DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
ELP
Docket No. 530-01
7 January 2002
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
considered your application on
Your allegations of error and injustice were
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
3 January 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
and policies.
opinions furnished by the Board of Decorations and Medals in the
Office of the Chief of Naval Operations
(N09B13), dated 29 May
and 29 August 2001, copies of which are enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
In this connection, the Board substantially
The Board will reconsider your request for the Air Medal if the
1650/3 and
plane commander completes the attached OPNAV Form
submits it to the Board of Decorations and Medals.
recommendation that you receive the award is denied.
His
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
You are entitled to have
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosures
DEPARTMENT OF THE
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000
NAV Y
N
S
IN REPLY REFER
09B13/1U517091
TO
Ser
29 May 2001
From:
To:
Chief of Naval Operations
Chairman, Board for
(N09B13)
Correlation of Naval 'Records
Subj:
REQUEST FOR COMM
F
Ref:
(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
(2) Service Record
(3) OPNAV
1650/3
As requested by reference (a),
1.
for comments and recommendations
Flying Cross and the Air Medal for
enclosures (1) and (2) have been reviewed
concernina eliaibilitv for the Distinauished
Our records fail to show that
2.
Distinguished Flying Cross or the
copy of his flight log book of combat missions flown,
the documents and make an eligibility determination in
him indicate each combat mission by an "X".
complete and flight codes and/or remarks section provide the necessary
information that we are governed by in determining the number of combat
missions to count towards the awarding of the Air Medal/Distinguished Flying
1; addition, we request he include his full name, service number,
Cross.
rank, and the names of all squadrons (spelled out) in the log book. He
should submit the information to the Chief of Naval Operations
Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000.
we'will gladly review
hi; case.
Log entries must be legible,
d for
would submit a
(N09B13), 2000
Please have
the.
Under Section 526 of the FY 96 DAA and Title 10 USC, Section 1130, award
However,
3.
recommendations can be reviewed without regard to time limitations.
determination under the above sections regarding the award must be made in
accordance with the same procedures that apply to the approval or disapproval
of the award in a timely manner as prescribed by law or regulation.
Regulations that govern submission of an official recommendation require that
the recommendation be signed by an "officer senior to the person being
recommended.
I have enclosed a blank' OPNAV
1650/3 form (enclosure (3)). If
can find a senior officer who has personal knowledge of his
actions and is willing to sign the form (completed on front and back and a
proposed citation), we will reconsider his request for the Air Medal (Single
Mission action).
4.
Enclosures
(1) and (2) are returned.
By direction
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Concord,
Calif.
001
LCDR (Serial N
ist--USNR
Board for
Washington D.C.
20370-5100
CorrectiAg Naval Records, Navy Annex,
Head, Discharge Review Section,
(1) Letter dated 29 May 2001,
Operations, by
fromchief of Naval
09B13/1U517091)
(Ser
Head, Discharge Review Section, Board for correction
of Naval Records, Docket No. 530-01
during a flight in the South Atlantic
Squadron VP 211) on February
14,1944.
( Fleet Air Wing 11,
PBM aircraft,
6634),which was involved in
2. I was the Patrol Plane Commander (PPC) of rhe
Bureau No.
on the
4 February 1944, and described b
in his
1
detailed correspondence to Chief
ns, your
department and perhaps other departments of the Navy, about
this matter.
think about the events of that day.
about this flight and his actions are accurate as far as I can
remember
3.
an
was our First Ordinanceman in the crew
rew for about 17 months.
I distinctly remember this flight and often
The statement of facts
4. I strongly suggest and recommend
awarded an Air Medal or other appropriate
on 14 February 1944.
award for his actions
be
5.
Thank you for, your consideration.
Sincerely,
copy
t o :
DEPARTMENT OF THE
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
WASHINGTON. O.C. 20350-2000
NAV Y
N
S
IN REPLY REFER TO
09B13/1U518366
Ser
29 August 2001
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Chief of Naval Operations
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
(N09B13)
E O
(a) Your ltr AEG Docket
#530-01 of 16 Jul 01
, USN (Ret.) of 6 Jul 01
(1) Ltr by
(2) Your ltr AEG:jdh Docket No: 530-01 of 15 Jun 01
(3) My ltr Ser
w/encl
(4) BCNR File
(5) Service Record
(6) OPNAV Form
09B13/1U517091 of 29 May 01
1650/3
1.
