NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
( AFSNISSAN
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE A'ITACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIOHAL RATIONALE
I
I
I
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
I S I G N A T X O F BOARD P R E S I D E N ~
I
I
T WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
I
I
(EF-V2)
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
Previous edition will be used
I
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00440
I
!
!
I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
I
I The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. I
I
I FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the
applicant received a General Discharge for intentional or discreditable mismanagement of personal affairs
and recurring misconduct punishable by Military or civil authority. Over a period of seven years, applicant
was accused of and/or incarcerated for domestic disputes, aggravated assaults, (once with a firearm),
disorderly conduct, battery, and violating a no-contact order. Most of the applicantk issues center around his
Board of Inquiry and the accusation that his wife made false allegations. Applicant also states that the JAG
acted improperly during the investigation. The facts of the case are as follows: A Board Of Inquiry heard
evidence from a civilian police officer, applicant's estranged spouse, his son, members of the applicant's
squadron, and the applicant. The estranged spouse and child testified to numerous instances of violence or
threatened violence by applicant, associated with his excessive use of alcohol. Applicant's spouse also
provided evidence regarding violation of a n ~ o n t a c t order, issued by civilian and military authorities. The
case file was found to be legally sufficient. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the
applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct
was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the
discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The
DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of
recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willhl misconduct offset
any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was
appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former CAPT) (HGH CAPT)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr McConnell AFB, KS on 4 Nov 99
UP AFI 36-3206, para 3.6.2 & 3.6.4 (~ntentional or Discreditable Mismanagement of
Personal Affairs & Recurring Misconduct Punishable by Military or Civil
Authority). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 8 Nov 61. Enlmt Age: 19 0/12. Disch Age: 37 11/12. Educ:
Bachelor's Degree. A-58, E-78, G-76, M-94. PAFSC: KO11T3B - Tanker Instructor
Pilot. DAS: 30 Jun 94.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 4 Dec 80 - 6 Apr 81 (4 months 3 days)(Inactive).
(2) Enlisted as AB 7 Apr 81 for 4 yrs. Reenlisted as SrA 18
Feb 85 for 4 yrs. Reenlisted as SSgt 30 Apr 88 for 4 yrs. Svd: 7 yrs 9 months
20 days, all AMS. AMN - Unknown. A1C - Unknown. SrA - Unknown. SSgt - 1 Dec
85. APRs/EPRs: Unknown.
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Appointed to 2Lt & Ordered on EAD 27 Jan 89. Svd: 10 Yrs 9 Mo 8 Das,
all AMS.
b. Grade Status: Capt - 27 Jan 93
1Lt - 27 Jan 91
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: LOC, UNDATED - Domestic dispute (missing from file).
LOR, UNDATED - Aggravated assault with firearm against wife
and son (missing from file) .
18 APR 98-20 APR 98 - Incarcerated for violating a no
contact order and aggravated assault.
19 FEB 98 - Incarcerated for two counts of aggravated
assault.
