AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
VAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MlDDLE INITIAL)
.------------------------,
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
1
'YpE GEN
YES
No
X
GRADE
SRA
I
X
AFSNISSAN
366-94-6634
RECORDREVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
.......................................
1
ISSUES
A94.05
INDEX NUMBER
A84.00
HEARING DATE
I
CASE NUMBER
"as heard in Washington, DT
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE
4dvise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an
ipplication to the AFBCMR
Vames and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
-
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
(EF-V?)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2006-00077
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or inlpropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Although not explicitly stated, applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh.
The records indicated the applicant was separated from the Nevada Air National Guard for unsatisfactory
participation. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all
military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be
appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former SRA) (HGH SRA)
MISSING DISCHARGE DOCUMENTS
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recld a GEN Disch fr NV ANG Reno, NV on 30 Sep 00
UP AFI 36-3209, para 3.13.2.2 (Unsatisfactory Participation). Appeals for
Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 17 Aug 62. Enlmt Age: 31 5/12. Disch Age: 38 1/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-84, E-96, G-88, M-85. PAFSC: 3M031 - Services Specialist
Apprentice. DAS: Unknown.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 7 Jun 84 - 13 Aug 84 (2 months 7 days) (Inactive) .
Sgt 24 Aug 89 for 4 years. Svd: 7 years 7 months 3 days. A1C - Unknown. SrA -
28 Jan 87. Sgt 28 Jan 88.
(2) Enlisted AF as AB 14 Aug 84 for 6 years. Reenlisted as
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted MI ANG as SrA 24 Jul 94 for 6 years. Transferred to NV ANG 28
Feb 95. Svd: 06 Yrs 02 Mo 07 Das, AMS is unknown, no 526 available and not on
the NGB Fm 22.
b. Grade Status: None.
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: Unknown.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: Unknown.
h. Awards & Decs: AFGCM W/1 OAK LEAF CLUSTER, NDSM, AFOSLTR W/1 OAK LEAF
CLUSTER, AFLSAR, AFTR, NCOPMER .
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (13) Yrs (11) Mos (17) Das
TAMS: (07) Yrs (07) Mos (03) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 10 Apr 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Waiver of ineligibility for prior service enlistment package.
t
APPLICATION FORTHE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL
FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
(Please read ;nstructions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing :his application.)
:
' Form Approved
OMB No. 0704-0004
Expires Aug 3 1, 2006
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 0 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing i&tructions, searching existing data sources,
gathe-ring and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing tha collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection
of information, including suggestions for rhucing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate,for Information Operations and Reports 10704-00041.
1215Jefferson Davis Highwaj, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no,persOn shall be subject to any
penalty foi failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid O M 0 control number.
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON BACK OF THlS PAGE.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
AU'THORITY: 10 U.S.C. 1553; E.O. 9397.
PRINCIPAL PURPOSEfSl: To apply for a change in the characterization or reason for military discharge issued to an individu'al.
ROUTINE USE(S): None.
DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure to provide identifying information may impede processing of this application. The request for
Social Security Number is strictly to assure proper identification of the individual and appropriate records.
I. APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed). PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.
a. BRANCH OF SERVICE (X one)
1 ? 1 AIR FORCE
I MARINE CORPS
I COAST GUARD
1 NAVY
I ARMY
I
I
C-,,-....-.,..-...,..-.-.-..-.-,.-.-..-....-..
2. DATE OF ~ I S C ~ A R G E
OR SEPARATION
(WYYMMDD) (If date is more than 15 years
ago, submit a DD Form 149)
9000 s4w
3. UNIT AND LOCATION A T DISCHARGE
OR SEPARATION
- Ri r N d C
4. DISCHARGE CHARACTERIZATION RECEIVED (X one)
i2 -4
p
----
HONORABLE
GENERALIUNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
BAD CONDUCT (Special court-martial only)
UNCHARACTERIZED
OTHER (Explain1
I
1
5. BOARD ACTION REQUESTED (X one)
,&'
CHANGE TO HONORABLE
CHANGE TO GENERALIUNDER
HONORABLE CONDITIONS
CHANGE TO UNCHARACTERIZED
(Not applicable for Air Force)
CHANGE NARRATIVE REASON FOR
SEPARATION TO:
I
I
AND THlS FORM IS SUBMITTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL ISSUES, JUSTIFICATION, OR EVIDENCE.
