/$NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
I GRADE
( AFSNISSAN
I
MEMBER SITTING
1
VOTE OF THE BOARD
HON
I
GEN
1 UOTHC
OTHER
I
DENY
3
.................................
ISSUES A94.05
INDEX NUMBER
A66.00
HEARING DATE
03 Jun 2004
CASE NUMBER
FD-2001-0348
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
X
1
2
3
4
EXHBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, hlD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 ..
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2001-0348
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of Discharge is denied.
ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the
applicant received an Administrative Discharge Board for possession of 40 grams of cocaine and wrongful
use of marijuana. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected
of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be
appropriate. Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the
service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports,
letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct
offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The DRB was pleased to see that the
applicant was doing well and is paying his taxes. However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was
suggested or found in the course of the hearing. Finally, the applicant contends that he should not be
penalized indefinitely for a mistake he made when young. The DRB noticed the applicant was 30 years of
age when the discharge took place. There is no evidence he was immature or did not know right from
wrong. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this
case.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
L
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former SSGT)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a UOTH Disch fr USAF 86/09/12 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-49c (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 55/12/16. Enlmt Age: 21 4/12. Disch Age: 30 8/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-65, E-40, G-75, M-55. PAFSC: 70270 - Administrative Technician.
DAS: 84/02/07.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 77/11/25 - 78/03/06 ( 3 months 9 days) (Inactive).
(2) Enld as AB 78/03/07 for 4 yrs. Ext 80/03/20 for 6
months. Ext 80/06/24 for 12 months, Ext 80/12/23 for 4 months. Ext 81/02/18 for
AMN - 78/09/01. A1C - 79/03/07.
1 month. Svd: 5 yrs 3 months 3 days, all AMS.
SRA - 80/09/01. SGT - 81/09/01. SSGT - 82/10/29. APRs: 9,9,9,9,9.
3. .SERVICE UNDER RBVIEW:
a. Reenld as SSGT 83/06/10 for 4 yrs. Svd: 03 Yrs 03 Mo 03 Das, of which
AMS is 3 yrs 2 months 5 days (excludes 28 days lost time).
b. Grade Status: none.
c. Time Lost: 85/08/14 thru 85/08/15 & 86/04/23 thru 86/05/20 (28 days).
d. Art 15's: none.
e. Additional: BOARD HEARING, 17 JUN 86 - Possession of 40 grams of
cocaine and wrongful use of marijuana.
f. CM: none.
g. Record of SV: 82/06/24 - 83/06/23 Boerfink MTR 9 (Annual)
83/06/24 - 84/01/05 Boerfink MTR 9 (CRO)
84/01/06 - 85/01/05 Patrick AFB 9 (Annual)
85/01/06 - 85/09/15 Patrick AFB 8 (CRO)
85/09/16 - 85/12/25 Patrick AFB 7 (HAF Dir)REF
(Discharged from Patrick AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFCM, AFAM, NCOPMER, AFLSAR W/1 OLC, AFOSLTR W/1 OLC,
AFTR AFGCM W/1 OLC.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (8) Yrs (8) Mos (21) Das
e. Testimony o f captain-
e s t i f i e d as
t o t h e respondent's outstandinq duty perEormance. He f u r t h e r t e s t i f i e d he
d i d n ' t b e l i e v e the charges against the respondent.
Captain
respondent's e x c e l l e n t duty performance. She f u r t h e r t e s t i f i e d the
respondent has been an asset t o t h e A i r Force.
TSgt -estif
i e d as t o t h e
.g. Testimony o f ~ ~ c j t -
t o t h e respondent's o u t X a n & i n g duty performance.
~ s ~ t Q L l l D l b Y I
t e s t i f i e d as
f.
h.
respondent's outstanding d u t y performance and h i s being an asset t o t h e A i r
Force.
~ ~ ~ t m t e s t
i
f
i e d
as t o t h e
. L
'i. Testimony o f Mrs.
respondent s, excel l e n t d
u
r
n
, Mrs - t e s t i f i e d
.
as t o t h e
\i*
t e s t i f i e d t h a t
t h e bag,containing t h e 40 grams o f cocaine had been l e f t i n t h e r e n t a l car
he was d r i v i n g by a f r i e n d he had picked up. He f u r t h e r t e s t i f i e d he had
m
S
S
g
f " not used marijuana.