As requested by reference (a),
enclosur
or further comments in support of
eligibility for the Distinguished
the
.) does not
As submitted, the letter of
recommen
1650/3 previous1
2.
constitute an official
the OPNAV Form
be completed with a proposed citation for
on 14 February 1944.
of missions; therefore,
The information submitted covers a
it is currently unclear whether this
series
quest is just for an Air Medal
actions on 14 February 1944 or whether
(Single/mission
still seeking consideration for Distinguished Flying Cross
and Air Medal (AM) for the combat missions he flew during World
War II.
required docum
_ with a copy of
We must be provided
flight log book of combat missions
As such, his case cannot be processed until the
een submitted.
DX/AM. If
flown before we can make a determination for his entitlement to
.flight log book is not available,
the
we will accept a copy of his Plane Commander's flight log book
provided the Plane Commander certifies those flights which-
- participated in
.
We are forwarding another blank OPNAV Form
3.
1650/3 to be
completed and returned with a summary of action (block 25) and
a
Upon receipt of
proposed citation for the recommended award.
required documentation, the recommendation will be submitted to
an upcoming Awards Board for consideration of the Air Medal.
If there are any questions with respect to the
4.
requirements, our office may be contacted on (202) 685-1770.
5.
Enclosures (1) through (5) are returned.
B. A. WILSON
FG
-Awafd,ng
Aulhontyj ADDRESS
UK/R= --
~-
COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESSES
ACQUIRED
14
EXf’ OF ACTIVE DUTY
---_____
if-P IF RETIREMENT/SEPARATION, NUMBER OF YEARS
DESlGlNEClMOS
15 EST DETACHMENT DATE
ADDRESS
COMMAND POC
1 SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
3 NAME (Last.
first.
M/J
4 COMPONENT (USN. USMC,
)efc
PHONE
2
16
NEW DUTY STATION (Home address
rf
separatmn
anhopafed)
-
cl RETIREMENT
c l TRANSFER
0 TERMINAL LEA
5. GRADE/RATE
I
17 UNIT AT TIME OF ACTION/SERVICE
18 DUTY ASSIGNMENT
6. WARFARE DESIGNATOR
7
UIC/RUC.
19 PREVIOUS PERSONAL DECORATIONS AND PERIOD
ADDRESS
RECOGNIZED (exclude Purple
Hearl and Combat
Actmn Ribbon)
8. RECOMMENDED AWARD
(see
mswudron
#3 on
back)
9 SPECIFIC ACHIEVEMENT
0 YES q NO
HEROlCYl
0
T:::;s
clPoKzJ”s
0
LE%z:uu: q
M’A
11. NUMBER OF AWARD OF RECOMMENDED MEDAL
20 PERSONAL AWARDS RECOMMENDED-NOT YET APPROVED
12. ACTION DATE/MERITORIOUS PERIOD
21. OTHER PERSONNEL BEING RECOMMENDED FOR SAME
ACTIC
13. GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF ACTION/SERVICE
22.
I certify that the facts contained
an the summary of
action are
I
NAME, GRADE, TITLE OF ORIGINATOR
SIGNATURE
a
known to me
c l
a
matter of record
DATE
23. FORWARDING ENDORSEMENTS BY VIA ADDRESSEE(S).
(Affach
addrtional sheets
RECOMMENDED
COMBAT
AWARD
’
“Lr
cl
cl
c l
YES
No
YES
cl
No
cl . YES
No0
COMBAT
‘V
c l YES
0 N O
EXTRAORDINARY
HEROISM
RECOMMENDED
0 YES
0 NO
3
24. TO BE COMPLETED BY AWARDING A
DlSPOSlTlONOFBASlC
RECOMMENDATION
on/v as
necessarv)
SIGNATURE, GRADE
DATE
FWD
I
‘SIGNATURE, GRADE, TITLE
DATE
APPROVED
FOR USE OF NDBDM ONLY
FROM: SECNAV (NDBDM)
TO:
CNO
ExtmMdinaty
1.
