Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00031
Original file (FD2003-00031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

____*l_i 
I 
TYPE 

IX 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

NAME OW  COUNSEL AND OR O R G W  

GRADE 

A1C 
/ 

AFSNISSAN 

RECORD REVIEW 

2 
3 
4 

I 

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 
BREF OF PERSONNEL FILE 
COUNSEL'S  RELEASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDlTIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF 
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

TAPE RECORLXNG OF PERSONAL APPERANCE 

I Caw heard at h d o l p h  AFB, Texas. 

*Change reason and authority to Secretarial Authority. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board. 

SAEIMRBR 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 

I 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

SECRETAEY OF TBE AIRPORCE FXRSONNELCOUTCU 
NXEORCEDISCB*RGE R E m W  BOARD 
1535 COMMAND DR, EE W G .  3RD XLOOR 
ANDREWS *FB,MD 20762-7OW 

I 
(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

I 

I 
I 

I 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00046

    Original file (FD2006-00046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recfd a BCD Disch fr USAF McConnell AFB, KS on 27 Feb 91 UP SPCM Order # 2 , 11 Feb 91. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SSgt 13 Jan 85 for 6 years Svd: 06 Yrs 01 Mo 15 Das, all AMS .

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00073

    Original file (FD2003-00073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD03-0073 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. DAS: 20 Jan 87. b , Prior S v : (1) AFRes 8 Feb 86 - 14 Aug 8 6 ( 6 Months 7 Days) (Inactive).

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00057

    Original file (FD2005-00057.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TO: I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00057 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00071

    Original file (FD2004-00071.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AYB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00071 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge was inequitable because it was based on a single isolated incident. I am recommending your discharge from t h e United States A i r...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00413

    Original file (FD2006-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ............................ A - - - ------a - - 1'YPE UOTH PERSONAL APPEARANCE , GRADE A1 C X APSNRSAN I ----------------- . 3RD FLOOR ANUREWS AFB, MD 20761-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATIONALE C4SE NlJMEER FD-2006-00413 GENERAL: The applicant appeals fbr upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00102

    Original file (FD2005-00102.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -- I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. He contends that his commander at the time of discharge stated he believed applicant was deserving of an Honorable Discharge but was directed to offer him a General Discharge, that at the Administrative Discharge Board, his commander testified that he should have an Honorable Discharge (applicant later changed his issue to state that his commander's testimony was that he should receive a General Discharge),...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00406

    Original file (FD2006-00406.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issues: My discharge was inequitable because it was an isolated incident. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 91/07/17 for 4 yrs. Copies of t h e documents t o be forwarded t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y i n support o f t h i s recommendation a r e attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00152

    Original file (FD2005-00152.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 07 Dec 2005 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TXE BOARD'S DECISKlNAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2005-00152 I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used i i AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2001-0348

    Original file (FD2001-0348.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    /$NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) I GRADE ( AFSNISSAN I MEMBER SITTING 1 VOTE OF THE BOARD HON I GEN 1 UOTHC OTHER I DENY 3 ................................. ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 HEARING DATE 03 Jun 2004 CASE NUMBER FD-2001-0348 Case heard at Washington, D.C. X 1 2 3 4 EXHBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00141

    Original file (FD2004-00141.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES: Applicant was recommended for discharge based on both drug abuse and misconduct; the records indicated the applicant received five Letters of Counseling (LOCs) for being late to work, and a commander- directed urinalysis was returned positive for the presence of cocaine. Member exercised his right to an administrative discharge board and the board found that member was late to work five times and did wrongfully use cocaine. SrA-(APR Indicates): 14 Jun 85-21 Dec 85.