 Jan 93)
SSgt - O01 Feb 88
SrA - O1 Sep &6
AlC - O1 Mar 86
Amn - 11 Aug 85

c. Time Lost: None.

d. Art 15's: (1) Unknown.
e. Additional: Unknown.

£. CM: None.

g. Record of SV: Unknown.

h. Awards & Decs: AFOUA, AFMSM W/1l BOL@, NDSM, AFLSA W/1 BOLC, AFTR,
FLORIDA COMM MEDAL, FLORIDA SVC RBN.

 

i. Stmt cf Sv: TMS: (08) Yrs (08) Mos 0G) Das
TAMS: {00) Yrs (10) Mos §28) Das

4, BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appin (DD Fm B93) dtd 29 Dec 04
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Chang@ the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge.)
FD2005-00004

Issue 1: ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.

ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.

23FEBO5/day
03 JAN 2605 aoe bo Fd 200 5-0000f

APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHAMGE Form Approved
FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED S#ATES OMB No. 0704-0004
(Please read instructions an Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing thi] application.) Expires Aug 31, 2006

 

 

 

The public reporting burden for this collection of infarmation is estimated to average 30 minutes per respopse, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sauces,
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collectian

gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. 5
of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, ta the Department of Defense, Executive Seniees and Communications Directorate (0704-0004). Respondents should be aware
that notwithstanding any other provision of law, na person shall be subject ta any penalty for failing to c ply with a cailection of infarmation if it does not display a currently valid OMB

control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION. BRETURN COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON
BACK OF THIS PAGE. ‘

 

 

PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

AUTHORITY: 10U.S.C, 1553; £.0, 9397,
PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S}: To apply for a change in the characterization or reasa

ROUTINE USE(S} None,
DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure to provide identifying information magjimpede processing of this application. The request for

Social Security Number is strictly to assure proper identification of the individual find appropriate records.

or military discharge issued to an individual.

1. APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed). PLEASE|JPRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a. BRANCH OF SERVICE /X one} Tarmy | | MARINE CORPS NAVY AIR FORCE COAST GUARD
b. NAME (Last Fy ii ces. ¢. GRADE/RANE AT DISCHARGE d. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
. ORA
2. DATE 0 A R SEPARATION | 4. DISCHARGE CHARACTERIZATI RECEIVED (X one/} 5. BOA D &X one}
(YYYYMMDD) {if date is more than 15 years HONORABLE CHANGE TO HONORABLE
agensubmitallD.robe) Was) GENERAL/UNDER HONORABLE COMpITIONS GHANGE TO GENERAL/UNDER
9494 f AO | UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE BONDITIONS HONORABLE Conor’
|} CHANGE TO UNCHARACTERIZED
3. UNIT AND LOCATION AT DISCHARGE BAD CONDUCT (Special court-marta onty} (Not anplicable for Air Force}
OR SEPARATION UNCHARACTERIZED CHANGE NARRATIVE REASON FOR
} Aotrh (oc ahter GO : SEPARATION TO:
= OTHER fExplain}
ex awe FL

 

 

6. ISSUES: WHY AN UPGRADE OR CHANGE IS REQUESTED AND JUSTIFICATIQINN FOR fede by {Continue in ftem 14, See instructions an

Page 3.) 7 iasewtd 17 Yo. +o hee Cr egrede eCcause XX Creal
Tt are able —o Corctc- bude oo eo Qerk se. de Gus Ofsud L

—

my lHaey . “Lar TYOLO leren Hen oes and able bel oes

7. (X if applicable) AN APPLICATION WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON syygivMmoo)

AND THIS FORM /S SUBMITTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL ISSUES, JUSTIFIGRTION, OR EVIDENCE.
&. IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION, THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED DOCUMEMMS ARE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE: ‘Continue in item 77.

if military documents or medical records are relevant to your case, please send copies.}

 

 

 

9. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED (X onej
CONDUCT A RECORD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONMEL FILE AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
SUBMITTED 8Y ME. | AND/OR (counse//representative) WILL NOT APPEAR BEFORE TH§ BOARD.

LAND/OR ‘counsel/representative} WISH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE BOARD IN THE

WASHINGTON, D.C. METROPOLITAN AREA.
1 AND/OR fcounsel/representative) WISH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE A TRAVELING PANEL CLOSEST TO
{NOTE:BThe Navy Discharge Review Board does not have a traveling panel. j

fenter city and state}
10.a. COUNSEL/REPRESENTATIVE (if any) NAME (cast, First, Middle Initia!! AND APDBESS {|b TEL Code!

(See fem 76 of the instructions about counsel/representative. }

 

 

c. E-

d. FAX NUMBER {include Vea Code)

 

 

11. APPLICANT MUST SIGN IN ITEM 13.a. BELOW. Hi the record in question is thitt of a deceased or incompetent person, LEGAL PROOF OF

DEATH OR INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. It the [[pplication is signed by other than the applicant, indicate
the name print} and relatiatship by marking a box below.