4. The evidence i n t h e record i s s u f f i c i e n t t o support t h e board's f i n d i n g s
by a preponderance o f t h e evidence. This standard i s not as rigorous as t h e
"beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used i n courts-martial. With t h a t i n
t h e f i n d i n g s o f t h e board are w e l l w i t h i n t h e preponderance standards
mind,
as required.
I t i s recommended t h a t SSgt -be
5 .
than honorable c o n d i t i o n s s e r v i c e c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n without an o f f e r o f
discharged w i t h a under o t h e r
and rehabi 1 itati'on opportunities.
was sentenced i n c i v i l i a n court t o 3 1/2 years i n p r i s o n f o r
I t i s f u r t h e r noted t h a t SSgt
t r a f f i c k i n g i n cocaine.
colonel, USAF
S t a f f Judge Advocate
1
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
FD2001-0353
H E A D O U A R T E R S A I H F O R C F T t ( : U N I C A L A I ' P L I C A r I O N b C t F 1 7 L H
P A T R l C K A I R F O R C E BASE. F L O R I D A 32925-6001
R E P L Y TO
A T T N O F : CCQ
S U B J E C T Letter of Notification - Board Hearing
2 DEC 2985
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for
misconduct according to AFR 39-10, under the provisions of paragraph 5-49c.
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority to support
this recommendation are attached.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On or about 14 Aug 85, you illegally possessed approximately 40
grams of cocaine at or near Bartow, Florida. You were arrested by civilian law
enforcement agents for this infraction. In addition, you were subsequently
charged with trafficking in cocaine in violation of Florida law.
b. On or about 16 Aug 85, you wrongfully used marijuana. This illegal
activity was detected when a urine specimen you provided on 16 Auq 8 5
tested positive for the presence of tetrahydrocannbinal (THC) the active ingre-
dient of marijuana.
,
3. Thie action could result in your separation with an Under Other Tban
Honorable Conditions discharge. I am recommending that you receive an Under
Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge, The commander exercising SPCM juris-
diction or a higher authotity will make the final deci~ion in this ~natter. If
you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenl fatinant in tho hi r F o r w .
4. You have the right to:
a. Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the
board hearing.
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making a
decision to waive any of your rights.
5 . You have been scheduled for a medical exqination. You muat report to the
Patrick APB Hospital, Physical Exam Section, at 0700 on 6 Jan 86. You
must fast the evening before, i.e., you may drink water in the evening but can
consume no food after 1800. If you wear contact lenses, you must not wear them
for 72 hours and should keep them in a water solution for the three day
duration.
, .
6. M i l i t a r y l e g a l counsel, apt- P a t r i c k AFB FL, 494-4423 h a s been
obtained t o a s s i s t you. An appointment has been scheduled f o r you t o c o n s u l t
him a t 0900 on 2 J a n 86 i n b u i l d i n g 4 2 5 , Room 3-109.
I n s t e a d of t h e appointed
counsel, you may have another, i f t h e lawyer you r e q u e s t is i n t h e a c t i v e m i l i -
t a r y s e r v i c e and i s reasonably a v a i l a b l e a s determined according t o AFM 111-1,
I n a d d i t i o n t o m i l i t a r y counsel, you have t h e r i g h t t o employ c i v i l i a n counsel.
The ~ i r Force does n o t pay expenses i n c i d e n t t o t h e employment of c i v i l i a n coun-
s e l . C i v i l i a n counsel, i f employed, must be r e a d i l y a v a i l a b l e .
7. Confer with your counsel and r e p l y , i n w r i t i n g , w i t h i n seven workdays, spe-
c i f y i n g t h e r i g h t s you choose t o e x e r c i s e . The s t a t e m e n t must be signed i n t h e
presence of your couneel who a l s o w i l l mign it. I f you waive your r l g h t Ca a
hearing b e f o r e an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d i s c h a r g e board, you may submit w r i t t e n s t a t e -
ments in your own b e h a l f .
w i t h t h e c a s e f i l e t o be considered with t h i s recommendation.
respond, your f a i l u r e w i l l c o n s t i t u t e a waiver of t h e r i g h t t o t h e board
h e a r i n g .
8: Any personal information you f u r n i s h i n r e b u t t a l is covered by t h e Privacy
A c t Statement ae explained i n APR 39-10, attachment 6 . A copy of AFR 39-10 is
a v a i l a b l e f o r your use i n t h e Unit Orderly Room.