08 MAR 97 - Disorderly conduct.
13 DEC 96 - Arrested for battery and disorderly conduct.
JAN 92 - Domestic abuse.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 17 Feb 90 - 06 Jan 91 Minot AFB YE (Semiannual)
07 Jan 91 - 06 Jan 92 Minot AFB YE (Annual)
07 Jan 92 - 06 Jan 93
07 Jan 93 - 01 Oct 93
02 Oct 93 - 27 Oct 94
28 Oct 94 - 13 Sep 95
14 Sep 95 - 31 May 96
01 Jun 96 - 31 May 97
01 Jun 97 - 31 Jan 98
01 Feb 98 - 31 Jan 99
01 Feb 99 - 14 Oct 99
Minot AFB YE
Minot AFB YE
McConnell AFB
McConnell AFB
McConnell AFB
McConnell AFB
McConnell AFB
McConnell AFB
McConnell AFB
(Annual )
( CRO
YE (Annual)
YE (CRO)
YE (CRO)
NE (Annual ) REF
YE (CRO)
NE (Annual) REF
YE (CRO)
h. Awards & Decs: AAF, AFCM W/2 OLCS, AFOUA W/VALOR DEV W/5 OLCS, CRM,
AFGCM W/1 OLC, NDSM, AFEM W/1 BS, SWASM W/1 BS, AFLSAR W/3 OLCS, SAEMR, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (18) Yrs (11) Mos (1) Das
TAMS: (18) Yrs (6) Mos (29) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 26 Oct 04
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
AFBCMR
-.--
-
-- - - - - -- -- -
The Administrative discharge I received fiom the USN; is in error and unjust for the
following rcasons:
of Inquiry at Mcconnell AFR, KS. (2-4 June 1999), my ex-wife,
estified falsely while under oath and in uniform to the botlrd. As
the governments key witness, she made many false allegations that influenced the
~ o a i d of Inquiry (HOT) in their decision to discharge mi afler 18 'A ycars of active
duty service. When my ex-wife testified, there was a valid court order in effcct that
specifically restrained hcr tiom harassment by contacting my workplace, yet she
volunteered to testify to effect my discharge (attachment 2, pg. 6). At the time of my
discharge, I wac embroiled in a hitter divorce. Every reason the military presented at
the BOI for my discharge was related to my failed marital relationship and not to duty
performance. Further, my legal counscl requested an investigation be conducted
rcgarding my ex-wife's testimony, but this was apparently ignored, as I received no
response or rcply (attachment 3). My counsel also requested that no processing action
be taken against myselfuntil these matters were addressed and resolved. AAer my
B01, I obtained evidence fiom a certified forensic handwriting analyst that confirmed
false testimony and perjury did in fact occur fiom my ex-wife (attachment 4). 'This
evidence was submitted to all reviewing authorities 1AW AFI 36-3206, and 1
requested in writing for the board to reverse its decision or reconvene (attachmcnt 5).
My military counscl also submitted letters of request to the revicwing authorities to
consider this evidence and reconsider (attachment 6). Contrary to AFI 36-3206, pg.
46-47,1 never received a response or reply, and this evidence was ignored. M'I 36-
3206 specifically requires that I receive a response with 10 calendar days to submit
comments or rebuttal. The first pagc of AFI 36-3206 states "Compliance With This
Publication Is Mandatory." While waiting for a response to this additional evidence, I
rcccived my discharge order via c-mail (attachment 7).
2.
Thc statement of reasons that initiated this administrative discharge was changed
several times. First, my cx-wife made false allegations that I was in arrears in child
support payments. This is the complaint that initiated my discharge action and was
ilem #1 on the initial statement of reasons (attachment 8). I obtained a court judgment
that specifically stated that I was never in arrears for child or spouse support
payments (attachment 9, pg. 3), and requestcd this discharge action be stopped
(attachment 10). As for reason #2, my commander, Lt. ~
d
is not career ending." I pled no contest LO a civilian charge on his words and trust.
Next. A new statement of reasons was issued, deleting th; initiating reason and
leaving the old reasons that had been previously resolvcd in the past (attachment 1 1).
During my €301, the statement of reasons were again changed for the convenience of
the board. This was done despite objections from my legal counsel relating to due
process.
me "this
o
o
l
l
3. , # do not believe the BOI considered thc impact of an administrative discharge after
18 years service LAW API 36-3207, pg. 13, and 10 U.S.C. 891 1 and the resulting
financialleconomic hardships from my total loss of benefits. In fact, 1 inquired liom
my frnancc ofice about the 15 yea. retirement option offcred at this time, but was
told it didn't apply to rated pilots, that 1 was a national asset and not eligible
regardless of my situation. Furthcr, T've received a letter liom HQ AFPC asking me
to apply for a civilian staffjob due to the current pilot shortagc (attachment 12). My
desire is reinswement to activc duty. I've been accountable and takcn full
responsibility for myself I do not blame aircrew turbulence, operations tempo or a
pilot shortage for my situation, however combined with a poor marital relationship,
these were certainly contributing factors. My cx-wife has been diagnosed with
Histrionic Personality Disorder, which was also a prevailing factor in the
dysfunctional marriage. I am not able to obtain
records, but her behavior was telling at the BOI
l
13). Further, my cx-wife stated in civil court that shc didn't realize and was ncver
informed that the ROi was a discharge board when she testified. My ex-wife had full
intention of destroying my career oul of her anger and vindictiveness.
