Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00411
Original file (FD2005-00411.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied 
NAME OF SEHVIC:E: MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

GRADE 

AFSNISSAN 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

TYPE GEN 
CUUNSEL 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 

RECORD REVIEW 

X 
AULIRESS A N D  OR ORGANIZATION OF COLINSEL 

I 

I 

I 

MEMBER SITTING 

HON 

I 

VOTE OF THE BOARD 

I 

-u 

IIO'I.HC 

I  oTG I 

GLN 

DENY 

YES %I 

?A  

I v: 

I 

ISSl'ES 

A92.21 

ISDCY Sl'MBER 

A67.30 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

EXHIBITS SUB.MI7TED TO THE BOARD 

1  I  ORDER APPOWTMG T1 IC  BOARD 
2 
3 
4 

APPLICA'I'ION  FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
LE'I"I'LR OF NO'I'IFICA'I'ION 
BRIEF 01: PERSONNEL FILE 
COIINSkL,'S  RE1,EASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF--- 
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

HEARING DATE 

CASE NllMnER 

TAPE RECORDWG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

24 May 2006 
APPLICANT'S 

FD-2005-004 1 1 

ISSUE AND TW BOARD'S DEClSlONAC RATIONAL ARE DIICWSSFD ON THE ATTACHED AIR  IORC'I:  DISC HARGt REVIEW BOAlW VkrlSlONAL KAI IONALt 

Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to 
submit an application to the AFBCMR 
1  Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's  request. 

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '  

- 

WDORSEMENT 

F R O M  

SAFIMRUR 
550 C STREET WES'I', SUI'TG 40 
RANDOLPIl AFB, TX 78 150-4742 

DATE:  513012006 
.

.

.

.

 

.  .

... 

SECRETARY  O F T H E  AIR FOR(  C PCR40\\CI  (0(1N(  II 
AIR kC)I

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00206

    Original file (FD2006-00206.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FOR( F DISCHARGE REVIEII BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WlhC, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMHKK ~D-2006-00206 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for u p ~ a d e of his discharge to honorable. Based on a full review of all information in the file, the Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case. A statement that Capt [---------- and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00238

    Original file (FD2005-00238.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    based upon thc record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's cl~aracterization for discharge inequitable. I was discharged by the Air Force for what they termed as "serious and recurring misconduct punishable by civilian or military authorities." As a prior enlisted member who became a commissioned officer, I am entitled to return to active duty as an enlisted member if I am discharged "Honorably" as an officer.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00454

    Original file (FD2006-00454.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Specification: Did, at or near Fairchild AFB, WA and at or near AL Udeid Air Base, Qatar, on divers occasions, from on .-------------------- or about 1 Apr 03 to on or about 29 Aug 03, knowingly fraternize...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0460

    Original file (FD2002-0460.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0460 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a change of the reason and authority for the discharge. 1 am initiating action against you under AFI 36-3206, chapter 2, paragraphs 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 43.3, 2.3.4, and 2.3.5 that requires you to show cause for retention on active duty. Jn response to this notification memorandum, you may, within 10 calendar days, tender flour resignation under AF] 36-3207, chapter 2, section B, with...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00440

    Original file (FD2004-00440.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (attachment !we ! (Attachment 14). (Attachment 15).

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00292

    Original file (FD2003-00292.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (No appeal) (No mitigation) ( 3 ) 7 Jun 00, Barksdale AFB, LA - Article 92. (Change Discharge to Honorable) NO ISSUES SUBMITTED .- - ATCH None. (atch c); d. On or about 18 Apr 00, you failed to go to a mandatory appointment, as evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) dated 27 Apr 00 (atch d); e. On or about 20 ~~r 6, you failed to attend ii mandatory comniandt?~ call, as evid-enced / by an LOR dated 27 Apr 00 (at& d); f. On or about 2 1 Apr 00, you failed to pay your debt to American Cash...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00154

    Original file (FD2004-00154.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REMEW ROARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDIUWS ATB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE m V I E W BOA KI) DECISIONAL RAIIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2004-00154 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of thc discharge regulation and was within the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00076

    Original file (FD2003-00076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This was a one pound weight loss and four percent body fat gain from your previous (ita monthly weight evaluation on 26 Jun 96, constituting unsatisfactory progress on the [P. On 14 Aug 96, you acknowledged your weight and body fat percentage determined on 30 Jul 96, as evidenced by your signature on AF Form 393, Individual Record of Weight Management, at attachment 1. g. On 7 Oct 96, you weighed 240 pounds and your body fat percentage was determined to be JS? In response to this...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0418

    Original file (FD2002-0418.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She had two letters of admonishment for failure to go and late for work, one letter of counseling for failure to go, and one referral Officer Performance Report for unsatisfactory performance, The applicant complained that she was a victim of racial discrimination and harassment from her commander, and that she experienced retaliation after she exercised her right to make Military Equal Opportunity and Inspector General complaints against her commander. and SEE 3 me the understanding that...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00498

    Original file (FD2004-00498.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -- - - -- - DATE: 12/8/2005 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00498 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. I In view of the foregoing...