,
-
ISSUES
[INSTRUCTIONS: retype any of lhc following s&ie
nunrber consecutively, add detailed explanation and attach lo application. Add any'" '?.-)
otl~cr issues that arc
issues rhaf=$PIY tb $ur,~ate;:i~';~ : I
. - , t ,,'-
\.;*':
,;
# .
'
*
1
2
,
.
F p ~ O 0 2 - a v o /
Name 6t Signature
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Address:
Y
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i
Dear DRB [or] BCMR: The following issues are. the reasons 1 believe my discharge-..
should be upgraded to Honorable. If you disagree, please explain in detail why you
disagree.The presumption of regularity that might normally permit you to assume that .. the> .
service acted correctly in characterizing my service as less than honorable does not ip&
to my case because of the evidence I am submitting.
I*
C3 Clemency is warranted because it is an injustice forme to continue to suffer the adversed- -
consequences of a bad discharge.
[or pretty good].
yi .
W u n d e r current standards, I would not receive the type of discharge I did:. : ' < : + * . ; >:.*
dbIy averge conduct and efficiency ratingsbeha~ior and , proficiency
.*
d1 received awards and decorations.
Q'f
I3 I had combat service.
C] was wounded in action.
received letters of recommendation.
. ,
. ,
.
, ,
9
*
-
,
,
I
I
*
,
f
"
mark; ~ere'~oad?"': " b .{
f
1
> * . '
* .
-
.
. ,
, > , 2 : ...
,, .
.
> :
?
. . .
..
) '
"
El My record of court-martial convictions indicates only isolated or minor offenses.
0 My record of convictions by civil authorities while I was in service indicates only
minor or isolated offenses.
My record of AWOLNA indicates only minor or isolated offenses.
U My ability to serve was impaired by my youth and immaturity.
My low aptitude scores and level of education impaired my ability to serve.
My ability to serve was impaired by my deprived background.
My ability to serve was impaired because of marital and family and child care
problems.
Personal problems impaired my ability to serve.
Financial problems impaired nly ability to serve.
. .
My record of promotions showed I was generally a p o d service member.
,
0 There were other acts of merit.
O I was so close to finishing my tour that it was unfair to give me a bad dischaige..:?
0 had a prior Honorable Discharge.
' I
'
.&
.
J
, $:
.
I - d
.
%!
d
3
I ave been a
My record of
/ r
j
isolated or minor offenses. .
,, ., 3 .,
.
.
' .
,
r _ .
s > : - c , ' 7
g.,
it
*
-
.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00195
[A99.08] - [other reasons] 'lease make an e x t r a copy o f your Attachment and send it t o t h e Veterans Education P r o j e c t (Dept. As a result, you were counseled by Capt eputy Chief of the Services Squadron, who had to make special arrangements to pay off the delinquent American Express account (Atch 6). The commander exercising Special Court-Martial jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if discharge action...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00081
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 7 GRADE 1 AB I I . CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate undcr the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00043
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honor&e:- CASE NUMBER FDO1-00043 I . Two SSgt's and 1 Sgt., whose statements were submitted but not Issue 7: M y command abused it's authority when it decided to discharge me I was told by my commanding lieutenant an decided' to give me a bad discharge. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct - - Minor Disciplinary Infractions.
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00951
My only why out of the military was to hit enlisted officer (e6). MHU will provide PRN support for member.900905: Mental Health Unit: O: Talked with Cmdr S_, who confirmed chapter 13 has been written, but since there is no hope of member remediating on Mast charges, Cmdr S_ will take action to expedite Applicant's discharge within 30 days.Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Mental conditions of severe borderline intellectual functioning and paranoid personality disorder as identified...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0050
the offense, the board's recommendation should be followed. t you recommend t o Commander, Headquarters A i r Force D i s t r i c t of IJas.hin(jton, t h a t T S q t be discha.r(jed from t h e A i r Force w i t h a n Under Conditions Discharge, wi t h o u t an award of Atch Roard Proceedings DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 7TH COMMUNICATIONS GROUP WASHINGTON DC 20330-6345 REPLY TO ATTNOF: MS suwuEcT: Notification Letter - Board Hearing 29 Apr 92 _-_ . In addition to military counsel, you...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00047
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD03-0047 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 20 Jun 01, Pope AFB, NC - Article 91. DD Form 214. going above There were not enough incidents to warrant my General Discharge, and so warrant an upgrade to honorable.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00080
I was told it was because of the reason for separation on my military discharge. T h i s f a c t i s e v i d e n t i n t h e Records o f Counseling g i v e n t o t h e respondent and t h e subsequent p s y c h i a t r i c e v a l u a t i o n , d a t e d 30 A p r i l 1987.The r e t e n t i o n of t h i s respondent would b e i n c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e maintenance of good o r d e r and d i s c i p l i n e . The respondent should b e discharged and h i s d i s c h a r g e should be...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00527
Not k~mwing this discharge ~. (Atch 6 ) g. On 12 J u l y 1989, you went from your appointed p l a c e of duty without a u t h o r i t y , a s evidenced by a Record o f I n d i v i d u a l Counseling, dated 12 J u l y 1989. If you a r e discharged, you w i l l be i n e l i g i b l e f o r 3.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00159
The DRR noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signcd a statement (DD Forin 2366) that hc understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive Silture educational entitlements. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH SRA) I. For your actions, you were punished under Article 15, UCMJ on 9 Aug 02 consisting of a suspended reduction to the grade of airman, forfeiture of $250.00...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00071
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AYB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00071 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge was inequitable because it was based on a single isolated incident. I am recommending your discharge from t h e United States A i r...