Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0490
Original file (FD2001-0490.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

ae

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
ne AIC _
TYPE

 

X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW

 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

VOTE OF THE BOARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN VOTHC OTHER T DENY
xX
X
XxX
x
Le
X
INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
A94.01 A67.10 1. | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

 

2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

 

 

3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

 

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER “4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

20 NOV 02 FD2001-0490 COUNSELS RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF ~
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

 

nln
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

 

REMARKS

Case heard at Dobbins ARB, Georgia.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

  
 
 

 

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER

 

INDORSEMENT

DATE: 20: NOV 02

    

 

 

TO: FROM: ——
SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3®° FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pr 7991-9490

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, and to change the Reason and
Authority for discharge.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at
Dobbins ARB, GA on November 20, 2002.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge to Honorable is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record or that provided by the applicant substantiates an
impropriety that would justify upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct. Member received an
Article 15 for failure to go. He also received four Letters of Counseling and one Letter of Reprimand. In
addition, he was noted for being late for work and having financial problems. Applicant does not contest
his discharge; he merely would like to re-enlist and states that he now has personal responsibility and a
work ethic since his discharge. The DRB concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from the
conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant
was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
Te

FD2001-0490

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

MISSING DOCUMENTS

m,n (Former AlC) (HGH A1C)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 97/04/14 UP AFI 36-3208
(Misconduct). Appeals for Honorable Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 77/07/18. Enlmt Age: 17 10/12. Disch Age: 19 8/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-40, E-46, G-55, M-62. PAFPSC: 2W031 ~ Munitions Systems
Apprentice. DAS: 95/10/26.
b. Prior Sv: none.
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as A1C 95/06/15 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 09 Mo 30 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: none.

c. Time Lost: none.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 97/04/03, Spangdalem AB, Germany. (Facts and
Circumstances missing) .

e. Additional: Unknown.

£. CM: none.

g. Record of SV: 95/06/15 - 97/01/15 Spangdalem AB 2 (HAF Dir)
(Discharged from Eglin AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFOSLTR, AFCM.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (09) Mos (30) Das
TAMS: (01) Yrs (09) Mos (30) Dag

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 01/10/31.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

Issue 1: It is my intention upon approval of this panel to re-enlist in the
Air Force or Air Force Reserves. I intend to demonstrate to this panel the
qualities of personal responsibility and work ethic that I have learned since my
separation that will allow me to excell with the Air Force.
FD2001-0490

ATCH
none.

02/06/03/ia

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0521

    Original file (FD2001-0521.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0521 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for Unsatisfactory Performance after 3 years, 2 months and 23 days of service. The DRB noted that the applicant understood he must receive an honorable discharge in order to receive educational entitlements when he signed a statement on DD Form 2366 application...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0367

    Original file (FD2001-0367.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE REMARKS Case heard at Dobbins ARB GA *The AFRDB determined the applicant's reenlistment code (RE) would justifies upgrading her discharge from general to honorable. The applicant received an Article 15 for failing to make prompt payments on her government credit card. Attachment: Examiner's...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0310

    Original file (FD2001-0310.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES NO Xx MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUES A94.11 INDEX NUMBER A 67.70 3 7 : APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | 112102 FD2001-0310 | | COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0494

    Original file (FD2001-0494.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0494 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of his Bad Conduct Discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2001-0494 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ee (Former AB) 1. The accused pleaded not guilty to the Specification of Charge II and Charge II which was withdrawn after arraignment.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0442

    Original file (FD2001-0442.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE °D2001-0442 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of his general discharge to honorable. (2) Did on or about 11 Mar 92, at Tampa, FL, unlawfully strike NT a child under the age of 16 years, in the face with his hand, as evidenced by a Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceeding dated 28 May 92. Recommend the Respondent be discharged with a General Discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0464

    Original file (FD2001-0464.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0464 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached, ‘The commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, and if you are discharged, how your service will be characterized. The Air...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0353

    Original file (FD2001-0353.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ppo001-0353 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Plea: G. Finding: G. Specification: Did, at or near Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, between on or about 11 May 1995 and on or about 16 May 1995, wrongfully use marijuana, Plea: G. Finding: G. SENTENCE Sentence adjudged on 19 July 1995: Bad conduct discharge, 30 days confinement, and reduction to the pay grade of E-1. Sentencing evidence...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00068

    Original file (FD01-00068.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Letter of Reprimand, four Letters of Counseling, and was court-martialed for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Svd: 3 Yrs 4 Mo 1 Das, of which AMs is 3 Yrs 2 Mos 1 Day (excludes 2 months lost time) b. Grade Status: AB - 98/08/07 (SPCMO# 13, 98/08/09) A1C -...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0040

    Original file (FD2002-0040.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN | AB «oT X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION . I believe my discharge was inequitable because this was a one time incident in my 20 months of service in the Air Force. I understand my responsibility as it was to myself and the Air Force and I made a poor decision to smoke marijuana to fit in with others.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0193

    Original file (FD2002-0193.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ee AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN reece TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ~~ YES NO xX rela, nl VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ee ISSUES INDEX NUMBER oe SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A93.01 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ~ HEARING...