SPOUSE wIpoWw WIDOWER NEXT OF KIN LEGAL REPBESENTATIVE OTHER (Specify?
12.a. CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS OF APPLICANT OR PERSON ABOVE b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include Area Code}
{Forward notification of any change in address. )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c. EMA

 

{
d. FAX NUMBER {include Area Code)

 

13. CERTIFICATION. |i make the foregoing statements, as part of my claim, with full knowledge of the CASE NUMBER
penalties involved for willfully making a false statement or claim. (U.S. Code, File 74, Sections 287 (Do not write in this space.)

and 1001, provide that an individual shall be fined under this title or imprisonelf not more than 5 years,

or both.} FY 2005 —

 

a. SIGNAZURE - REQUIRED /Appiicant or person in Htem 17 above! b, DATE SIBNED - REQUIRED
a IVYVYYMEDD)
pon ha C000
DD FORM 293, MAR 2004 : PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OB@OLETE. Page 1 of 4 Pages
FD 2@OS- COCOF

     
 

14, CONTINUATION OF ITEM 6, ISSUES //f applicable)
toe Ssecve Gue Caentea CAgarn.

—_

Store au teb Ql, AL
Ceducn, 2 returned ta mi

pos docleyed dusiog Nesect
nc beew 34 ered. Upon
‘lan sal. Moa Bose ks oa
acl beew E led | I asas

      
    

as acd mini sheat ue OSS Stat

    
 

manager. act requis rac
=

Apple rimrotely a Weacs for Cosy
tacormed the medrcal be

15. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 8, SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS //f applicable}
Lrcnatlkle ak +heat Attene +o Co

Byer KLatkanal Guacd.

& Coan mou Caoroletds Ke
Onde, Aaaw Love “ba sate

eel urthK all thal js) occuc
Sdmeihore TA tho LLS. moilira
fouc me.

  
 

—

     

Aue Mri, eost 1g BAN he

         

aled amd LO bud

   

 
  
   

    
  

  
 
     
  

 

 
  

16. REMARKS fff applicable}
Ld @S Ungatc Fee “hoe “a bo

do the Gaet thar TL lose Poy
dee lou rerst. . NE mm ork eac deo
haue ne ceq frets, Orbe pede) Lb
have Ween Put wo R Paschanr
ae isout&d& loype bo Yelp OUR

CIM dee. Consdecotror ,

held BACT AST Onc aA we
bP iLiad! job Been
Arner Cup Om cadint chet
bin wonrlé WN 2a aur

Can, ren ON wt lan 3 aly :

Din Onee Aga: a

      
 

      

   

   
 

       
 
 

             
  
 

 
    

MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

    
     

ARMY

Navat Council of Personne! Boards

720 Kennon Street, S.E.
Room 309 (NDRB)
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5023

  
 

  

Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. Louis

9700 Page Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63132-5200

(See http: //arba.army.pentagen.mil}

   

     
 

 
   
 

  
 

 
 
    
  

AIR FORCE COAST GUARD

  
 
 

  
 

U.S. Coast Guard
Commandant (G-VWPM}
2100 Second Street, $.W. Room 5500

Washington, DC 20593

Air Force Review Boards Agency
SAF/MRBR

550-C Street West, Suite 40
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4742

    
 

 
 
   

 
     

 

DD FORM 293, MAR 2004 Page 2 of 4 Pages

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00245

    Original file (FD2005-00245.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2005-00245 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD a (Former...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00405

    Original file (FD2006-00405.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I I 22 Mar 2007 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON TllE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DlSCliARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2006-00405 Case heard in Washington, D.C. Advisc applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR 1 Names and votes will bc madc available to thc applicant at the applicant's request. g. Record of SV: Unknown. (Change Discharge to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2008-00347

    Original file (FD-2008-00347.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN — x | RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ISSUES Ag 00 INDEX NUMBER A01.13 A01.39 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION = OF PERSONNEL FILE Ge ph | a COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD [ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING f— + HEARING DATE CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00243

    Original file (FD2006-00243.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The misconduct included leaving the local area without approved leave, dereliction of duty, failure to follow verbal and written orders, failure to go, and disrespecting a commissioned officer on two separate occasions. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SSGT) 1. You ,,-- & g ~ i f i q knownledge of a lawful order issued by 2Lt ; ..................... to remain at the commander's call and help out, an...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00400

    Original file (FD2005-00400.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. (Change Discharge to Honorable Discharge, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. I served four years, five months and twenty-eight day8 of active duty.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD01-00145

    Original file (FD01-00145.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD “YES NO x NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN ~ —- erage SSGT | (ae. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p.01-00145 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of her discharge to general. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenld as SSGT 86/12/08 for 6 yrs.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00077

    Original file (FD2006-00077.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD VAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MlDDLE INITIAL) .------------------------, . Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00077 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed).

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00339

    Original file (FD2005-00339.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00339 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Vacation action resulting in her reduction to airman first class was for failure to go to appointed place of duty. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, she signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on June 26,2001) that...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00211

    Original file (FD2005-00211.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TO: SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2005-002114 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. d. Art 15’s: (1) 14 Jan 93, Elemendorf AFB, AK - Article 91. Plea: G....

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00413

    Original file (FD2004-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. (Change Discharge to Honorable} ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. d. On or about 5 Apr 96, you failed to report for duty at the appointed time.