-
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
I GRADE
AFSN/SSAN
PERSONAL. APPEARANCE
I
I RECORD REVIEW
I
A94.41
I
HEARING DATE
05 Feb 3004
I CASENUMBER
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
/ 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 1 LETTER OF NOTlFlCATlON
4
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I TAPE RECORDPJG OF PERSONAL APPERANCE
I
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FL.OOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
I
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
I
I
I
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
m-2003-00369
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant appeared without counsel before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) at Washington, D.C. on
February 5,2004.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant
substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justifL a change of discharge. The Board therefore
denies the requested relief.
ISSUE: The applicant raised 2 issues based on equity. First, he asserted that there was a change in Air
Force policy in relation to the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP), evidenced by a
memorandum fiom the Deputy Secretary of Defense, dated July 17, 2000, entitled Temporary Slowing and
Future Resumption of Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program. The applicant proposed that had this
memorandum been issued earlier, he would not have been required to obtain the vaccine. He explained that
he had concerns about the safety of the vaccine and that he realized that the order he was issued was a valid,
legal order. The applicant conceded that there was no impropriety in the processing of his case, including
with the order, the nonjudicial punishment, and the administrative discharge and subsequent resignation.
Second, he raised the issue that a general discharge is inequitable in this case given his otherwise meritorious
military service.
Evidence provided to the Board, including the sworn testimony of the applicant, established the following!
The applicant was given a written order to obtain the anthrax vaccine. He disobeyed that order and was
subsequently punished under Article 15 of the UCMJ. The applicant acknowledged that the AVIP was being
properly administered and that he was subject to the order to obtain the vaccine. The July 17, 2000
memorandum did not suspend the AVIP. Rather, it slowed down the pace of the AVIP due to a shortage of
vaccine. No evidence was presented that the anthrax vaccine lost its FDA approval or was unsafe. The
applicant conceded that between February and May 2000 he was afforded several opportunities to consult
with physicians and medical specialists. These professionals explained the risks of the vaccine and opined
that the benefits outweighed the risks. He also consulted with defense counsel. At the time the applicant
violated the order to obtain the anthrax vaccine he was aware that another officer fiom Dover AFB who had
previously refused to take the anthrax vaccine received nonjudicial punishment and a general discharge. The
applicant fully expected to receive the same treatment. Knowing this, he proceeded to violate the order.
Based on the foregoing, the Board found that there had not been a material change in policy and procedure
subsequent to the applicant's discharge so as to cast substantial doubt that the applicant would have received
the same discharge if relevant subsequent policies and procedures had been available to the applicant at the
time of his discharge.
The applicant relied on his performance reports to support his assertion that the requested relief is warranted
based on his service record. He testified that the only order he ever violated on active duty was the subject
order to obtain the anthrax vaccine. His Air Force record contains 2 officer performance reports and one
training report. These reports indicate that his service was excellent, consistent with his age, rank and level
of responsibility. The Board found no exceptional circumstances evidenced in his military record to warrant
the requested relief. The applicant willfully violated a lawful order of a superior commissioned officer,
while knowing the probable consequences of his actions. They found the seriousness of the willfbl
misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the
discharge was appropriate for the reasons that were the basis for this case.
The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of
discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former 1LT) (HGH 1LT)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recld a GEN Disch fr USAF 1 Sep 00 UP AFI 36-3207,
para 2.21 (Resignation). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 2 Aug 73. Enlmt Age: 19 4/12. Disch Age: 27 0/12. Educ: BS
Degree. AFQT: Unk. P-55, N-51, V-32, Q-59. AA-45. PAFSC: OllA2A - Operations
Airlift Pilot. DAS: 13 May 99.
b. Prior Sv: (1) USMCR 15 Dec 92 - 16 May 93 (5 months 2 days) (Inactive).
of which AMS is 4 months 22 days.
(2) Enlisted USMCR 17 May 93. Svd: 2 yrs 2 months 27 days,
all AMS.
( 3 ) AFROTC 14 Aug 95 - 15 May 97. Svd: 1 yr 9 months 1 day,
(4) AFRes 16 May 97 - 9 Jun 97 (24 days) (Inactive).