2. Reviewed
OPNAV
(N09B33) CMC (CODE MHM)
heroism recommended
andrecorded
165013 (Rev l-64)
0 YES
,
0 NO
DATE:
Bv
$&e&ion
0 NA
6/N
0107-LF417-6666
1 Before
completrng
lhrs form see
SECNAV
IST
IF
1650
._
l
3 Two
(2) letter codes
to be used
MH
- Meda
r
l of Hono
- Navy C
NX
ross
- Disbngu
DM
rshed Se
rvrce Meda
SS Silver Star
-
Legton
LM
-
LV
Leg
ion
- OX
Distrngurshed
lying Cross with V
DV
- Distrngurshed F
of
of Merit with V
rn blocks 8
. 19. 20, 23, and 24
Merit
Flying Cross
Marine
8
- Navy
NM
BS Bronze S
tar
_ Bronze S
tar with V
BV
- Purple Hea
l
rt Meda
PH
- Meritorious Servrce Meda
l
MM
- Air Meda
l
AS
-
Atr Meda
l
AF
- Air Meda
l
AH
- Strike/Flight
- Individual Action
- Individua
l Action with V
__~__
INSTRUCTIONS
2 The Su
mmary of
approved NAMS)
l
Corps Meda
~-~--
__~.
~~
--~
-~
(item 24
)
Actton
In add
ition
IS reques
ted
(excep
t
le
doub
attach a
for Command
crtatton
spaced p
roposed
-
Servrce
Joint
JC
- Navy Co
mmenda
tron Meda
l
NC
- Navy Co
tron Meda
mmenda
l
CV
- Joint
Servtce
JA
- Navy Ach
ievement Meda
l
NA
_ Navy Ach
ievement Meda
l
NV
- Combat
CR
l
Commenda
tron Meda
Achrevement
V
wrth
Meda
l
with
V
Action
Rtbbon
1
25 SUMMARY OF ACTION (not required for Command approved NAMS)
OPNAV
166013 (Rev. l-64)
(Back)
!..!
_:
‘.S.
QOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:
1994-504-079~97
4
DEPARTMENT OF
THE NAVY
BOARD FOR
CORRECTIW OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
Docket
AEG
#530-01
16 July 2001
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Chief of Naval Operations (Code
OP09B33)
R COMMENTS IN THE CASE OF
(a) My ltr. of
It
(b) Your
(c) Ltr. of
20FebOl
(Ret) of
6JulOl
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
(2) Service Records.
1. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in
Subject's case.
relief be granted.
officer with personal knowledge of Subject's actions would
complete and sign an OPNAV
Subject's request.
However, you also stated that if a senior
You replied by reference (b) and recommended no
1650/3 form, you would reconsider
2. No such form has been received.
However, reference (c) has
now been submitted on Subject's behalf by the patrol plane
commander, who states that he recalls the incident at issue and
Subject's version of events is correct.
3 . Accordingly, the case is returned to you for further action or
additional comments and recommendations
YL as you deem appropriate.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01105-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 1105-01 20 September 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02997-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO dated 27 December 200 which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board 1, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting approval of your request to award you the Purple Heart Medal. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 IN REPLY REFER T...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00204-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. In this connection, the Board substantially Further, an individual could have no mark below 3.0 The names Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00549-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03551-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 3551-00 25 September 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction-of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. considered your application on 25 Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, September...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05613-05
As requested in reference (a), the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals (NDBDM) has reviewed petition to award her father, (deceased), a Navy and Marine Corps Medal for his actions on November 7, 1944.2.There is no evidence an award recommendation has previouslybeen submitted for and the material presented is insufficient to consider an award for him at this time. Also required is a properly completed Personal Award Recommendation Form, OPNAV 1650/3, a copy of which is provided...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07440-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 S CRS Docket No: 7440-00 5 December 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 30 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. Naval Operations has reviewed subject man's case for eligibility determination for the Purple...
He also completed three missions as a B-17F navigator. During World War II, the 8th Air Force had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 30 combat flight missions and an AM was awarded upon the completion of five missions. In 1944, the 8th Air Force required completion of 30 combat flight missions; however, the applicant did not complete 30 missions.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01945-01
He also stated that a member could bank time from other commands because flight time was flight time, no matter where a member flew. e to my office to look over Master Chief inal documentation ere was no way possible tha a as Fr To Subj: LIGHT RECORDS After reviewing subject members NATOPS Jacket and Service 1. In this case, the reporting senior made it clear in block-42 Comments on Performance, the reason for preparing the report as he did.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Awards and Decorations Section, AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed the application and states that applicant, along with all crew members who flew evacuation flights, received the Air Medal in recognition for their meritorious achievement. We recognize the periods of these awards will overlap; however, since the Air Medal was awarded for flights in C-46 and C-47 cargo aircraft and the award of Soldier’s Medal is recommended based on voluntary mercy missions flown in L-4J...