!%!%!
(attachment
!we
!
l
sychiatric
igation. First, to illicit testimony from mTl1 year old son
trips to my sons residence, gave my son rides in his
convertible, a tour ofthc court mom, and invited my son ti) the legal office on his
career day at school, against my wishes. In fact, i requested that my son attend his
career day at my flight squadron, but was ignored by my cx-wife. This was very
wrong and I believe it's not ethical trying to turn a child against his father. I received
joint legal custody of my childrcn during my divorce.
5.
I made sevcral requests b ihe National Personnel Records Center for my board of
rcvicw transcript IAW B01 directions (pg. 6) and M I 36-3206, pg. 50. After several
months, I received a letter stating that there is no record of a board of review in my
records. (Attachment 14).
6.
I have the continued support of my squadron for reinstatement. My commander
and previous three commanders, as well as my pccrs, support my continued service.
(Attachment 15).
7.
I believe that all administrative appeals have been ;gnored or b u s t e d . After
contacting Scnator Wayne Nlard for assistance, I received correspondence advising
me to apply to the AFBCMR for reinstatement, since I was no longer on active duty
at that timc (attachment 16).
8.
I request reinstatement to active duty and allowed continuing service in the [JSAF.
T sacrificed 18 !4 years to my country, as evidenced in my pcrforrnance reports
(attachment 1 7). If all evidence was considered as stated above, and all instructions
were followed, T believe 1 would have been retained on activc duty. The catalyst for
this situation, a very dysfunctional marriage, is over. I believe the supporting
cvidence will warrant my reinstatement. 1 am certainly willing to appear beforc the
AFRCMR at my own expense. If you have any questions or need additional
information or documentation, please conta~? me.
Thank you very much for your consideration,
Very respectfully,
3.62, far intentional or d i d t a b l e mismanagement of pessonal affairs and pmapph 3.6.4, for
serious, reaming misconduct p\mishabIe by militaxy or civilIan authorities, as evidenced by the
following:
1.
bondby attempting to
~ x ~ d u ~ t
was also in
disorderly conduct
violent &c@
Police Dspartmrm subs@y
a dispute st his home over the
c-
4. On 13 k 9 6 at hishomeinDuby,Kansas,
City Prosecutor eventdl
resulted in the charges be
<+
6
L-PARTMENT OF THE AIR FORC'~. - *
HEAWUARTERS 220 AIR REFUELING wlrib (AMC)
MccOr
ELL AIR FORCEBASE K A N ~ s
.
$
2 2 JAN 1999
FROM: CC
SUBJECT: Notification of Action Initiated Under AFI 36-3206, Chapter 3, paragraphs 3.6.2 and
3.6.4.
1. I am initiating action against you under AFI 36-3206, Chapter 3, paragraphs 3.6.2 and 3.6.4.
2. I am taking this action in accordance with paragraph 3.6.2 because of your intentional or
discreditable mismanagement of personal affairs and in accordance with paragraph 3.6.4 because
of your serious, recumng misconduct punishable by military or civilian authorities. The
following specific incidents support both bases for discharge:
a. Between about 1 May 98 and about 13 Jan 99 you irresponsibly failed to remain current in
your court-ordered child support and spousal maintenance payments.
b. Between 18 Aur 98 and 20 Aor 98. at or near McConnell AFl3. Kansas. vou violated the
conditions ofyour bond, a district judge's "protection fiom abuse" order, an
[no contact" order by attempting to contact your wife by
a c t , your bond was revoked i n Apr 98 a& you were-incarcerated in Wichita,
Kansas, until 2 1 Ju198.
c. On 19 Feb 98, in Derby, Kansas, while intoxicated, you committed the following specific
acts of misconduct:
(1) You became violent during a dispute with your wife while your 11-year-old son and
9-year-old daughter were present. During this incident, you loudly berated your wife and son,
threw objects around the house, punched a hole in the wall with your fist, and broke a mirror with
your fist.
(2) You wrongfblly threatened to use physical violence against your wife and son.
(3) You threw a burning cigar at your son, striking him in the head.