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Appt to 2LT & Ordered to EAD 10 Jun 97. Svd: 3 Yrs 2 Mo 22 Das, all
AMS .
b. Grade Status: 1LT - 28 May 99
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 15 May 00, McGuire AFB, NJ - Article 90. You, having
received a lawful command from Lt Col-
your superior commissioned officer, then known by
you to be your superior commisssioned officer, to have
yourself innoculated with the anthrax vaccination no
later than 10 May 00 at 1100 hours, or words to that
effect, did, on or about 10 May 00, at or near Dover
AFB, DE, willfully disobey the same. Forfeiture of
$605.00 pay per month for two months, and a reprimand.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: none.
g. Record of SV: 10 Jun 97 - 18 Dec 97 Dyess AFB MS (CRO)
13 Mar 99 - 12 Mar 00 Dover AFB MS (Annual)
(Discharged from Dover AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: NDSM, AFOUA, HSM, AFEMR, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (7) Yrs (8) Mos (18) Das
TAMS: (5) Yrs (4) Mos (17) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 30 Jul 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Memorandum, Temporary Slowing and Future Resumption of Anthrax Vaccine
Immunization Program (AVIP) , 17 Jul 00.
2. Memorandum, Reintroduction of the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program
3. Memorandum, Air Force Implementation of the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization
(AVIP), 28 Jun 02.
Program, 11 Oct 02.
4. Memorandum, Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program, 29 Apr 03.
5. DD Form 214.
6. Officer Performance Reports.
7. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (X as applicable) (Please p i n t name and social security number on each document.)
I WILL NOT BE SUBMITTED. PLEASE COMPLETE REVIEW BASED ON AVAILABLE SERVICE RECORDS
ARE LISTED BELOW AND ARE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION: (Continue on aplain sheet ofpaper ymOre Space is needed)
I
I
i
8.
ISSUES
The Board will consider any issue s u b m i i by you prior to dosing the case for deliberation. The Board also win review the case to determine whether them are any
issues that provide a basis for upgrading your discharge. However, the Board is not required to respond in writing to issues of concern to you unless those issues are listed U
incorporated by specific reference below. Carefully read the instructions that pertain to block 8 prior to completing this part of the application. If you need more space, Wbml
additional issues on an attachment
T.bel-t*t t ( l 4 ~hkc d ww Ik~Lnr is iMquihbIt UJ TRW rulvrdinr &+ urtnr d:&n# bc ~ d t d ) 1
r
I
7
L f a b k .
~ --r
- -
I PREVIOUSLY SUBMllTED AN APPLICATION ON (Enter date)
AND AM COMPLETING THIS FORM IN ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL ISSUES.
THE ABOVE ISSUES SUPERSEDE ALL PREVIOUSLY SUBMITED.
9. CERTIFICATION
I make Iha foregoing datenmts as part d my kpplication dlh MI k n m w g e d the -Hies
individual shall be f b d under this tile a inprisonad nd more than 5 yean, a bdh)
invdved (or wllhrlly making e Mse stat-nl
(U S.Ccde. Tala 18. Section 1001, pmvider that an
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division. St. Louis
AlTN: SFMR-RBRSL
9700 Page Avenue
St. LOU& MO 63132-5200
DD FORM 293, DEC 2000
Naval Council of Personnel Boards
Bldg. 36 - Washington Navy Yard
901 M Street, S.E.
Washington, DC 20374-5023
SAFIMIBR
550-c street west, Suite 40
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4742
Commandant (WPM-60)
U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters
Washington, DC 20593-0001
Page 2 of 2 Pages
I
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS TWENTY-FIRST AIR FORCE (AMC)
sth AIRLIFT SQUADROT
DOVER AFB, DE (AMC)
FROM: 2 1 AFICC
1907 East Arnold Avenue
McGuire AFB NJ 08641-5613
SUBJECT: Notification of Show Cause Action Initiated Under Am 36-3206, Chapter 3, Paragraph
3.6.4
1. I am initiating action against you under AFI 36-3206, chapter 3, paragraph 3.6.4 that requires you
to show cause for retention on active duty.
2. I am taking this action because you committed a serious offense under the Uniform Code of
Military Justice (UCMJ), specifically, Article 90. On or about 10 May 2000, you willfully disobeyed
the lawful command of your superior commiss~oned officer, Lt ~o1-b~
failing to
have yourself inoculated with the anthrax vaccination. As a result of this willful disobedience, you
rendered yourself unqualified for missions as a C-5 pilot. Prior to the issuance of this order, extensive
efforts were made to educate you regarding the safety, efficacy, and necessity of the anthrax vaccine.