8. IN SUPPORT OF THlS APPLICATION, THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE: /Continue in ltem 17.
If military documents or medical records are relevant to your case, please send copies.)
9. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED (X one)
I ANDIOR lcounsel/representative) WILL NOT APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD.
,CONDUCT A RECORD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONNEL FILE AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
SUBMITTED BY ME.
I AND/OR (counsel/representative/ WlSH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE BOARD IN THE
WASHINGTON, D.C. METROPOLITAN AREA.
I ANDIOR /counsel/representative) WlSH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE A TRAVELING PANEL CLOSEST TO
(NOTE: The Navy Discharge Review Board does not have a tra'veling panel.)
(enter cay and starel
10.a. COUNSELIREPRESENTATIVE (If anvl NAME (Last. First. Middle Initiall AND ADDRESS I b. TELEPHONE NUMBER flnclude Area Code)
.
.
, .
(See ltem 10 of rhe instructions about counsel/representative.)
c. E-MAIL
d. FAX NUMBER (lnclude Area Coda1
I
I
I
I
I 1 I. APPLICANT MUST SIGN IN ITEM 13.a. BELOW. If the record in question is that of a deceased or incompetent person, LEGAL PROOF OF
DEATH OR INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. If the application is signed by other than the applicant. indicate
the name (print)
SPOUSE
and relationship by marking a box below.
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
NEXT OF KIN
WIDOWER
WIDOW
12.a. CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS OF APPLICANT OR PERSON ABOVE
...............................
(Forward notification of any change in address.)
-----------
b. TELEPHOVENIJPIWR L I n c b v l p L C c ~ C b d e ~
c. E-MAIL;.-"""""::::::::::::::!-------
'.-..,-..- ,..-.....-.-......-..-.-..-.-..'
13. CERTIFICATION.
I make the foregoing statements, as part of my claim, with full knowledge of the
penalties involved for willfully making a false statement or claim. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Sections 287
and 1001, provide that an individual shall be fined under this title or imprisoned n o t more than 5 years,
- - - - .,
or hoth I
a. SIGNATURE- REQUIRED (Applicant orperson in Item 17 above)
b. DATE SIGNED - REQUIRED
(YYYYMMDD)
I
QV P
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
I
D o FORM 293, A~ 2003 U u
- CASE NUMBER
(Do n o t write in this space.)
Page 1 of 4 Pages
I
I
I J ~ L I ~ J +
14. CONTINUATION OF IT M 6 1 SUES (If applicablel
.' . g$Jckdq
fi:~ +F;,K .JXJMS
h/ufihi~
*o 1h qe ‘hifid? , a%y $ ~ r *
'+ VP &bQ
fipp~:~cab@-
&-
: .
*
. .
. .
hr, hp
. . . . .
.
.
.
.
, .
.
. .
,. R.+ lil. .
. ,,
. .. ,
:::.,
' %,,
. 1: , ,
b ~ h ~ g s . ,
. .: .
.
: ,
. .
.
.
?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.>. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
. .
.
. .
.
.