(4) You retrieved your .45 caliber handgun from its carrying case, loaded a magazine into
it, and, in the presence of your wife and son, cocked the weapon while saying "lock and load"
several times, leading your wife and son reasonably to believe you intended to shoot them.
As a result of your misconduct on 19 Feb 98, you were arrested for aggravated assault and
incarcerated until 23 Feb 98. On 27 Jul98, you pled "no contest" to, and were convicted of, two
counts of felony aggravated assault against your wife and son. On 2 Sep 98 you were sentenced
to probation.
d. On 8 Mar 97, in Derby, Kansas, you became violent during an argument with your wife
over a cordless drill. For this misconduct, the Derby Police Department cited you for disorderly
conduct.
r a*
t
. -
.
e. On 13 Dec 96 in Derby, Kansas, you, while intoxicated, became violent and frightened your
family and a child who was ;isiting your home.
around your home. When your 10-year-old
you took the cordless phone from him, struck
couch and ripped the phone's base station from the wall. As a result of your misconduct on 13
Dec 96, you were arrested by Derby Police Department officers for battery and disorderly conduct
and were incarcerated at the Sedgwick County Detention Facility until 14 Dec 96.
to call the police,
threw him onto the
and threw objects
-
f In Jan 92 at Minot AFB, North Dakota, during a dispute with your wife,-
became violent and kicked down a door inside your home. For this misconduct,
-you
the security police detained you.
3. The least favorable character of discharge that the Secretary of the Air Force may approve in
this case under AFI 36-3206, paragraph 3.1 is under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC).
Attached are copies of documentary evidence to support this action.
4. Sign and date the attached memoranda of acknowledgment immediately upon receiving this
notification memorandum. Give one copy of the acknowledgment memorandum to me. If you
decline to acknowledge receiving this notification memorandum, I will note the date and time that
you declined to acknowledge receiving it. The notification and acknowledgment memoranda will
become a part of your case file.
5. Familiarize yourself with AFI 36-3206, particularly the rights you have and the actions the
MAJCOM may take on receipt of your reply to the action initiated. Contact the Ofice of the
Area Defense Counsel (ADC), Building 750, 53 155 Kansas Street, Suite 208, Mcconnell Air
Force Base, Kansas, 67221-3608; DSN 743-4375, Commercial (316) 652-4375, and you will be
assigned a military defense counsel. Your military defense counsel will, at no cost to you, discuss
the procedures involved and your rights and options. If you decline military counsel, you must
contact Capt Darlene Hudson, Chief, Military Personnel Flight (MPF), 22 MSSDPM, Building
795, McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas; DSN 743-376 1, commercial (3 16) 652-3761, for
counseling about your rights and options. If you do not take action or respond as specified in the
following paragraphs, the MAJCOM will proceed with hrther action under AFI 36-3206.
6. Within 10 calendar days after you receive this notification memorandum, indorse it, through
me, to HQ AMCDPPFQ, 100 Heritage Drive, Room 102, Scott AFB, Illinois, 62225-5002. The
W C O M will proceed with hrther action under AFI 36-3206 if I do not receive the indorsement
within the allotted time. Include in your indorsement:
a. A statement of whether you want to comment or submit documentary evidence that you
want considered in evaluating your case. Attach any statements or documentary evidence. If you
are unable to submit your statements or documentary evidence within 10 calendar days after
receiving this notification memorandum, you may request more time as allowed under AFI 36-
3206. If you have requested more time to respond to the action initiated, attach a copy of your
request.
b. A statement that your military defense counsel (identify him or her by full name and rank)
and options in this action. If you decline
counseled you and that you hlly
military counsel, so state and confirm that
counseled you and that you hlly
Chief, Military Personnel Flight,
options in this action.
c. A statement that you understand the following regarding recoupment of education
assistance, special pay, or bonuses received if you haven't completed the period of active duty
you agreed to serve:
Recoupment of a portion of education assistance, special pay, or bonus monies received
if you voluntarily separate.
Recoupment of a portion of education assistance received if involuntary discharge is for
misconduct.
Recoupment of a portion of special pay or bonus monies received regardless of the basis
for involuntary discharge.