Prior to the issua
the Flight Surgeon, Lt Col (Dr.)-
which was served on you by Co
ight Surgeons office. In addition, you were seen and
logist at Andrews AFB. You were also
Area Defense Counsel, Capt
AFICV, offered nonjudicial punishment,
, on 12 May 2000. You acknowledged
' your rights, waived your right to trial by court-martial, and accepted nonjudicial punishment on 12 May
2000. On 15 May 2000, Brig Ge-mposed
nonjudicial punishment on you, which included a
forfeiture of $605.00 pay per month for two months and a reprimand. You acknowledged receipt of
this action and your right to appeal on 17 May 2000. On 17 May 2000, you elected not to appeal the
punishment. The least favorable character of discharge that the Secretary of the Air Force may approve
in this case is under other than honorable conditions. Attached is a copy of documentary evidence
supporting this action.
.
3. Sign and date the attached indorsement acknowledging receipt of this notification memorandum. A
copy of the notification memorandum will be provided to you. If you decline to acknowledge receiving
this notification memorandum, the officer presenting it to you will indicate on it, the date and time that
you declined to acknowledge receiving it and it will be a part of your case file.
4. Familiarize yourself with AFI 36-3206, particularly the rights that you.have. If you do not apply for
retirement or request a resignation in lieu of further administrative action, a board, (an Air Force
Personnel Board, AFPB or Board of Inquiry, BOI) will convene as provided in chapter 6 or 7. Contact
your Area Defense Counsel,
19902, DS-
counsel, contact Capt : ...-..-..-..-..-.-..-..-.
Maingate Way, Dover AFB, DE, 19902-5520, DSN-
options.
Building 261, 3rd Floor, Dover AFB, DE,
to discuss the procedures involved and your rights and options. If you decline
........................
: Chief, Military Personnel Flight, 436 MSSQIDPM, 520
for counseling about your rights and
5. If you are entitled to elect to present matters to a BOI, the standard of proof used by the board to
make findings is' a preponderance of evidence. You may present evidence and argument to rebut the
reason set forth in this notification memorandum or any additional reason or information developed
during the BOI proceedings. You also may present other pertinent evidence.
6. Within 10 calendar days after you receive this notification memorandum, you must respond by
indorsement to me. If I do not receive the indorsement within the allotted time I will proceed with
further action under AFI 36-3206. Include in your indorsement:
a. Any statement you wish to submit on your own behalf andlor any additional evidence that you
wish me to consider. If you are unable to submit your statements or documentary evidence
within 10 calendar days after receiving this notification memorandum, you may request more
time as allowed under AFI 36-3206. Submit your request for additional time to the 21 AFICC.
If you do not submit statements or evidence, your failure will constitute a waiver of your right
to do so and I will refer your case to the BOI or AFPB.
b. A statement that your Area Defense Counsel, Captai
counseled you and
that you fully understand your nghts and options in this action. If you declined counsel, so state
and indicate that the Capt-Chief,
Military Personnel Flight, counseled you
and that you fully understand your rights and options in this action.
c. A statement that you understand the following regarding recoupment of education assistance,
special pay, or bonuses received if you haven't completed the period of active duty you agreed
to serve:
Recoupment of a portion of education assistance, special pay, or bonus monies received if
you voluntarily separate.
Recoupment of a portion of education assistance received if involuntary discharge is for
misconduct.
Recoupment of a portion of special pay or bonus monies received regardless of the basis for
involuntary discharge.
The.recoupment in all cases is an amount that bears the same ratio to the total amount or
cost provided to you as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of active
duty that you agreed to serve.
If you dispute that you are indebted for educational assistance, the BOI, or, if you do not
choose or are not entitled to a BOI, an authority appointed by the MAJCOWCC, will make
findings and recommendations concerning the validity of you indebtedness. See AFI 36-3206,
4.32 and 4.33, regarding special rules for recoupment.
d. A statement notifying me whether you intend to apply for retirement or tender your resignation.
If you have applied for retirement or tendered your resignation, attach a copy of the retirement
application or the resignation.
e. A statement that the area defense counsel or the chief, Military Personnel Flight, explained
separation pay to you and that you understand the eligibility criteria to receive separation pay.
f. Any other pertinent information.
7. In response to this notification memorandum, you may, within 10 calendar days, tender your
resignation under AFI 36-3207, chapter 2, section B, with the understanding that, if the Secretary of the
Air Force accepts your resignation, you may receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions
unless the Secretary of the Air Force determines that you should receive a discharge under honorable
conditions (general) or an honorable discharge.
