1 KAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
-
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
-
1 GRADE
TYPE GEN
, -
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
AlC
RECORD REVIEW
X
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL
No
X
MEMBER SITTING
,- +-
A WTEVF '~$EBOA@
"'5 , !
HON
GEN
UOTHC
OTHER
DENY
CffDBSISt?L
YES
-
-
-
I
-
F1"' A93.09
INDEX NUhlBEH
A94.05
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
X
X
X
X
X
I
1 1
1 2
1 3
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
. . . . . . . -
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
1
07 Dec 2005
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TXE BOARD'S DECISKlNAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
FD-2005-00152
I
I
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
S I G N A T U ~ C O R D F R
I SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT
T WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742
I
RY O F THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
AND DR. EE WING. 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB. MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
i
i
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2005-00152
I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
I The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
I FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant does not contest his discharge. He states that he made some bad decisions concerning his
personal life of which both he and his family paid a heavy price. The records indicated the applicant
received three Article 15s for writing bad checks, being found drunk on duty, failure to go and DWI. The
DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his
negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected
of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be
appropriate.
Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The
DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of
recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset
any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was
appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with thc
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of thc
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
I In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis fo
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AlC) (HGH TSGT)
1. MATTER UNDER REWIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr George AFB, CA on 23 Jun 92
UP AFR 39-10, para 5-47a (Pattern of Misconduct - Discreditable Involvement With
Military Authorities). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 28 Nov 54. Enlmt Age: 22 9/12. Disch Age: 37 6/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-79, E-41, G-50, M-74. PAFSC: 45255 - Tactical and ~lectrical
Environmental Systems Specialist. DAS: 18 May 91.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 20 Sep 77 - 20 Dec 77 (3 months 1 day)(Inactive).
(2) Enlisted as AB 21 Dec 77 for 4 yrs. Reenlisted as SrA 30
Dec 80 for 6 yrs. Svd: 8 yrs 1 month 6 days, all AMS. AMN-(APR Indicates): 21
Dec 77-23 Jun 78. A1C-(APR Indicates): 23 Dec 78-22 Dec 79. SrA - 1 Sep 80.
Sgt - 1 Nov 81. SSgt - 1 Apr 83. APRs: 8,8,8,9,9,9,9,9,9,9.
3 . SERVICE UNDER REWIEW:
a. Reenlisted as SSgt 28 Jan 86 for 6 yrs. Extended 27 Feb 90 for 21
months. Svd: 6 Yrs 4 Mo 26 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A1C - 03 Apr 92 (Article 15, 03 Apr 92)
SrA - 20 Mar 92 (Article 15, 20 Mar 92)
SSgt - 06 Aug 90 (vacation of Article 15, 5 Nov 90)
TSgt - 01 Dec 89
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 03 Apr 92, George AFB, CA - Article 111. You, did, on
or about 14 Mar 92, on Nevada Street near the Temporary
Lodging Facilities, operate a vehicle, to wit: a
passenger car, while drunk with a blood alcohol content
of .220 g/dl. Reduction to A1C. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
(2) 20 Mar 92, George AFB, CA - Article 112. You, were, on
or about 28 Feb 92, found drunk while on duty as an
Electro-Environmental System Specialist. Article 86.
You, did, on or about 28 Feb 92, without authority, go
from your appointed place of duty. Reduction to SrA,
and 7 days extra duty. (No appeal) (NO mitigation)
(3) 5 Nov 90, Vacation, Spangdahlem AB, Germany - Article
134. In that you did, within the Federal Republic of
Germany, on divers occasions from on or about 5 Aug 90
to on or about 18 Aug 90, make and utter to the Bitburg
AB Accounting and Finance Office, drafts numbered 556,
558, and 560, for a total of one hundred fifty-seven
dollars and fourty-four cents ($157.44), more or less,
for the purpose of obtaining lawful currency or other
things of value, and did thereafter dishonorably fail to
maintain sufficient funds in your account with the
Service Federal Credit Union for payment of such drafts
in full upon their presentment for payment. Reduction
to SSgt. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
(4) 6 Aug 90, Spangdalem AB, Germany - Article 134. In
that you, being indebted to the German Bundespost in the
sum of about DM 1442,03 for telephone fees, which amount
became due and payable on or about 22 Jun 89, did,