.:
" . . '
MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. Louis
9700 Page Avenue
St. Louis, MO 631 32-5200
(See http://arba.army.pentagon.mii)
AIR FORCE
Air Force Review Boards Agency
SAFIMRBR
550-C Street West, Suite 40
Randolph AFB, TX 781 50-4742
I
Naval Council of Personnel Boards
720 Kennon Street, S.E.
Room 309 (NDRBJ
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5023
COASTGUARD
U.S. Coast Guard
Commandant (G-WPM)
2100 Second Street, S.W. Room 5500
Washington, DC 20593
DD FORM 293, AUG 2 0 0 3
Page 2 of 4 Pages
Memorandum
To:
5Vhonl It May Co~~cern
Date: 04/07/05
Re:
My Separation from National Guard
Whcn I first moved to Susanville, California, I joincd the National Guard in I :eno. NV. For some
time, eveqlhing went well. There were some issues Lhat I had to ovcrcorne, md in doing so, I
volunr.dn.ly separated liom thc National Guard TIlc issues were both profess onal and personal in
nature.
With regards to tf~e professional issue, I had supervisors who Pvc1.e unaware c r ignorant to Lhc rules
and regulations governing time off for those in the reservcs and guard HOW ver, I lad to abide by
what these supervisors told to me. I \ms not always given time off to go to d iiI weekends.
As to Lhc personal issues. these were Inore intricate. I was going through sou .e kmilial issucs, a
divorcc and child custody issues. At one point, my daughter was laken from ler mother by lhe
Oregon CPS, and given to a foster funily. This was done, because "Mom" u 3s in jail, and the
person, with whom shc [eft my daughter, .rvas "unfit" All this was done with x ~ t my knowledge, ler
alone my consent, and at one point 1 had sued the Stale,o.f Oregon because oj their negligence.
When I lud custody of my daughter, I iud no one here %nth wl~orn I couId en; rust her, ilnd nly
supervisors at the guard had told me to, "bring ltcr with yon. We will all watt 11 her, atld she will
enjoy hersell" Nccdless lo saJ: I did not think too highly oftllis sbtemenl, a td1 chose not to put her
or myself into a position where any harm was possible.
Since this time, howvever, 1 have Merent supenisors, who are indeed aware 4 f rules and regulations
conmling h c soldiers and sailors act. Also, the issue with my daughter is nc w mool, in the salse
that she lives with her mothcr, and visitation is no longer a problem. I, LhereG Ire, %\till Iove the
opportunity to join tlic rcserva, and fulNl my obligation.
Zf you have any questions or need any documentation pertaining to Ule above, piease do no1 hsitate
to contact me al lhe address or plione number below. Thank you for your con idention
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00324
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00324 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00348
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00348 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change thc reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the recnlistment code. APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES (Please read instructions o n Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) APPLICANT DATA (The person w h o s e discharge is t o b e reviewed).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00101
I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I x I RECORD REVIEW I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL -..-.-..-..-..-..-..-. Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, I'X 781 50-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 SECRETARY OF THE AIR...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00417
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00417 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The Board concluded that characterization of the discharge received by the applicant to be appropriate.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00171
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I I MEMBER SITTING 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 ( BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDlTIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ( TAPE RECORDMG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I HEARING DATE 21 Oct 2004 CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00171 1 Case heard via video teleconference between...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00481
* Reason and Authority SAFIMRBK 550 C S T E C T WESI', SUI'TE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATlONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00481 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s and a Record of Individual Counseling for...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00083
- - - - AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI.) SIJITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 INDORSEMENT w DATE: 1 If 16J2006 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING,3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7w2 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 1 1 I 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00083 GENERAL:...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00356
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD N R E W S AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. - 0 8 SEP 2005 APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES (Please read instructions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) For this you received a Letter of Counseling, dated 07 Oct 91 (Attachment 4 ) .
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00173
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD TYPE GEN I @& '@sm$m YES No PERSONAL APPEARANCE I NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION I MEMBER SITTING ISSUES A94.05 HEARING DATE 1 12 Oct 2005 / Case heard at Washington, D.C. CASE NUMBER I FD-2005-00173 Ix 1 RECORDREVIEW I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL 1 I 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 3 4 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00127
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed Attachment; Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SSGT) 1. APPLICANT DATA /The person whose discharge is to be reviewed). For your actions, you were punished under Article 15, UCMJ on 24 Feb 05 consisting of reduction to the grade of...