I w i l l send t h e s t a t e m e n t s t o t h e d i s c h a r g e a u t h o r i t y
If you f a i l t o
9. Execute t h e a t t a c h e d acknowledgement and r e t u r n it t o me immediately.
-commander, Headquarters Squadron
/
,'
3 Atch
1. Synopsis of AFOSI D i e t 7
Report of I n v e s t i g a t i o n , NR:
8507D17-3084
0 Nov 85
Acknowledgement of Receipt o f
L e t t e r of N o t i f i c a t i o n
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00141
ISSUES: Applicant was recommended for discharge based on both drug abuse and misconduct; the records indicated the applicant received five Letters of Counseling (LOCs) for being late to work, and a commander- directed urinalysis was returned positive for the presence of cocaine. Member exercised his right to an administrative discharge board and the board found that member was late to work five times and did wrongfully use cocaine. SrA-(APR Indicates): 14 Jun 85-21 Dec 85.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00102
-- I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. He contends that his commander at the time of discharge stated he believed applicant was deserving of an Honorable Discharge but was directed to offer him a General Discharge, that at the Administrative Discharge Board, his commander testified that he should have an Honorable Discharge (applicant later changed his issue to state that his commander's testimony was that he should receive a General Discharge),...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0050
the offense, the board's recommendation should be followed. t you recommend t o Commander, Headquarters A i r Force D i s t r i c t of IJas.hin(jton, t h a t T S q t be discha.r(jed from t h e A i r Force w i t h a n Under Conditions Discharge, wi t h o u t an award of Atch Roard Proceedings DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 7TH COMMUNICATIONS GROUP WASHINGTON DC 20330-6345 REPLY TO ATTNOF: MS suwuEcT: Notification Letter - Board Hearing 29 Apr 92 _-_ . In addition to military counsel, you...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00152
- ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 07 Dec 2005 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TXE BOARD'S DECISKlNAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2005-00152 I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used i i AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0038
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD20024038 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner’s Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) FD2002-0038 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00034
4 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00034 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Records review revealed that the applicant received an Article 15 for wronghlly using marijuana on or about April 30, 1985 and a second Article 15 for failure to obey a lawhl order while in correctional custody. Today I have prescribe medication Also, there is a letter from my therapist Dr. ------ Please - ATCH 1.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00362
On 3 Nuv 9 2 , you were i n v i o l a t i o n of AFR 35-10. r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r of C o u n s e l i n g on 6 Nov 92 (Tab 1 - 1 0 ) . You must consult legal counsel before making a daei~ion to waive any of your rights. 23 Aug 9 1 , LOR/UIF; 2 J u l 92, MFR: 22 Sep 9 2 , LOC; 6 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 13 Gct 9 2 , LOR; 16 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 28 Oct 92, LOR/UIF/Control Roster; 2 Nov 9 2 , LOR; 4 Nov 92, MFR; 6 Nov 9 2 , LOC; 12 Nov 92, LOR 2 .
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0232
Further, t h e respondent was advised o f the r i g h t s t o a hearing before an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board, t o consult and be represen- t e d by counsel, t o submit statements i n a d d i t i o n t o o r i n 1 i e u o f board hearing, o r t o waive any o f these r j g h t s . The record o f t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board and t h e case f i l e contain no e r r o r s o r i r r e g u l a r i t i e s p r e j u d i c i a l t o t h e respondent's r i g h t...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00046
The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recfd a BCD Disch fr USAF McConnell AFB, KS on 27 Feb 91 UP SPCM Order # 2 , 11 Feb 91. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SSgt 13 Jan 85 for 6 years Svd: 06 Yrs 01 Mo 15 Das, all AMS .
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2002-0423
PLACE R h e i n - M a i n A i r B a s e , G E c. DATE 2 7 A u g u s t 1 9 8 7 I Referred for trial to the s p e c i a l t h i s h e a d a u a r t e r s d a t e d 24 August court-martial convened by S p e c i a l Order AA-17 19 . The 435 discharge. SSg d USAF Rhei n-Mai n C l i n i c/CC both recommend a UOTHC has received two APRs d u r i n g her c u r r e n t en1 i s t m e n t UNIT ED STATES AIR FORCE SEPTEMBER 18,1947 Right People.