Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00434
Original file (FD2003-00434.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
---....-----....-----....-----....-- 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR 

SAFMRBR 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL 
AIR FORCEDISCXWRGE REVIEW BOAiW 
1535COMMAND D% EE WMG.3RD E L 0 0 8  
ANDREWS  MB, hm 10762-~002 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

L 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00020

    Original file (FD2006-00020.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. Based on the respondent's repeated acts of misconduct as listed in paragraph 3, an honorable discharge is not appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set forth above, I recommend the respondent be discharged from the United States Air Force under AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49, with a general discharge, without P&R.

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00043

    Original file (FD01-00043.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honor&e:- CASE NUMBER FDO1-00043 I . Two SSgt's and 1 Sgt., whose statements were submitted but not Issue 7: M y command abused it's authority when it decided to discharge me I was told by my commanding lieutenant an decided' to give me a bad discharge. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct - - Minor Disciplinary Infractions.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00057

    Original file (FD2005-00057.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TO: I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00057 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0495

    Original file (FD2002-0495.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING REC:OHU .- . ., Sk:R\'l(. 'k: XIKXIBEH (l..AS'r.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9700392

    Original file (9700392.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Office of Personnel Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPAES reviewed this appeal and states that applicant should have been extended from 9 April 1996 to 30 January 1998. Instead, he should be extended beginning 10 April 1996 and ending on 30 January 1998, compensated as discussed in the advisory opinion (with no pay for the period 7 June to 11 July 1996) , and allowed to extend for one promotion cycle beyond his projected HYT date. He received no pay and allowances...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00431

    Original file (FD2005-00431.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    thus the applicant's discharge should not be changcd. d. Art 15's: (1) 13 Jun 03, Minot AFB, ND - Article 134. (Atch 4-5) c. You, who knew of your duties at or near Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, on or about 5 Apr 03, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain from consuming alcohol while under the age of twenty-one years of age, as it was your duty to do, You were punished under Article 15 of the UCMJ on 1 May 03 and a UIF was established.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00530-01

    Original file (00530-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this connection, the Board substantially The Board will reconsider your request for the Air Medal if the 1650/3 and plane commander completes the attached OPNAV Form submits it to the Board of Decorations and Medals. Regulations that govern submission of an official recommendation require that the recommendation be signed by an "officer senior to the person being recommended. 20350-2000 NAV Y N S IN REPLY REFER TO 09B13/1U518366 Ser 29 August 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chief of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9703665

    Original file (9703665.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Requested Action: hi8 retired pay be cor retired list.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00216

    Original file (FD2006-00216.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFllQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE L A 3 L NLIMDLK FD-2006-00216 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. A copy of AFI 363208, is available for your use in the 365 TRS Commander's Support Staff. For this misconduct, he received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, on 14 Feb 06. a.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00443

    Original file (FD2005-00443.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Discharge to Honorable) NO ISSUES SUBMITTED. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct: Drug Abuse. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.