within the Federal Republic of Germany, from on or about
22 Jun 89 to on or about 26 Jun 90, dishonorably fail to
pay said debt. Suspended reduction to SSgt. Fourteen
days extra duty. (,No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 06 FEB 92 - Failure to pay just debt.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 12 Nov 85 - 11 Nov 86 Cannon AFB
9 (Annual)
12 Nov 86 - 16 Aug 87 Cannon AFB
9 (CRO)
17 Aug 87 - 01 Jun 88 Spangdahlem AB 9 (CRO)
02 Jun 88 - 01 Jun 89 Spangdahlem AB 9 (Annual)
02 Jun 89 - 01 Jun 90 Spangdahlem AB 3 (Annua1)REF
02 Jun 90 - 29 Oct 91 George AFB
5 (Annual)
h. Awards & Decs: NDSM, AFTR, AFGCM W/2 OLCS, AFOUA W/1 OLC, SAEMR,
AFOSSTR, AFLSAR W/2 OLCS, AFOSLTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (14) Yrs (9) Mos (4) Das
TAMS: (14) Yrs (6) Mos (3) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 07 Apr 05
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
I spent 14 years 6 month ands days in the ZlnitedStatesPir Force and
lbvedevery minute of it, unfortunate4 lbte in my career I made some 6ad
decisions concerning my personal life of which 60th myseyandmy fami4
paida heayy price. Since that time I have managedto straighten out my
personalCife andcontinuedon in the civilian aviation iditry wore% and
supenrising ~vionics/!lkctricalshops doing modifrcatwn for 6ot h civilian
andgovernment agencies. I thinka6out what it wouHhave been Like to
have complktedmy twenty or even more. When I readabout so&rs hnying
to diendour country, going as far as to tat@ d q s to t@ep+om 6eing
deplbyed it sict@ns me, especialt when I'dhavegone if1 were a s k d What
~ ' m
the fami4 a d a l w a y s wiTi I have a daughter on active duty nght now
U S f l I don't want privilges or anything of the sort, i@t want my
d-ischarge paper wo&to reflkt what I didon the jo6 an honora6lk job
twenty fourseven for 14 years 6 month adthree days, never wavering
never whining andnever in general t e r n . Atjii. years of age I'dget up
andgo at a moments notice i f it were possi6lk! Whateveryour decision I'll
always 6lked6lue!!!fian& for taeng the time to readthis comespodence.
trying to say is I lin,ekthe military a n d l stiEconnder myseya part of
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 35th FIGHTER WING
GEORGE AIR FORCE BASE, CA. 92394-5000
REPLY TO
A m O F :
SUNEcT:
35 AGS/CC
L e t t e r of N o t i f i c a t i o n - Board Hearing
15 Apr 92
1.
I am recommending your discharge from t h e United S t a t e s A i r Force f o r
Misconduct - D i s c r e d i t a b l e Involvement w i t h M i l i t a r y A u t h o r i t i e s ,
according t o AFR 39-10, under t h e p r o v i s i o n s of paragraph 5-47a. Copies
of t h e documents t o be forwarded t o t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y t o support
t h i s recommendation a r e attached.
2. My reasons f o r t h i s a c t i o n a r e :
a. You d i d , on o r about 14 Mar 92, operate a v e h i c l e while drunk
w i t h a blood alcohol content of
d a t e d 3 Apr 92.
.220 g / d l , a s evidenced by an A r t i c l e 15
b.
YOU were, on o r about 28 Feb 92,. found drunk while on duty a s an
Electro-Environmental Systems S p e c i a l i s t , f u r t h e r , you did, on o r about
28 Feb 92, without a u t h o r i t y , go from your appointed p l a c e of duty, a s
evidenced by an A r t i c l e 15 dated 20 Mar 92.
c. You did, on o r about 6 Feb 92, f a i l t o pay a j u s t debt owed by
you i n t h e amount of $503.15 t o t h e George AFB NCO Club, a s evidenced by
a L e t t e r of Reprimand dated 6 Feb 92.
i
d. You did, between on o r about 5 Aug 90 and 18 Aug 90, on d i v e r s
occasions make and u t t e r p e r s o n a l checks f o r a t o t a l of $157.44, more o r
l e s s , f o r t h e purpose of o b t a i n i n g l a w f u l currency o r o t h e r t h i n g s of
v a l u e w i t h i n s u f f i c i e n t funds i n your account t o cover s a i d checks, a s
evidenced by a Record of Proceedings oE Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial
Punishment dated 20 Nov 90.
e. You d i d , between on o r about 22 Jun 89 and 26 Jun 90,
dishonorably f a i l t o pay a d e b t owed t o t h e German Bundespost i n t h e sum
of about DM 1442,03 f o r telephone f e e s , a s evidenced by an A r t i c l e 457
d a t e d 6 Aug 90.
3. This a c t i o n could r e s u l t i n your s e p a r a t i o n with a Under Other Than
Honorable Conditions discharge. I am recommending t h a t you r e c e i v e an
Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. The commander
e x e r c i s i n g SPCN j u r i s d i c t i o n o r a h i g h e r a u t h o r i t y w i l l make t h e f i n a l
I f you a r e discharged, you w i l l be i n e l i g i b l e
d e c i s i o n i n t h i s matter.
f o r r e e n l i s t m e n t i n t h e A i r -Force.
4. You have t h e r i g h t t o :
a. Consult l e g a l counsel.
b. Present your case t o an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board.
c. Be represented by l e g a l counsel a t a board hearing.
d. Submit statements i n your o h behalf i n a d d i t i o n t o , o r i n l i e u
o f , t h e board hearing.
e. Waive t h e above r i g h t s . You must c o n s u l t l e g a l counsel b e f o r e
mak-kng a d e c i s i o n t o waive any of your r i g h t s .