The recoupment in all cases is an amount that bears the same ratio to the total amount or
cost provided to you as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of
active duty that you agreed to serve.
If you dispute that you are indebted for educational assistance, the board of inquiry, or,
if you do not choose or are not entitled to a board of inquiry, an authority appointed by
the MAJCOM, will make findings and recommendations concerning the validity of your
indebtedness. See AFI 36-3206, paragraph 4.37, regarding special rules for
recoupment .
d. A statement notifying me whether you intend to apply for retirement or tender your
resignation. If you have applied for retirement or tendered your resignation, attach a copy of the
retirement application or the resignation.
e. A statement that your military defense counsel or the Chief of the Military Personnel
Flight explained separation pay to you and that you understand the eligibility criteria to receive
separation pay.
7. In response to this notification memorandum, you may, within 10 calendar days, tender your
resignation to me under AFI 36-3207, Chapter 2, Section B, with the understanding that, if the
Secretary of the Air Force accepts your resignation, you may receive a discharge under honorable
conditions (general) unless the Secretary of the Air Force determines that you should receive an
honorable discharge. Ifthe Secretary of the Air Force accepts your resignation, your discharge
date will be as soon as possible but no later than 10 calendar days after the date that the MPF
receives separation instructions.
8. Actions required under AFI 3 1-501 are not applicable.
9. You may request excess leave if the Air Force does not require your hrther participation in
processing your case.
Attachments:
(Listed on Next Page -
la-lu, 2, 3, 4)
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00154
PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REMEW ROARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDIUWS ATB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE m V I E W BOA KI) DECISIONAL RAIIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2004-00154 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of thc discharge regulation and was within the...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00206
AIR FOR( F DISCHARGE REVIEII BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WlhC, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMHKK ~D-2006-00206 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for u p ~ a d e of his discharge to honorable. Based on a full review of all information in the file, the Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case. A statement that Capt [---------- and...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00269
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for violating a no contact order and for wrongfully communicating a threat to injure his wife. He also received a Letter of Reprimand for three nonmoving vehicle violations in one year, and a Record of Individual Counseling for leaving a toolbox unlocked overnight. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 29 May 03 (Change Discharge to Honorable, Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: After...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00411
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Commander Attachments: 1.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00065
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD er as NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL’ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON “GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x 4 x xX X }_ XxX ISSUES INDEX NUMBER : EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A93.09 A47.00, A49.00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD [> APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00454
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Specification: Did, at or near Fairchild AFB, WA and at or near AL Udeid Air Base, Qatar, on divers occasions, from on .-------------------- or about 1 Apr 03 to on or about 29 Aug 03, knowingly fraternize...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00380
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD . Attachments 1) Applicant DD Form 2 14 2) Applicant narrative describing background of events surrounding non-judicial punishments 3) AF Form 3070 (Article 15) 18 Oct 02 4) AF From 3070 (Article 15) 20 Apr 04 5) Brief on first issue of propriety - failure for leadership to send applicant to financial counseling 6) Brief on first issue of equity - applicant discharge was inconsistent with standards of discipline based on similiar conduct 7)...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0078
Because the Board did not recommend an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge, you do not have this option of directing this type of discharge. Considering all of the evidence in ommendation of the board, I recommend that you sign the attached letter directing tha discharged from the United States Air Force with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge pursuant to AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.1, without hrther probation and rehabilitation. The discharge board or, the...
In support of his request applicant provided a personal statement; his temporary divorce order; documents associated with his request for investigation into his ex-wife’s testimony and request to convene the BOR; his discharge directive; initial and amended statements of reason; child support court order; AFPC/DPCTD employment letter; his divorce attorney’s letter; character reference; NPRC response to his request for copies of his BOR; correspondence from his Senator’s office; and, his...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00369
At the time the applicant violated the order to obtain the anthrax vaccine he was aware that another officer fiom Dover AFB who had previously refused to take the anthrax vaccine received nonjudicial punishment and a general discharge. Memorandum, Air Force Implementation of the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization (AVIP), 28 Jun 02. ~ --r - - I PREVIOUSLY SUBMllTED AN APPLICATION ON (Enter date) AND AM COMPLETING THIS FORM IN ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL ISSUES.