If the Secretary of the Air Force accepts your
resignation, your discharge date will be as soon as possible but no later than 10 calendar days after the
date that the MPF receives separation instructions.
8. I have not taken action required under AFI 31-501. You may request excess leave if the Air
Force doesn't require your further participation in processing your case.
commander
Attachments:
1. Documentary Evidence:
a. Record of Non-Judicial Punishment Proceedings, AF Form 3070
b. 8 May 2000 Memorandum for 1 Lt
c. 18 May 1998 Memorandum for Secretaries of Military Departments: Implementation of the
Order
Anthrax Vaccination Program for the Total Force
d. 11 September 1998 Memorandum for Secretaries: Policy for Deviation from Anthrax Vaccine
Immunization Schedule
e. 30 March 1999 Memorandum for Secretaries: Change to Anthrax Vaccine Immunization
Program (AVIP)
f. 7 July 1998 Memorandum for ALMAJCOMICC: Air Force Anthrax Implementation Plan
g. 18 May 1999 Message: Anthrax Immunization Policy for AMC Personnel
h. DODDI 6205.2, Immunization Requirements, 9 October 1986
i. DODD 6205.3, DOD Immunization Program for Biological Warfare Defense, 26 November
1993
j. Air Force Joint Instruction 48- 1 10, Immunizations and Chemoprophylaxis, 1 November 1995
k. 1 March 1998 Air Force Anthrax Implementation Plan
2. AFI 36-3206
3. AFI 36-3207
4. 436 OGICC Recommendation for Action, 2 Jun 00
5. 1st Ind to 436 OGICC Recommendation for Action, 5 Jun 00
1" Ind (1 Lt
MEMORANDUM FOR 21 AFICC
"
I acknowledge receiving Notification of Show Cause Action Initiated Under
AFI 36-3206, chapter 3, paragraphs 3.2 and 3.6.4, from 21 AFICC with 4 attachments
at
hours on
2000.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00411
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Commander Attachments: 1.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00440
(attachment !we ! (Attachment 14). (Attachment 15).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00126
The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on April 10,2000) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. (Change Discharge to Honorable & Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issues: I was discharged with a General Discharge for refusing to participate in the Anthrax Vaccination Program. DEPARTMENT OF,THE AIR FORCE 16* COMMUNICATION SQUADRON (mTC) MEMORANDUM FOR A...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00206
AIR FOR( F DISCHARGE REVIEII BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WlhC, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMHKK ~D-2006-00206 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for u p ~ a d e of his discharge to honorable. Based on a full review of all information in the file, the Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case. A statement that Capt [---------- and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00203
On 15 February 2000, applicant submitted a personal letter of resignation in lieu of Discharge Review Board action (DRB) wherein he requested an honorable discharge. His rebuttal to the referral OPR, dated 25 May 2000, stated he refused the order to participate in AVIP because he considered it an illegal order as the anthrax vaccine was considered “experimental.” On 14 December 2000, the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) accepted his resignation in lieu of an administrative DRB and he was...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00172
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD BEARING RECORD ------ X NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE AB RECORD REVIEW C.-.-..-..-...I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSFL -.-.q.m.--.w rwE GEN $$"~@*~d~~~f%y YES No X MEMBER SITTING 1 I ORDER APPOINTTNG THE BOARD 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 4 COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDI'I'IONAL EXHIBITS SUBMI'II'EL) AT TIME...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0391
I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD02-039 1 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH SRA) 1. Attachments: Article 15, dtd 31 Jan 00.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00944
A federal court recently ruled that the AVIP violated United States law because the vaccine was considered investigational and it’s license was never finalized. They stated they would not take any further action on his request. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes the federal judge who issued the first injunction order has recently remanded the FDA’s Final Rule back to the FDA and has ordered a...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00380
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD . Attachments 1) Applicant DD Form 2 14 2) Applicant narrative describing background of events surrounding non-judicial punishments 3) AF Form 3070 (Article 15) 18 Oct 02 4) AF From 3070 (Article 15) 20 Apr 04 5) Brief on first issue of propriety - failure for leadership to send applicant to financial counseling 6) Brief on first issue of equity - applicant discharge was inconsistent with standards of discipline based on similiar conduct 7)...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00238
based upon thc record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's cl~aracterization for discharge inequitable. I was discharged by the Air Force for what they termed as "serious and recurring misconduct punishable by civilian or military authorities." As a prior enlisted member who became a commissioned officer, I am entitled to return to active duty as an enlisted member if I am discharged "Honorably" as an officer.