5. You w i l l have a medical examination a t t h e USAF ~ o s p i t a l , Physical
Exam Section a t 0700 hours on 16 Apr 92.
I n s t e a d of t h e appointed counsel, you may have
6. M i l i t a r y l e g a l counsel has been obtained t o a s s i s t you. An
appointment has been scheduled f o r you t o c o n s u l t him a t 1600 hours on
Friday, 17 Apr 92.
another, i f t h e lawyer you r e q u e s t i s i n t h e a c t i v e m i l i t a r y s e r v i c e and
i s reasonably a v a i l a b l e a s determined according t o AFR 111-1.
a d d i t i o n t o m i l i t a r y counsel, you have t h e r i g h t t o employ c i v i l i a n
counsel. The A i r Force does n o t pay expenses i n c i d e n t t o t h e employment
of c i v i l i a n counsel. C i v i l i a n counsel, i f employed, must be r e a d i l y
a v a i l a b l e .
I n
7. Confer with your counsel and r e p l y , i n w r i t i n g w i t h i n seven ( 7 )
workdays (24 Apr 92, 0900), s p e c i f y i n g t h e r i g h t s you choose t o e x e r c i s e .
The statement must be signed i n t h e presence of your counsel who a l s o
w i l l s i g n it. I f you waive your r i g h t t o a h e a r i n g b e f o r e an
a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board, you may submit w r i t t e n statements i n your
own behalf.
t h e c a s e f i l e t o be considered w i t h t h i s recommendation.
I f you f a i l t o
respond, your f a i l u r e w i l l c o n s t i t u t e a waiver of t h e r i g h t t o t h e board
hearing.
I w i l l send t h e statements t o t h e discharge a u t h o r i t y w i t h
8. Any p e r s o n a l information you f u r n i s h i n r e b u t t a l is covered by t h e
Privacy A c t Statement a s explained i n AFR 39-10, Attachment 6. A copy of
AFR 39-10 i s a v a i l a b l e f o r your u s e i n t h e Unit Orderly ~oom.
9 - Execute t h e a t t a c h e d acknowledgment and r e t u r n it t o me immediately.
1 Atch
Supporting documents f o r reasons
f o r discharge
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00102
-- I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. He contends that his commander at the time of discharge stated he believed applicant was deserving of an Honorable Discharge but was directed to offer him a General Discharge, that at the Administrative Discharge Board, his commander testified that he should have an Honorable Discharge (applicant later changed his issue to state that his commander's testimony was that he should receive a General Discharge),...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00042
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct--Commission of a Serious Offense Issue 1 : Applicant contends that he was young and immature. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. I have been out of the United States Air Force for roughly thirteen years, but not a day goes by that I do not think about the good memories, and childish mistakes that I made.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00137
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00137 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. LOC , LOC , LOC , LOR, 25 MAY 90 19 MAY 89 20 APR 89 01 MAR 89 - Late for duty. S u p p o r t i n g Documents a AF Form 3070, s e r v e d 6 Nov 9 0 , w / a t c h b LOR, d a t e d 1 3 J u l 90 w / a t c h c LOC, d a t e d 25 May 90 d LOC, d a t e d 19 May 89 e...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00081
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 7 GRADE 1 AB I I . CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate undcr the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0006
Attachment : Examiner's Brief I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2 0 02 - 0.0 0 6 (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. RECOMMENDATION: Respondent’s misconduct and unwillingness t o conform his H i s service behavior t o Air Force s t a n d a r d s support h i s immediate separation. c. Your duty performance was Substandard, This is evidenced by Letter of Reprimand, by the Commander, dated 5 May 92 (atch c).
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00012
The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s and a Vacation for misconduct. Reduction to AB, restriction to the limits of Charleston AFB, SC, for 30 days, and 30 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 01 May 06, Vacation, Charleston AFB, SC - Article 92.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00246
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2006-00246 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reasoil and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Attachment Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ' ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1. :to steal lawful United States Specification: Did, at or near Dover AFB, Delaware, between on or about 19 Mar 96 and on...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00406
(Change Discharge to Honorable) Issues: My discharge was inequitable because it was an isolated incident. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 91/07/17 for 4 yrs. Copies of t h e documents t o be forwarded t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y i n support o f t h i s recommendation a r e attached.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00247
The board recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with a UOTHC characterization. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. The discharge board or the discharge authority will make the findings and recommendations required under 10 U.S.C.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00385
He was administratively disciplined for failing dorm room inspections, failing to maintain proper standards of personal hygiene and cleanliness, failure to go, and operating a vehicle without insurance or current registration. DD Form 214 APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES (Piease read Instnrcrions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) As a r e s u l t , your v e h i c l e was impounded and you r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r o...